Literature DB >> 23486071

A cervical abnormality risk prediction model: can we use clinical information to predict which patients with ASCUS/LSIL Pap tests will develop CIN 2/3 or AIS?

Brittany M Charlton1, Jenny L Carwile, Karin B Michels, Sarah Feldman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Human papillomavirus (HPV) infections and abnormal Pap test results are common, and most do not progress to cervical cancer. Because it is difficult to predict which mild Pap abnormalities will develop into precancerous lesions, many women undergo painful and costly evaluations and even unnecessary treatment. The objective of this study was to develop a risk prediction model based on clinical and demographic information to identify women most likely to develop significant precancerous lesions (cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grades 2/3 [CIN 2/3] or adenocarcinoma in situ [AIS]) among women with mild Pap abnormalities (atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance/low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Abnormal Pap Smear Registry includes women who received treatment at the Brigham and Women's Hospital/Dana Farber Cancer Institute Pap Smear Evaluation Center beginning in 2006. It includes 1,072 women with mild cervical dysplasia (atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance or low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion) on their referral Pap test. We derived a clinical prediction model to predict the probability of developing CIN 2/3 or AIS using multivariate logistic regression with a split-sample approach.
RESULTS: By the end of the follow-up, 93 of the 1,072 women developed CIN 2/3 or AIS (8.7%). There were several differences between women who developed CIN 2/3 or AIS and women who did not. However, once we put these into the regression model, the only variable that was significantly associated with CIN 2/3 or AIS was having a history of an abnormal Pap or biopsy result (odds ratio = 2.44; 95% CI =1.03-5.76). The resulting prediction model had poor discriminative ability and was poorly calibrated.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite accounting for known risk factors, we were unable to predict individual patients' probability for progression on the basis of available data.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23486071      PMCID: PMC3696437          DOI: 10.1097/LGT.0b013e3182730fec

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Low Genit Tract Dis        ISSN: 1089-2591            Impact factor:   1.925


  19 in total

1.  Goodness-of-fit processes for logistic regression: simulation results.

Authors:  David W Hosmer; Nils Lid Hjort
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2002-09-30       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 2.  Obstetric outcomes after conservative treatment for intraepithelial or early invasive cervical lesions: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  M Kyrgiou; G Koliopoulos; P Martin-Hirsch; M Arbyn; W Prendiville; E Paraskevaidis
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2006-02-11       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  An updated coronary risk profile. A statement for health professionals.

Authors:  K M Anderson; P W Wilson; P M Odell; W B Kannel
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  Prediction of coronary heart disease using risk factor categories.

Authors:  P W Wilson; R B D'Agostino; D Levy; A M Belanger; H Silbershatz; W B Kannel
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1998-05-12       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 5.  Natural history of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a critical review.

Authors:  A G Ostör
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Pathol       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 2.762

6.  The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.

Authors:  J A Hanley; B J McNeil
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 7.  American Cancer Society, American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology, and American Society for Clinical Pathology screening guidelines for the prevention and early detection of cervical cancer.

Authors:  Debbie Saslow; Diane Solomon; Herschel W Lawson; Maureen Killackey; Shalini L Kulasingam; Joanna M Cain; Francisco A R Garcia; Ann T Moriarty; Alan G Waxman; David C Wilbur; Nicolas Wentzensen; Levi S Downs; Mark Spitzer; Anna-Barbara Moscicki; Eduardo L Franco; Mark H Stoler; Mark Schiffman; Philip E Castle; Evan R Myers; David Chelmow; Abbe Herzig; Jane J Kim; Walter Kinney; W Lawson Herschel; Jeffrey Waldman
Journal:  J Low Genit Tract Dis       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 1.925

8.  Cigarette smoking, oncogenic human papillomavirus, Ki-67 antigen, and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.

Authors:  Tiffany G Harris; Shalini L Kulasingam; Nancy B Kiviat; Constance Mao; S Nicholas Agoff; Qinghua Feng; Laura A Koutsky
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2004-05-01       Impact factor: 4.897

Review 9.  Pregnancy outcome after loop electrosurgical excision procedure: a systematic review.

Authors:  Joan M G Crane
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 7.661

10.  Natural history of cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  J Melnikow; J Nuovo; A R Willan; B K Chan; L P Howell
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 7.661

View more
  4 in total

1.  Identification of potential missed opportunities for human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination in women referred to an academic colposcopy clinic for evaluation of abnormal cervical cytology.

Authors:  Benjamin J Dorton; Allison F Vitonis; Sarah Feldman
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2016-02-02       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  HPV prevalence and HPV-related dysplasia in elderly women.

Authors:  Ruth S Hermansson; Matts Olovsson; Emelie Hoxell; Annika K Lindström
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-10       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 3.  Frequency of precancerous changes and cervical cancer recorded in three health centres in tuzla canton in period 2010-2011.

Authors:  Mahira Jahic; Mirsada Mulavdic; Fatima Dautbasic; Mara Fejzic; Elmir Jahic
Journal:  Mater Sociomed       Date:  2013-11-24

4.  Study of 2 years follow-up of referral patients with abnormal Pap smear.

Authors:  Fariba Behnamfar; Azam Zafarbakhsh; Taj-Alsadat Allameh
Journal:  J Res Med Sci       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.852

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.