Literature DB >> 23481680

Challenges and opportunities in restoring function after paralysis.

P Hunter Peckham1, Kevin L Kilgore.   

Abstract

Neurotechnology has made major advances in development of interfaces to the nervous system that restore function in paralytic disorders. These advances enable both restoration of voluntary function and activation of paralyzed muscles to reanimate movement. The technologies used in each case are different, with external surface stimulation or percutaneous stimulation generally used for restoration of voluntary function, and implanted stimulators generally used for neuroprosthetic restoration. The opportunity to restore function through neuroplasticity has demonstrated significant advances in cases where there are retained neural circuits after the injury, such as spinal cord injury and stroke. In cases where there is a complete loss of voluntary neural control, neural prostheses have demonstrated the capacity to restore movement, control of the bladder and bowel, and respiration and cough. The focus of most clinical studies has been primarily toward activation of paralyzed nerves, but advances in inhibition of neural activity provide additional means of addressing the paralytic complications of pain and spasticity, and these techniques are now reaching the clinic. Future clinical advances necessitate having a better understanding of the underlying mechanisms, and having more precise neural interfaces that will ultimately allow individual nerve fibers or groups of nerve fibers to be controlled with specificity and reliability. While electrical currents have been the primary means of interfacing to the nervous system to date, optical and magnetic techniques under development are beginning to reach the clinic, and provide great opportunity. Ultimately, techniques that combine approaches are likely to be the most effective means for restoring function, for example combining regeneration and neural plasticity to maximize voluntary activity, combined with neural prostheses to augment the voluntary activity to functional levels of performance. It is a substantial challenge to bring any of these techniques through clinical trials, but as each of the individual techniques is sufficiently developed to reach the clinic, these present great opportunities for enabling patients with paralytic disorders to achieve substantial independence and restore their quality of life.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23481680      PMCID: PMC4046583          DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2013.2245128

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng        ISSN: 0018-9294            Impact factor:   4.538


  15 in total

1.  Durability of implanted electrodes and leads in an upper-limb neuroprosthesis.

Authors:  Kevin L Kilgore; P Hunter Peckham; Michael W Keith; Fred W Montague; Ronald L Hart; Martha M Gazdik; Anne M Bryden; Scott A Snyder; Thomas G Stage
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2003 Nov-Dec

2.  High-frequency electrical conduction block of mammalian peripheral motor nerve.

Authors:  Niloy Bhadra; Kevin L Kilgore
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.217

3.  An implanted upper-extremity neuroprosthesis using myoelectric control.

Authors:  Kevin L Kilgore; Harry A Hoyen; Anne M Bryden; Ronald L Hart; Michael W Keith; P Hunter Peckham
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.230

4.  Twenty years of experience in phrenic nerve stimulation to pace the diaphragm.

Authors:  W W Glenn; M L Phelps; J A Elefteriades; B Dentz; J F Hogan
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 1.976

5.  Effect of epidural stimulation of the lumbosacral spinal cord on voluntary movement, standing, and assisted stepping after motor complete paraplegia: a case study.

Authors:  Susan Harkema; Yury Gerasimenko; Jonathan Hodes; Joel Burdick; Claudia Angeli; Yangsheng Chen; Christie Ferreira; Andrea Willhite; Enrico Rejc; Robert G Grossman; V Reggie Edgerton
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2011-05-19       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Functional electrical stimulation for walking in paraplegia.

Authors:  E B Marsolais; R Kobetic
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 7.  The sacral anterior root stimulator as a means of managing the bladder in patients with spinal cord lesions.

Authors:  G S Brindley
Journal:  Baillieres Clin Neurol       Date:  1995-04

8.  Contralaterally controlled functional electrical stimulation for upper extremity hemiplegia: an early-phase randomized clinical trial in subacute stroke patients.

Authors:  Jayme S Knutson; Mary Y Harley; Terri Z Hisel; Shannon D Hogan; Margaret M Maloney; John Chae
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2011-08-29       Impact factor: 3.919

9.  Targeting recovery: priorities of the spinal cord-injured population.

Authors:  Kim D Anderson
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 5.269

10.  Lower thoracic spinal cord stimulation to restore cough in patients with spinal cord injury: results of a National Institutes of Health-sponsored clinical trial. Part I: methodology and effectiveness of expiratory muscle activation.

Authors:  Anthony F DiMarco; Krzysztof E Kowalski; Robert T Geertman; Dana R Hromyak
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 3.966

View more
  17 in total

Review 1.  Functional electrical stimulation and spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Chester H Ho; Ronald J Triolo; Anastasia L Elias; Kevin L Kilgore; Anthony F DiMarco; Kath Bogie; Albert H Vette; Musa L Audu; Rudi Kobetic; Sarah R Chang; K Ming Chan; Sean Dukelow; Dennis J Bourbeau; Steven W Brose; Kenneth J Gustafson; Zelma H T Kiss; Vivian K Mushahwar
Journal:  Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 1.784

2.  Validation of electrical stimulation models: intracellular calcium measurement in three-dimensional scaffolds.

Authors:  Robert D Adams; Brinda Gupta; Amy B Harkins
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-06-07       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 3.  Neurophysiology and neural engineering: a review.

Authors:  Arthur Prochazka
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Alteration of neural action potential patterns by axonal stimulation: the importance of stimulus location.

Authors:  Patrick E Crago; Nathaniel S Makowski
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 5.379

5.  High-definition transcranial direct current stimulation induces both acute and persistent changes in broadband cortical synchronization: a simultaneous tDCS-EEG study.

Authors:  Abhrajeet Roy; Bryan Baxter; Bin He
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 4.538

Review 6.  Brain-controlled neuromuscular stimulation to drive neural plasticity and functional recovery.

Authors:  C Ethier; J A Gallego; L E Miller
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2015-03-28       Impact factor: 6.627

7.  Modeling the interactions between stimulation and physiologically induced APs in a mammalian nerve fiber: dependence on frequency and fiber diameter.

Authors:  Vijay Sadashivaiah; Pierre Sacré; Yun Guan; William S Anderson; Sridevi V Sarma
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2018-11-15       Impact factor: 1.621

Review 8.  Brain-controlled muscle stimulation for the restoration of motor function.

Authors:  Christian Ethier; Lee E Miller
Journal:  Neurobiol Dis       Date:  2014-10-28       Impact factor: 5.996

9.  Method for positioning and rehabilitation training with the ExoAtlet ® powered exoskeleton.

Authors:  Carla Pais-Vieira; Mehrab Allahdad; João Neves-Amado; André Perrotta; Edgard Morya; Renan Moioli; Elena Shapkova; Miguel Pais-Vieira
Journal:  MethodsX       Date:  2020-03-19

10.  Intraspinal microstimulation produces over-ground walking in anesthetized cats.

Authors:  B J Holinski; K A Mazurek; D G Everaert; A Toossi; A M Lucas-Osma; P Troyk; R Etienne-Cummings; R B Stein; V K Mushahwar
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2016-09-13       Impact factor: 5.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.