OBJECTIVE: While intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) allows more precise radiation planning, the technology is substantially more costly than conformal radiation and, to date, the benefits of IMRT for uterine cancer are not well defined. We examined the use of IMRT and its effect on late toxicity for uterine cancer. METHODS: Women with uterine cancer treated from 2001 to 2007 and registered in the SEER-Medicare database were examined. We investigated the extent and predictors of IMRT administration. The incidence of acute and late-radiation toxicities was compared for IMRT and conformal radiation. RESULTS: We identified a total of 3555 patients including 328 (9.2%) who received IMRT. Use of IMRT increased rapidly and reached 23.2% by 2007. In a multivariable model, residence in the western U.S. and receipt of chemotherapy were associated with receipt of IMRT. Women who received IMRT had a higher rate of bowel obstruction (rate ratio=1.41; 95% CI, 1.03-1.93), but other late gastrointestinal and genitourinary toxicities as well as hip fracture rates were similar between the cohorts. After accounting for other characteristics, the cost of IMRT was $14,706 (95% CI, $12,073 to $17,339) greater than conformal radiation. CONCLUSION: The use of IMRT for uterine cancer is increasing rapidly. IMRT was not associated with a reduction in radiation toxicity, but was more costly.
OBJECTIVE: While intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) allows more precise radiation planning, the technology is substantially more costly than conformal radiation and, to date, the benefits of IMRT for uterine cancer are not well defined. We examined the use of IMRT and its effect on late toxicity for uterine cancer. METHODS:Women with uterine cancer treated from 2001 to 2007 and registered in the SEER-Medicare database were examined. We investigated the extent and predictors of IMRT administration. The incidence of acute and late-radiation toxicities was compared for IMRT and conformal radiation. RESULTS: We identified a total of 3555 patients including 328 (9.2%) who received IMRT. Use of IMRT increased rapidly and reached 23.2% by 2007. In a multivariable model, residence in the western U.S. and receipt of chemotherapy were associated with receipt of IMRT. Women who received IMRT had a higher rate of bowel obstruction (rate ratio=1.41; 95% CI, 1.03-1.93), but other late gastrointestinal and genitourinary toxicities as well as hip fracture rates were similar between the cohorts. After accounting for other characteristics, the cost of IMRT was $14,706 (95% CI, $12,073 to $17,339) greater than conformal radiation. CONCLUSION: The use of IMRT for uterine cancer is increasing rapidly. IMRT was not associated with a reduction in radiation toxicity, but was more costly.
Authors: Howard D Homesley; Virginia Filiaci; Susan K Gibbons; Harry J Long; David Cella; Nick M Spirtos; Robert T Morris; Koen DeGeest; Roger Lee; Anthony Montag Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2008-12-23 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: Joan L Warren; K Robin Yabroff; Angela Meekins; Marie Topor; Elizabeth B Lamont; Martin L Brown Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2008-06-10 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Michael K M Kam; Sing-Fai Leung; Benny Zee; Ricky M C Chau; Joyce J S Suen; Frankie Mo; Maria Lai; Rosalie Ho; Kin-yin Cheung; Brian K H Yu; Samuel K W Chiu; Peter H K Choi; Peter M L Teo; Wing-hong Kwan; Anthony T C Chan Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2007-11-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Angeles Alvarez Secord; Laura J Havrilesky; Victoria Bae-Jump; Jeanette Chin; Brian Calingaert; Amy Bland; Teresa L Rutledge; Andrew Berchuck; Daniel L Clarke-Pearson; Paola A Gehrig Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2007-08-06 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: Xianglin L Du; Shenying Fang; Sally W Vernon; Hashem El-Serag; Y Tina Shih; Jessica Davila; Monica L Rasmus Journal: Cancer Date: 2007-08-01 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: P Blake; Ann Marie Swart; J Orton; H Kitchener; T Whelan; H Lukka; E Eisenhauer; M Bacon; D Tu; M K B Parmar; C Amos; C Murray; W Qian Journal: Lancet Date: 2008-12-16 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Jason D Wright; Benjamin Margolis; June Y Hou; William M Burke; Ana I Tergas; Yongmei Huang; Jim C Hu; Cande V Ananth; Alfred I Neugut; Dawn L Hershman Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2016-02-11 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Jelena Lukovic; Nikhilesh Patil; David D'souza; Barbara Millman; Brian P Yaremko; Eric Leung; Frances Whiston; George Hajdok; Eugene Wong Journal: Cureus Date: 2016-01-25