Literature DB >> 23479323

Impact of a multiple mice holder on quantitation of high-throughput MicroPET imaging with and without Ct attenuation correction.

Frezghi Habte1, Gang Ren, Timothy C Doyle, Hongguang Liu, Zhen Cheng, David S Paik.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of scanning multiple mice simultaneously on image quantitation, relative to single mouse scans on both a micro-positron emission tomography/computed tomography (microPET/CT) scanner (which utilizes CT-based attenuation correction to the PET reconstruction) and a dedicated microPET scanner using an inexpensive mouse holder "hotel."
METHODS: We developed a simple mouse holder made from common laboratory items that allows scanning multiple mice simultaneously. It is also compatible with different imaging modalities to allow multiple mice and multi-modality imaging. For this study, we used a radiotracer ((64)Cu-GB170) with a relatively long half-life (12.7 h), selected to allow scanning at times after tracer uptake reaches steady state. This also reduces the effect of decay between sequential imaging studies, although the standard decay corrections were performed. The imaging was also performed using a common tracer, 2-deoxy-2-[(18) F]fluoro-D-glucose (FDG), although the faster decay and faster pharmacokinetics of FDG may introduce greater biological variations due to differences in injection-to-scan timing. We first scanned cylindrical mouse phantoms (50 ml tubes) both in a groups of four at a time (multiple mice mode) and then individually (single mouse mode), using microPET/CT and microPET scanners to validate the process. Then, we imaged a first set of four mice with subcutaneous tumors (C2C12Ras) in both single- and multiple-mice imaging modes. Later, a second set of four normal mice were injected with FDG and scanned 1 h post-injection. Immediately after completion of the scans, ex vivo biodistribution studies were performed on all animals to provide a "gold-standard" to compare quantitative values obtained from PET. A semi-automatic threshold-based region of interest tool was used to minimize operator variability during image analysis.
RESULTS: Phantom studies showed less than 4.5 % relative error difference between the single- and multiple-mice imaging modes of PET imaging with CT-based attenuation correction and 18.4 % without CT-based attenuation correction. In vivo animal studies (n = 4) showed <5 % (for (64)Cu, p > 0.686) and <15 % (for FDG, p > 0.4 except for brain image data p = 0.029) relative mean difference with respect to percent injected dose per gram (%ID/gram) between the single- and multiple-mice microPET imaging mode when CT-based attenuation correction is performed. Without CT-based attenuation correction, we observed relative mean differences of about 11 % for (64)Cu and 15 % for FDG.
CONCLUSION: Our results confirmed the potential use of a microPET/CT scanner for multiple mice simultaneous imaging without significant sacrifice in quantitative accuracy as well as in image quality. Thus, the use of the mouse "hotel" is an aid to increasing instrument throughput on small animal scanners with minimal loss of quantitative accuracy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23479323      PMCID: PMC5247256          DOI: 10.1007/s11307-012-0602-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol        ISSN: 1536-1632            Impact factor:   3.488


  21 in total

1.  Considerations for laboratory animal imaging center design and setup.

Authors:  Brenda A Klaunberg; Judith A Davis
Journal:  ILAR J       Date:  2008

Review 2.  A review of imaging agent development.

Authors:  Eric D Agdeppa; Mary E Spilker
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2009-05-05       Impact factor: 4.009

3.  Applications of molecular imaging in drug discovery and development process.

Authors:  Byeong-Cheol Ahn
Journal:  Curr Pharm Biotechnol       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 2.837

Review 4.  Advances in imaging mouse tumour models in vivo.

Authors:  Scott K Lyons
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 7.996

Review 5.  Systems biology through mouse imaging centers: experience and new directions.

Authors:  R Mark Henkelman
Journal:  Annu Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2010-08-15       Impact factor: 9.590

6.  Multiple-mouse MRI.

Authors:  Nicholas A Bock; Norman B Konyer; R Mark Henkelman
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 4.668

7.  A comparison of imaging techniques to monitor tumor growth and cancer progression in living animals.

Authors:  Anne-Laure Puaux; Lai Chun Ong; Yi Jin; Irvin Teh; Michelle Hong; Pierce K H Chow; Xavier Golay; Jean-Pierre Abastado
Journal:  Int J Mol Imaging       Date:  2011-11-10

8.  Multimodality imaging of β-cells in mouse models of type 1 and 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Jing Yong; Julia Rasooly; Hoa Dang; Yuxin Lu; Blake Middleton; Zesong Zhang; Larry Hon; Mohammad Namavari; David B Stout; Mark A Atkinson; Jide Tian; Sanjiv Sam Gambhir; Daniel L Kaufman
Journal:  Diabetes       Date:  2011-03-25       Impact factor: 9.461

9.  Non-invasive imaging of cysteine cathepsin activity in solid tumors using a 64Cu-labeled activity-based probe.

Authors:  Gang Ren; Galia Blum; Martijn Verdoes; Hongguang Liu; Salahuddin Syed; Laura E Edgington; Olivier Gheysens; Zheng Miao; Han Jiang; Sanjiv Sam Gambhir; Matthew Bogyo; Zhen Cheng
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-11-21       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Imaging gene delivery in a mouse model of congenital neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis.

Authors:  L S Pike; B A Tannous; N C Deliolanis; G Hsich; D Morse; C-H Tung; M Sena-Esteves; X O Breakefield
Journal:  Gene Ther       Date:  2011-09-08       Impact factor: 5.250

View more
  10 in total

1.  Dragon fruit-like biocage as an iron trapping nanoplatform for high efficiency targeted cancer multimodality imaging.

Authors:  Min Yang; Quli Fan; Ruiping Zhang; Kai Cheng; Junjie Yan; Donghui Pan; Xiaowei Ma; Alex Lu; Zhen Cheng
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2015-08-05       Impact factor: 12.479

2.  The relationship between serial [(18) F]PBR06 PET imaging of microglial activation and motor function following stroke in mice.

Authors:  Frederick M Lartey; G-One Ahn; Rehan Ali; Sahar Rosenblum; Zheng Miao; Natasha Arksey; Bin Shen; Marta Vilalta Colomer; Marjan Rafat; Hongguang Liu; Miguel A Alejandre-Alcazar; John W Chen; Theo Palmer; Frederick T Chin; Raphael Guzman; Billy W Loo; Edward Graves
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 3.488

3.  Simultaneous ECG-gated PET imaging of multiple mice.

Authors:  Jurgen Seidel; Marcelino L Bernardo; Karen J Wong; Biying Xu; Mark R Williams; Frank Kuo; Elaine M Jagoda; Falguni Basuli; Changhui Li; Gary L Griffiths; Michael V Green; Peter L Choyke
Journal:  Nucl Med Biol       Date:  2014-03-29       Impact factor: 2.408

4.  Assessment of viability of human fat injection into nude mice with micro-computed tomography.

Authors:  David A Atashroo; Kevin J Paik; Michael T Chung; Adrian McArdle; Kshemendra Senarath-Yapa; Elizabeth R Zielins; Ruth Tevlin; Christopher R Duldulao; Graham G Walmsley; Taylor Wearda; Owen Marecic; Michael T Longaker; Derrick C Wan
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2015-01-07       Impact factor: 1.355

5.  The Gift of Light: Using Multiplexed Optical Imaging to Probe Cardiac Metabolism in Health and Disease.

Authors:  Mirwais Wardak; Patricia K Nguyen
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 7.792

6.  High-throughput multiple-mouse imaging with micro-PET/CT for whole-skeleton assessment.

Authors:  Masashi Yagi; Luke Arentsen; Ryan M Shanley; Susanta K Hui
Journal:  Phys Med       Date:  2014-07-03       Impact factor: 2.685

7.  PET Imaging of Estrogen Receptors Using 18F-Based Radioligands.

Authors:  Manoj Kumar; Kelley Salem; Justin J Jeffery; Amy M Fowler
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

8.  Effects of common anesthetic agents on [18F]flumazenil binding to the GABAA receptor.

Authors:  Mikael Palner; Corinne Beinat; Sam Banister; Francesca Zanderigo; Jun Hyung Park; Bin Shen; Trine Hjoernevik; Jae Ho Jung; Byung Chul Lee; Sang Eun Kim; Lawrence Fung; Frederick T Chin
Journal:  EJNMMI Res       Date:  2016-11-08       Impact factor: 3.138

9.  A novel tracer for in vivo optical imaging of fatty acid metabolism in the heart and brown adipose tissue.

Authors:  Marcello Panagia; Jing Yang; Eric Gale; Huan Wang; Ivan Luptak; Howard H Chen; Dakshesh Patel; Dominique Croteau; David Richard Pimentel; Markus Michael Bachschmid; Wilson S Colucci; Chongzhao Ran; David E Sosnovik
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-07-08       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  High-Throughput PET/CT Imaging Using a Multiple-Mouse Imaging System.

Authors:  Hannah E Greenwood; Zoltan Nyitrai; Gabor Mocsai; Sandor Hobor; Timothy H Witney
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2019-09-13       Impact factor: 10.057

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.