Literature DB >> 23485874

Sexual selection hinders adaptation in experimental populations of yeast.

L P Reding1, J P Swaddle, H A Murphy.   

Abstract

Sexual selection, the suite of processes that lead to differential mating success among individuals, probably influences the evolutionary trajectory of populations. Because sexual selection often shifts traits away from their survival optima, strong sexual selection pressures are thought to increase potential for population extinction, especially during environmental change. Sexual selection pressures may also increase the opportunity for speciation by accelerating the generation of pre-zygotic isolation among populations. These relationships remain largely untested experimentally. Here, we allow populations of baker's yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, to evolve for approximately 250 generations with altered sex ratios in order to test the effect of the strength of sexual selection on the fate of populations. We find that populations experiencing stronger sexual selection are less able to adapt to a novel environment compared with populations experiencing weaker sexual selection or no sex, and that strong sexual selection erases the benefits of sexual reproduction. This pattern persists when fitness is assayed in a closely related environment. We also identify a trend that may suggest the beginning of pre-zygotic isolation between populations experiencing stronger sexual selection, though this is not statistically significant. These results highlight the importance of sexual selection in shaping macroevolutionary patterns and biodiversity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23485874      PMCID: PMC3645027          DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2012.1202

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Lett        ISSN: 1744-9561            Impact factor:   3.703


  15 in total

1.  Sexual selection and speciation.

Authors:  T M. Panhuis; R Butlin; M Zuk; T Tregenza
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2001-07-01       Impact factor: 17.712

2.  Sexual selection and the risk of extinction in birds.

Authors:  Edward H Morrow; Trevor E Pitcher
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-09-07       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Sexual selection and speciation in mammals, butterflies and spiders.

Authors:  Matthew J G Gage; Geoffrey A Parker; Soren Nylin; Christer Wiklund
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-11-22       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Courtship in S. cerevisiae: both cell types choose mating partners by responding to the strongest pheromone signal.

Authors:  C L Jackson; L H Hartwell
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1990-11-30       Impact factor: 41.582

5.  Mate choice among yeast gametes can purge deleterious mutations.

Authors:  S J Tazzyman; R M Seymour; A Pomiankowski; D Greig
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2012-05-18       Impact factor: 2.411

6.  Sex increases the efficacy of natural selection in experimental yeast populations.

Authors:  Matthew R Goddard; H Charles J Godfray; Austin Burt
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-03-31       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Sexual selection enhances population extinction in a changing environment.

Authors:  Y Tanaka
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1996-06-07       Impact factor: 2.691

8.  Systematic genetic analysis with ordered arrays of yeast deletion mutants.

Authors:  A H Tong; M Evangelista; A B Parsons; H Xu; G D Bader; N Pagé; M Robinson; S Raghibizadeh; C W Hogue; H Bussey; B Andrews; M Tyers; C Boone
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-12-14       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  The cost of sexual signaling in yeast.

Authors:  Carl Smith; Duncan Greig
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.694

Review 10.  Saccharomyces sensu stricto as a model system for evolution and ecology.

Authors:  Taissa Replansky; Vassiliki Koufopanou; Duncan Greig; Graham Bell
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2008-07-24       Impact factor: 17.712

View more
  3 in total

1.  The effect of sexual selection on adaptation and extinction under increasing temperatures.

Authors:  Jonathan M Parrett; Robert J Knell
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-04-25       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Can sexual selection theory inform genetic management of captive populations? A review.

Authors:  Rémi Chargé; Céline Teplitsky; Gabriele Sorci; Matthew Low
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2014-10-29       Impact factor: 5.183

3.  Correlation between investment in sexual traits and valve sexual dimorphism in Cyprideis species (Ostracoda).

Authors:  Maria João Fernandes Martins; Gene Hunt; Rowan Lockwood; John P Swaddle; David J Horne
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-07-05       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.