Literature DB >> 14672487

Pregnancy outcome after loop electrosurgical excision procedure: a systematic review.

Joan M G Crane1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the association of loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) and subsequent pregnancy outcomes. DATA SOURCES: A computerized search of MEDLINE and PubMed was conducted using the keys words "pregnancy" and "loop electrosurgical excision procedure," "LEEP," "LETZ," "LLETZ," or "loop excision." References from identified publications were manually searched and cross referenced to identify additional relevant articles. METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION: Studies were included that compared women who had had LEEP to women who had not had the procedure and that reported on subsequent pregnancy outcomes. Studies were excluded if there was no control group, if the LEEP was performed during the pregnancy, or if only an abstract was available. Five of 36 articles identified met the criteria for systematic review. TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND
RESULTS: Women who had had LEEP were more likely to have preterm birth (odds ratio [OR] 1.81, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.18, 2.76; P = .006) and low birth weight infants (<2500 g) (OR 1.60, 95% CI 1.01, 2.52; P = .04), but there was no difference in cesarean delivery, precipitous labor, labor induction, or neonatal intensive care unit admission. A subgroup analysis including only studies matching for smoking status revealed that preterm birth was still more common in women who had had LEEP (OR 2.53, 95% CI 1.42, 4.49; P = .001), but birth weight under 2500 g was no longer significantly different.
CONCLUSION: LEEP appears to be associated with subsequent preterm birth, even when smoking status is matched. Studies with adequate sample size are needed to further evaluate the relationship of LEEP and preterm birth, controlling for potential confounders, including depth of the tissue sample.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14672487     DOI: 10.1016/s0029-7844(03)00741-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  18 in total

1.  Interval from loop electrosurgical excision procedure to pregnancy and pregnancy outcomes.

Authors:  Shayna N Conner; Alison G Cahill; Methodius G Tuuli; David M Stamilio; Anthony O Odibo; Kimberly A Roehl; George A Macones
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 7.661

2.  Pregnancy outcome after cervical conization: risk factors for preterm delivery and the efficacy of prophylactic cerclage.

Authors:  Ka Hyun Nam; Ja Young Kwon; Young-Han Kim; Yong-Won Park
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2010-12-31       Impact factor: 4.401

3.  See-and-Treat Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure for High-Grade Cervical Cytology: Are We Overtreating?

Authors:  Lindsay M Kuroki; Lauren M Bergeron; Feng Gao; Premal H Thaker; Leslie S Massad
Journal:  J Low Genit Tract Dis       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 1.925

4.  See-and-treat approaches to cervical cancer prevention for HIV-infected women.

Authors:  Carla J Chibwesha; Susan Cu-Uvin
Journal:  Curr HIV/AIDS Rep       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 5.071

Review 5.  Loop electrosurgical excision procedure and risk of preterm birth: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Shayna N Conner; Heather A Frey; Alison G Cahill; George A Macones; Graham A Colditz; Methodius G Tuuli
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 7.661

6.  Loop electrosurgical excision procedure and risk of vaginal infections during pregnancy: an observational study.

Authors:  M J Stout; H A Frey; M G Tuuli; A G Cahill; A O Odibo; K A Roehl; G A Macones
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2014-12-17       Impact factor: 6.531

7.  Loop Electrosurgical Excisional Procedure (LEEP) Done for Discrepancy: Does the Time from HGSIL Affect Pathologic Grade of CIN in LEEP Specimen?

Authors:  Sue L Moreni; Caroline M Mitchell; Rochelle L Garcia; Linda O Eckert
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Int       Date:  2010-06-29

8.  A cervical abnormality risk prediction model: can we use clinical information to predict which patients with ASCUS/LSIL Pap tests will develop CIN 2/3 or AIS?

Authors:  Brittany M Charlton; Jenny L Carwile; Karin B Michels; Sarah Feldman
Journal:  J Low Genit Tract Dis       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 1.925

9.  Risk of cesarean delivery after loop electrosurgical excision procedure.

Authors:  Heather A Frey; Molly J Stout; Anthony O Odibo; David M Stamilio; Alison G Cahill; Kimberly A Roehl; George A Macones
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 7.661

10.  Management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2 in adolescent and young women.

Authors:  Karin Fuchs; Sherry Weitzen; Lily Wu; Maureen G Phipps; Lori A Boardman
Journal:  J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 1.814

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.