Literature DB >> 23489163

The impact of temperature and urinary constituents on urine viscosity and its relevance to bladder hyperthermia treatment.

Brant A Inman1, Wiguins Etienne, Rainier Rubin, Richmond A Owusu, Tiago R Oliveira, Dario B Rodriques, Paolo F Maccarini, Paul R Stauffer, Alireza Mashal, Mark W Dewhirst.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine the kinematic viscosity of human urine and factors associated with its variability. This value is necessary for accurate modelling of fluid mechanics and heat transfer during hyperthermia treatments of bladder cancer.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Urine samples from 64 patients undergoing routine clinical testing were subject to dipstick urinalysis and measurement of viscosity with a Cannon-Fenske viscometer. Viscosity measurements were taken at relevant temperatures for hyperthermia studies: 20 °C (room temperature), 37 °C (body temperature), and 42 °C (clinical hyperthermia temperature). Factors that might affect viscosity were assessed, including glucosuria, haematuria, urinary tract infection status, ketonuria and proteinuria status. The correlation of urine specific gravity and viscosity was measured with Spearman's rho.
RESULTS: Urine kinematic viscosity at 20 °C was 1.0700 cSt (standard deviation (SD) = 0.1076), at 37 °C 0.8293 cSt (SD = 0.0851), and at 42 °C 0.6928 cSt (SD = 0.0247). Proteinuria appeared to increase urine viscosity, whereas age, gender, urinary tract infection, glucosuria, ketonuria, and haematuria did not affect it. Urine specific gravity was only modestly correlated with urine viscosity at 20 °C (rho = 0.259), 37 °C (rho = 0.266), and 42 °C (rho = 0.255).
CONCLUSIONS: The kinematic viscosity of human urine is temperature dependent and higher than water. Urine specific gravity was not a good predictor of viscosity. Of factors that might affect urine viscosity, only proteinuria appeared to be clinically relevant. Estimates of urine viscosity provided in this manuscript may be useful for temperature modelling of bladder hyperthermia treatments with regard to correct prediction of the thermal conduction effects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23489163     DOI: 10.3109/02656736.2013.775355

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Hyperthermia        ISSN: 0265-6736            Impact factor:   3.914


  15 in total

Review 1.  Microfluidic viscometers for shear rheology of complex fluids and biofluids.

Authors:  Siddhartha Gupta; William S Wang; Siva A Vanapalli
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2016-07-05       Impact factor: 2.800

2.  A theoretical study of inertial cavitation from acoustic radiation force impulse imaging and implications for the mechanical index.

Authors:  Charles C Church; Cecille Labuda; Kathryn Nightingale
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 2.998

3.  Computational fluid dynamics modeling approaches to assess lower urinary tract hydraulic dynamics in posterior urethral valve before and after endoscopic valve ablation: a pilot study.

Authors:  Hong-Song Chen; Xing Liu; Zhi-Cheng Zhang; Zi-Han Ye; Tao Lin; Da-Wei He; Guang-Hui Wei
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2021-11-22       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  Urinary extracellular vesicles: A position paper by the Urine Task Force of the International Society for Extracellular Vesicles.

Authors:  Uta Erdbrügger; Charles J Blijdorp; Irene V Bijnsdorp; Francesc E Borràs; Dylan Burger; Benedetta Bussolati; James Brian Byrd; Aled Clayton; James W Dear; Juan M Falcón-Pérez; Cristina Grange; Andrew F Hill; Harry Holthöfer; Ewout J Hoorn; Guido Jenster; Connie R Jimenez; Kerstin Junker; John Klein; Mark A Knepper; Erik H Koritzinsky; James M Luther; Metka Lenassi; Janne Leivo; Inge Mertens; Luca Musante; Eline Oeyen; Maija Puhka; Martin E van Royen; Catherine Sánchez; Carolina Soekmadji; Visith Thongboonkerd; Volkert van Steijn; Gerald Verhaegh; Jason P Webber; Kenneth Witwer; Peter S T Yuen; Lei Zheng; Alicia Llorente; Elena S Martens-Uzunova
Journal:  J Extracell Vesicles       Date:  2021-05-21

Review 5.  Viscoelasticity of biofilms and their recalcitrance to mechanical and chemical challenges.

Authors:  Brandon W Peterson; Yan He; Yijin Ren; Aidan Zerdoum; Matthew R Libera; Prashant K Sharma; Arie-Jan van Winkelhoff; Danielle Neut; Paul Stoodley; Henny C van der Mei; Henk J Busscher
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Rev       Date:  2015-02-02       Impact factor: 16.408

6.  A simplified method to recover urinary vesicles for clinical applications, and sample banking.

Authors:  Luca Musante; Dorota Tataruch; Dongfeng Gu; Alberto Benito-Martin; Giulio Calzaferri; Sinead Aherne; Harry Holthofer
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2014-12-23       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  High-Throughput Cell Concentration Using A Piezoelectric Pump in Closed-Loop Viscoelastic Microfluidics.

Authors:  Jeeyong Kim; Hyunjung Lim; Hyunseul Jee; Seunghee Choo; Minji Yang; Sungha Park; Kyounghwa Lee; Hyoungsook Park; Chaeseung Lim; Jeonghun Nam
Journal:  Micromachines (Basel)       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 2.891

8.  Comparative study of renal drainage with different ureteral stents subject to extrinsic ureteral obstruction using an in vitro ureter-stent model.

Authors:  Yaniv Shilo; Jonathan Modai; Dan Leibovici; Ishai Dror; Brian Berkowitz
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2021-07-14       Impact factor: 2.264

Review 9.  Use and isolation of urinary exosomes as biomarkers for diabetic nephropathy.

Authors:  Luca Musante; Dorota Ewa Tataruch; Harry Holthofer
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2014-09-26       Impact factor: 5.555

10.  Urinary extracellular vesicles for RNA extraction: optimization of a protocol devoid of prokaryote contamination.

Authors:  Dorota Tataruch-Weinert; Luca Musante; Oliver Kretz; Harry Holthofer
Journal:  J Extracell Vesicles       Date:  2016-06-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.