Literature DB >> 18544740

Evaluation of trends in the cost of initial cancer treatment.

Joan L Warren1, K Robin Yabroff, Angela Meekins, Marie Topor, Elizabeth B Lamont, Martin L Brown.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite reports of increases in the cost of cancer treatment, little is known about how costs of cancer treatment have changed over time and what services have contributed to the increases.
METHODS: We used data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare linked database for 306,709 persons aged 65 and older and diagnosed with breast, lung, colorectal, or prostate cancer between 1991 and 2002 to assess the number of patients assigned to initial cancer care, from 2 months before diagnosis to 12 months after diagnosis, and mean annual Medicare payments for this care according to cancer type and type of treatment. Mutually exclusive treatment categories were cancer-related surgery, chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and other hospitalizations during the period of initial cancer care. Linear regression models were used to assess temporal trends in the percentage of patients receiving treatment and costs for those treated. We extrapolated our results based on the SEER data to the US Medicare population to estimate national Medicare payments by cancer site and treatment category. All statistical tests were two-sided.
RESULTS: For patients diagnosed in 2002, Medicare paid an average of $39,891 for initial care for each lung cancer patient, $41 134 for each colorectal cancer patient, and $20,964 for each breast cancer patient, corresponding to inflation-adjusted increases from 1991 of $7139, $5345, and $4189, respectively. During the same interval, the mean Medicare payment for initial care for prostate cancer declined by $196 to $18261 in 2002. Costs for any hospitalization accounted for the largest portion of payments for all cancers. Chemotherapy use increased markedly for all cancers between 1991 and 2002, as did radiation therapy use (except for colorectal cancers). Total 2002 Medicare payments for initial care for these four cancers exceeded $6.7 billion, with colorectal and lung cancers being the most costly overall.
CONCLUSIONS: The statistically significant increase in costs of initial cancer treatment reflects more patients receiving surgery and adjuvant therapy and rising prices for these treatments. These trends are likely to continue in the near future, although more efficient targeting of costly therapies could mitigate the overall economic impact of this trend.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18544740      PMCID: PMC3298963          DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djn175

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst        ISSN: 0027-8874            Impact factor:   13.506


  29 in total

1.  Out-of-pocket health care costs among older Americans.

Authors:  S Crystal; R W Johnson; J Harman; U Sambamoorthi; R Kumar
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.077

2.  Accuracy and completeness of Medicare claims data for surgical treatment of breast cancer.

Authors:  X Du; J L Freeman; J L Warren; A B Nattinger; D Zhang; J S Goodwin
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.983

3.  Adjuvant chemotherapy and survival in older women with hormone receptor-negative breast cancer: assessing outcome in a population-based, observational cohort.

Authors:  Elena B Elkin; Arti Hurria; Nandita Mitra; Deborah Schrag; Katherine S Panageas
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-06-20       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Age and adjuvant chemotherapy use after surgery for stage III colon cancer.

Authors:  D Schrag; L D Cramer; P B Bach; C B Begg
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2001-06-06       Impact factor: 13.506

5.  Identifying a cohort of patients with early-stage breast cancer: a comparison of hospital discharge and primary data.

Authors:  J N Jonkman; S L Normand; R Wolf; C Borbas; E Guadagnoli
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 2.983

Review 6.  Treatment and outcomes for elderly patients with small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  R J Stephens; D H Johnson
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 3.923

7.  Effectiveness of chemotherapy for advanced lung cancer in the elderly: instrumental variable and propensity analysis.

Authors:  C C Earle; J S Tsai; R D Gelber; M C Weinstein; P J Neumann; J C Weeks
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2001-02-15       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Economic analysis of vinorelbine plus cisplatin versus paclitaxel plus carboplatin for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Scott D Ramsey; Carol M Moinpour; Laura C Lovato; John J Crowley; Patra Grevstad; Cary A Presant; Saul E Rivkin; Karen Kelly; David R Gandara
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2002-02-20       Impact factor: 13.506

9.  Costs of treatment for elderly women with early-stage breast cancer in fee-for-service settings.

Authors:  Joan L Warren; Martin L Brown; Michael P Fay; Nicola Schussler; Arnold L Potosky; Gerald F Riley
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2002-01-01       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Comparing the costs of radiation therapy and radical prostatectomy for the initial treatment of early-stage prostate cancer.

Authors:  Jeffrey H Burkhardt; Mark S Litwin; Christopher M Rose; Roy J Correa; Jonathan H Sunshine; Christopher Hogan; James A Hayman
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2002-06-15       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  151 in total

1.  Cost of care for colorectal cancer in Ireland: a health care payer perspective.

Authors:  L Tilson; L Sharp; C Usher; C Walsh; Whyte S; A O'Ceilleachair; C Stuart; B Mehigan; M John Kennedy; P Tappenden; J Chilcott; A Staines; H Comber; M Barry
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2011-06-03

2.  National estimates of out-of-pocket health care expenditure burdens among nonelderly adults with cancer: 2001 to 2008.

Authors:  Didem S M Bernard; Stacy L Farr; Zhengyi Fang
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-05-31       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Longitudinal patterns in survival, comorbidity, healthcare utilization and quality of care among older women following breast cancer diagnosis.

Authors:  Amresh D Hanchate; Kerri M Clough-Gorr; Arlene S Ash; Soe Soe Thwin; Rebecca A Silliman
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Prior cancer does not adversely affect survival in locally advanced lung cancer: A national SEER-medicare analysis.

Authors:  Andrew L Laccetti; Sandi L Pruitt; Lei Xuan; Ethan A Halm; David E Gerber
Journal:  Lung Cancer       Date:  2016-05-31       Impact factor: 5.705

5.  Resource Use in the Last Year of Life Among Patients Who Died With Versus of Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Michaela A Dinan; Yanhong Li; Yinghong Zhang; Suzanne B Stewart; Lesley H Curtis; Daniel J George; Shelby D Reed
Journal:  Clin Genitourin Cancer       Date:  2015-08-06       Impact factor: 2.872

6.  Uptake and costs of hypofractionated vs conventional whole breast irradiation after breast conserving surgery in the United States, 2008-2013.

Authors:  Justin E Bekelman; Gosia Sylwestrzak; John Barron; Jinan Liu; Andrew J Epstein; Gary Freedman; Jennifer Malin; Ezekiel J Emanuel
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2014-12-17       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Breast cancer treatment costs in younger, privately insured women.

Authors:  Benjamin T Allaire; Donatus U Ekwueme; Diana Poehler; Cheryll C Thomas; Gery P Guy; Sujha Subramanian; Justin G Trogdon
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2017-04-21       Impact factor: 4.872

8.  A randomized trial of tailoring and motivational interviewing to promote fruit and vegetable consumption for cancer prevention and control.

Authors:  Marci Kramish Campbell; Carol Carr; Brenda Devellis; Boyd Switzer; Andrea Biddle; M Ahinee Amamoo; Joan Walsh; Bingqing Zhou; Robert Sandler
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2009-10

9.  Effect of rising chemotherapy costs on the cost savings of colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar; Marjolein van Ballegooijen; Ann G Zauber; J Dik F Habbema; Ernst J Kuipers
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2009-09-24       Impact factor: 13.506

10.  Patterns of use and risks associated with erythropoiesis-stimulating agents among Medicare patients with cancer.

Authors:  Dawn L Hershman; Donna L Buono; Jennifer Malin; Russell McBride; Wei Yann Tsai; Alfred I Neugut
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 13.506

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.