Cervical cancer treated with reduced-volume intensity-modulated radiation therapy base on Sedlis criteria (NCCN VS RTOG).

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of different target volumes in pelvic radiotherapy in postoperative treatment of cervical cancer based on the Sedlis criteria.
METHODS: Patients who admitted to our department for post-operative radiotherapy of cervical cancer from December 2001 to December 2011 and met the Sedlis criteria were retrospectively analysed. The incidences of acute and late radiation injuries, and overall, disease-free and tumour-specific survival with reduced-volume pelvic and whole-pelvis radiotherapy were evaluated and compared.
RESULTS: A total of 371 patients were included in the study, including 239 receiving whole-pelvis radiotherapy and 132 receiving reduced-volume pelvic radiotherapy. The volume of contours for mean PTV volumes, bilateral femoral heads and small intestine volumes in reduced-volume pelvic radiotherapy were lower than whole-pelvis radiotherapy; the results were similar to the V10, V20, V30, V40 and V45 for pelvic bone marrow and small intestine dose volume (both p < 0.05). The acute radiation injury observed in the two groups was mainly haematologic toxicity and upper and lower gastrointestinal symptoms. The incidences of acute radiation injury, and late radiation injury of gastrointestinal and urinary tracts were both significantly lower with reduced-volume pelvic radiotherapy than with whole-pelvis radiotherapy (both p < 0.05). Moreover, there was no significant difference in the incidence of lower extremity oedema, or 2-year or 5-year overall, disease-free or tumour-specific survival between groups (all p > 0.05).
CONCLUSION: Reduced-volume pelvic radiotherapy could relieve acute and late radiation injuries, especially myelosuppression, and did not affect long-term survival. Advanced in knowledge: Our study shows that reduced-volume base on National Comprehensive Cancer Network 2016 is more fit for cervical cancer than others.