OBJECTIVE: To examine the association of obesity with the prebiopsy prostate-specific antigen (PSA), Gleason score, clinical stage, and D'Amico tumor risk in 2 independent cohorts of men with prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of men with biopsy-proven prostate cancer from California's Improving Access, Counseling and Treatment for Californians with Prostate Cancer program and from a random sample of men treated at the University of Michigan. We performed multivariate analyses to examine the relationship of body mass index (BMI) with the prebiopsy PSA level, Gleason score, clinical stage, and D'Amico tumor risk, while controlling for demographics. RESULTS: The mean age was 61.5 years, and the median prebiopsy PSA level was 6.7 ng/mL. Greater than 70% of men were at least overweight. On univariate analysis, the BMI was not associated with prebiopsy PSA levels, Gleason score, or D'Amico tumor risk. On multivariate analysis, we found no association between BMI and log-transformed PSA, Gleason score, clinical T stage, or D'Amico risk. Advancing age was associated with a greater risk of a higher prebiopsy PSA level, Gleason score, and D'Amico tumor risk. CONCLUSION: Obese men with prostate cancer were no more likely to have a higher prebiopsy PSA level, Gleason score, clinical T stage, or D'Amico risk than those of normal weight. Although we do not know whether the BMI affected the prebiopsy PSA values in those without a diagnosis of prostate cancer, our findings suggest that the BMI does not affect the interpretation of the prebiopsy PSA levels in those with cancer.
OBJECTIVE: To examine the association of obesity with the prebiopsy prostate-specific antigen (PSA), Gleason score, clinical stage, and D'Amico tumor risk in 2 independent cohorts of men with prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of men with biopsy-proven prostate cancer from California's Improving Access, Counseling and Treatment for Californians with Prostate Cancer program and from a random sample of men treated at the University of Michigan. We performed multivariate analyses to examine the relationship of body mass index (BMI) with the prebiopsy PSA level, Gleason score, clinical stage, and D'Amico tumor risk, while controlling for demographics. RESULTS: The mean age was 61.5 years, and the median prebiopsy PSA level was 6.7 ng/mL. Greater than 70% of men were at least overweight. On univariate analysis, the BMI was not associated with prebiopsy PSA levels, Gleason score, or D'Amico tumor risk. On multivariate analysis, we found no association between BMI and log-transformed PSA, Gleason score, clinical T stage, or D'Amico risk. Advancing age was associated with a greater risk of a higher prebiopsy PSA level, Gleason score, and D'Amico tumor risk. CONCLUSION:Obesemen with prostate cancer were no more likely to have a higher prebiopsy PSA level, Gleason score, clinical T stage, or D'Amico risk than those of normal weight. Although we do not know whether the BMI affected the prebiopsy PSA values in those without a diagnosis of prostate cancer, our findings suggest that the BMI does not affect the interpretation of the prebiopsy PSA levels in those with cancer.
Authors: Jacques Baillargeon; Brad H Pollock; Alan R Kristal; Patrick Bradshaw; Javier Hernandez; Joseph Basler; Betsy Higgins; Steve Lynch; Thomas Rozanski; Dean Troyer; Ian Thompson Journal: Cancer Date: 2005-03-01 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: S O Andersson; A Wolk; R Bergström; H O Adami; G Engholm; A Englund; O Nyrén Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 1997-03-05 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Ian M Thompson; Robin Leach; Dean Troyer; Brad Pollock; Susan Naylor; Betsy Higgins Journal: Urol Oncol Date: 2004 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 3.498
Authors: A V D'Amico; R Whittington; S B Malkowicz; D Schultz; K Blank; G A Broderick; J E Tomaszewski; A A Renshaw; I Kaplan; C J Beard; A Wein Journal: JAMA Date: 1998-09-16 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Robert J MacInnis; Dallas R English; Dorota M Gertig; John L Hopper; Graham G Giles Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2003-12 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Rhonda Arthur; Henrik Møller; Hans Garmo; Lars Holmberg; Pår Stattin; Håkan Malmstrom; Mats Lambe; Niklas Hammar; Göran Walldius; David Robinson; Ingmar Jungner; Mieke Van Hemelrijck Journal: Cancer Med Date: 2016-02-29 Impact factor: 4.452
Authors: Sean Harrison; Kate Tilling; Emma L Turner; Richard M Martin; Rosie Lennon; J Athene Lane; Jenny L Donovan; Freddie C Hamdy; David E Neal; J L H Ruud Bosch; Hayley E Jones Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 2020-03-11 Impact factor: 2.506
Authors: Jeannette L Salgado-Montilla; Jorge L Rodríguez-Cabán; Jonathan Sánchez-García; Ricardo Sánchez-Ortiz; Margarita Irizarry-Ramírez Journal: Arch Cancer Res Date: 2017-08-22