Literature DB >> 23485509

Assessment of a modified acoustic lens for electromagnetic shock wave lithotripters in a swine model.

John G Mancini1, Andreas Neisius, Nathan Smith, Georgy Sankin, Gaston M Astroza, Michael E Lipkin, W Neal Simmons, Glenn M Preminger, Pei Zhong.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The acoustic lens of the Modularis electromagnetic shock wave lithotripter (Siemens, Malvern, Pennsylvania) was modified to produce a pressure waveform and focal zone more closely resembling that of the original HM3 device (Dornier Medtech, Wessling, Germany). We assessed the newly designed acoustic lens in vivo in an animal model.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Stone fragmentation and tissue injury produced by the original and modified lenses of the Modularis lithotripter were evaluated in a swine model under equivalent acoustic pulse energy (about 45 mJ) at 1 Hz pulse repetition frequency. Stone fragmentation was determined by the weight percent of stone fragments less than 2 mm. To assess tissue injury, shock wave treated kidneys were perfused, dehydrated, cast in paraffin wax and sectioned. Digital images were captured every 120 μm and processed to determine functional renal volume damage.
RESULTS: After 500 shocks, the mean ± SD stone fragmentation efficiency produced by the original and modified lenses was 48% ± 12% and 52% ± 17%, respectively (p = 0.60). However, after 2,000 shocks, the modified lens showed significantly improved stone fragmentation compared to the original lens (mean 86% ± 10% vs 72% ± 12%, p = 0.02). Tissue injury caused by the original and modified lenses was minimal at a mean of 0.57% ± 0.44% and 0.25% ± 0.25%, respectively (p = 0.27).
CONCLUSIONS: With lens modification the Modularis lithotripter demonstrates significantly improved stone fragmentation with minimal tissue injury at a clinically relevant acoustic pulse energy. This new lens design could potentially be retrofitted to existing lithotripters, improving the effectiveness of electromagnetic lithotripters.
Copyright © 2013 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  AR; EH; EM; PRF; SWL; area ratio; electrohydraulic; electromagnetic; equipment and supplies; kidney; kidney calculi; lenses; lithotripsy; pulse repetition frequency; shock wave lithotripsy

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23485509      PMCID: PMC3742623          DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.02.074

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  25 in total

1.  Dynamics of bubble oscillation in constrained media and mechanisms of vessel rupture in SWL.

Authors:  P Zhong; Y Zhou; S Zhu
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 2.998

Review 2.  Shockwave lithotripsy: anecdotes and insights.

Authors:  James E Lingeman; Samuel C Kim; Ramsay L Kuo; James A McAteer; Andrew P Evan
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 2.942

3.  The first clinical results of "wide-focus and low-pressure" ESWL.

Authors:  W Eisenmenger; X X Du; C Tang; S Zhao; Y Wang; F Rong; D Dai; M Guan; A Qi
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 2.998

4.  Effect of overpressure and pulse repetition frequency on cavitation in shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  Oleg A Sapozhnikov; Vera A Khokhlova; Michael R Bailey; James C Williams; James A McAteer; Robin O Cleveland; Lawrence A Crum
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  A prospective randomized trial comparing 2 lithotriptors for stone disintegration and induced renal trauma.

Authors:  Samuel F Graber; Hansjörg Danuser; Werner W Hochreiter; Urs E Studer
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Wolf Piezolith 2200 versus the modified Dornier HM3. Efficacy and range of indications.

Authors:  J Rassweiler; R Gumpinger; P Bub; H Kohl; A Mayer; F Eisenberger
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 20.096

7.  Acoustic cavitation generated by an extracorporeal shockwave lithotripter.

Authors:  A J Coleman; J E Saunders; L A Crum; M Dyson
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 2.998

Review 8.  Shock wave technology and application: an update.

Authors:  Jens J Rassweiler; Thomas Knoll; Kai-Uwe Köhrmann; James A McAteer; James E Lingeman; Robin O Cleveland; Michael R Bailey; Christian Chaussy
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2011-02-23       Impact factor: 20.096

9.  First clinical experience with extracorporeally induced destruction of kidney stones by shock waves.

Authors:  C Chaussy; E Schmiedt; D Jocham; W Brendel; B Forssmann; V Walther
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  Extracorporeally induced destruction of kidney stones by shock waves.

Authors:  C Chaussy; W Brendel; E Schmiedt
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1980-12-13       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  5 in total

1.  Experimentally validated multiphysics computational model of focusing and shock wave formation in an electromagnetic lithotripter.

Authors:  Daniel E Fovargue; Sorin Mitran; Nathan B Smith; Georgy N Sankin; Walter N Simmons; Pei Zhong
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 2.  Engineering Better Lithotripters.

Authors:  Christian G Chaussy; Hans-Göran Tiselius
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 3.092

3.  Improving the lens design and performance of a contemporary electromagnetic shock wave lithotripter.

Authors:  Andreas Neisius; Nathan B Smith; Georgy Sankin; Nicholas John Kuntz; John Francis Madden; Daniel E Fovargue; Sorin Mitran; Michael Eric Lipkin; Walter Neal Simmons; Glenn M Preminger; Pei Zhong
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-03-17       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Shock wave lithotripsy: the new phoenix?

Authors:  Andreas Neisius; Michael E Lipkin; Jens J Rassweiler; Pei Zhong; Glenn M Preminger; Thomas Knoll
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  Development of an Omnidirectional-Capable Electromagnetic Shock Wave Generator for Lipolysis.

Authors:  Ming Hau Chang; San Yih Lin
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 2.682

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.