Literature DB >> 25590561

Assessment of viability of human fat injection into nude mice with micro-computed tomography.

David A Atashroo1, Kevin J Paik1, Michael T Chung1, Adrian McArdle1, Kshemendra Senarath-Yapa1, Elizabeth R Zielins1, Ruth Tevlin1, Christopher R Duldulao1, Graham G Walmsley1, Taylor Wearda1, Owen Marecic1, Michael T Longaker2, Derrick C Wan3.   

Abstract

Lipotransfer is a vital tool in the surgeon's armamentarium for the treatment of soft tissue deficits of throughout the body. Fat is the ideal soft tissue filler as it is readily available, easily obtained, inexpensive, and inherently biocompatible.(1) However, despite its burgeoning popularity, fat grafting is hampered by unpredictable results and variable graft survival, with published retention rates ranging anywhere from 10-80%. (1-3) To facilitate investigations on fat grafting, we have therefore developed an animal model that allows for real-time analysis of injected fat volume retention. Briefly, a small cut is made in the scalp of a CD-1 nude mouse and 200-400 µl of processed lipoaspirate is placed over the skull. The scalp is chosen as the recipient site because of its absence of native subcutaneous fat, and because of the excellent background contrast provided by the calvarium, which aids in the analysis process. Micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) is used to scan the graft at baseline and every two weeks thereafter. The CT images are reconstructed, and an imaging software is used to quantify graft volumes. Traditionally, techniques to assess fat graft volume have necessitated euthanizing the study animal to provide just a single assessment of graft weight and volume by physical measurement ex vivo. Biochemical and histological comparisons have likewise required the study animal to be euthanized. This described imaging technique offers the advantage of visualizing and objectively quantifying volume at multiple time points after initial grafting without having to sacrifice the study animal. The technique is limited by the size of the graft able to be injected as larger grafts risk skin and fat necrosis. This method has utility for all studies evaluating fat graft viability and volume retention. It is particularly well-suited to providing a visual representation of fat grafts and following changes in volume over time.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25590561      PMCID: PMC4354500          DOI: 10.3791/52217

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis Exp        ISSN: 1940-087X            Impact factor:   1.355


  25 in total

Review 1.  Structural fat grafts: the ideal filler?

Authors:  S R Coleman
Journal:  Clin Plast Surg       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 2.017

2.  Autologous fat transfer national consensus survey: trends in techniques for harvest, preparation, and application, and perception of short- and long-term results.

Authors:  Matthew R Kaufman; James P Bradley; Brian Dickinson; Justin B Heller; Kristy Wasson; Catherine O'Hara; Catherine Huang; Joubin Gabbay; Kiu Ghadjar; Timothy A Miller
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 3.  The science of autologous fat grafting: views on current and future approaches to neoadipogenesis.

Authors:  Louis P Bucky; Ivona Percec
Journal:  Aesthet Surg J       Date:  2008 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.283

Review 4.  Soft tissue coverage in abdominal wall reconstruction.

Authors:  Donald P Baumann; Charles E Butler
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 2.741

5.  A murine model for studying diffusely injected human fat.

Authors:  Vishal D Thanik; Christopher C Chang; Oren Z Lerman; Robert J Allen; Phuong D Nguyen; Pierre B Saadeh; Stephen M Warren; Jamie P Levine; Sydney R Coleman; Alexes Hazen
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 4.730

6.  The impact of liposuction cannula size on adipocyte viability.

Authors:  John C Kirkham; Jeffrey H Lee; Miguel A Medina; Michael C McCormack; Mark A Randolph; William G Austen
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 1.539

7.  Multilineage cells from human adipose tissue: implications for cell-based therapies.

Authors:  P A Zuk; M Zhu; H Mizuno; J Huang; J W Futrell; A J Katz; P Benhaim; H P Lorenz; M H Hedrick
Journal:  Tissue Eng       Date:  2001-04

Review 8.  Injectable soft-tissue fillers: clinical overview.

Authors:  Barry L Eppley; Babak Dadvand
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2006-09-15       Impact factor: 4.730

9.  The effect of pressure and shear on autologous fat grafting.

Authors:  Jeffrey H Lee; John C Kirkham; Michael C McCormack; Alexa M Nicholls; Mark A Randolph; William G Austen
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 4.730

10.  Assessing the long-term viability of facial fat grafts: an objective measure using computed tomography.

Authors:  Joan Fontdevila; Jose Maria Serra-Renom; Mauricio Raigosa; Joan Berenguer; Eva Guisantes; Eduardo Prades; Jesus Benito-Ruiz; Esteban Martinez
Journal:  Aesthet Surg J       Date:  2008 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.283

View more
  4 in total

1.  Purified Adipose-Derived Stromal Cells Provide Superior Fat Graft Retention Compared with Unenriched Stromal Vascular Fraction.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Zielins; Elizabeth A Brett; Charles P Blackshear; John Flacco; Ryan C Ransom; Michael T Longaker; Derrick C Wan
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 2.  Experimental In-Vivo Models Used in Fat Grafting Research for Volume Augmentation in Soft Tissue Reconstruction.

Authors:  Jorge Lujan-Hernandez; Raghu Appasani; Kylee Sullivan; Leah Siegel-Reamer; Janice F Lalikos
Journal:  Arch Plast Surg       Date:  2017-09-15

3.  Magnetic Nanoparticle-Based Upregulation of B-Cell Lymphoma 2 Enhances Bone Regeneration.

Authors:  Elizabeth Brett; Elizabeth R Zielins; Anna Luan; Chin Chun Ooi; Siny Shailendra; David Atashroo; Siddarth Menon; Charles Blackshear; John Flacco; Natalina Quarto; Shan X Wang; Michael T Longaker; Derrick C Wan
Journal:  Stem Cells Transl Med       Date:  2016-08-02       Impact factor: 6.940

4.  Laser-assisted Lipolysis Burn Safety: Proposed Detailed Parameters with Assessment of Their Efficacy and Safety.

Authors:  Yasser Helmy Ali
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2018-10-03
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.