Literature DB >> 21480201

Comorbidity and competing risks for mortality in men with prostate cancer.

Timothy J Daskivich1, Karim Chamie, Lorna Kwan, Jessica Labo, Atreya Dash, Sheldon Greenfield, Mark S Litwin.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Accurate estimation of life expectancy is essential for men deciding between aggressive and conservative treatment of prostate cancer. The authors sought to assess the competing risks of nonprostate cancer and prostate cancer mortality among men with differing Charlson comorbidity index scores and tumor risks.
METHODS: The authors conducted a retrospective study of 1482 men with nonmetastatic prostate cancer diagnosed from 1997 to 2004 at the Greater Los Angeles and Long Beach Veterans Affairs Medical Centers. They performed Kaplan-Meier and competing risks regression analyses to assess survival outcomes.
RESULTS: After a mean follow-up of 6.0 years, 370 (25%) men died from other causes, whereas 44 (3%) died of prostate cancer. At 10 years after diagnosis, men with Charlson scores 0, 1, 2, and 3+ had nonprostate cancer mortality rates of 17%, 34%, 52%, and 74%, respectively. In competing risks regression analysis, each point increase in Charlson score was associated with a 2-fold increase in hazard of nonprostate mortality. Men with Charlson 3+ had 8.5× the hazard of death from other causes, compared with men with the lowest scores (subhazard ratio, 8.5; 95% confidence interval, 6.2-11.7). After stratification by tumor risk, nonprostate mortality rates remained markedly elevated among men with higher Charlson scores, whereas prostate cancer mortality was rare, especially among low-risk and intermediate-risk groups (0.4%, 3%, and 8% for low, intermediate, and high risk, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: Men with the highest Charlson scores should consider conservative management of low-risk and intermediate-risk tumors, given their exceedingly high risk of death from other causes and low risk of prostate cancer mortality.
Copyright © 2011 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21480201     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.26104

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  39 in total

1.  Are Elderly Patients With Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer Overtreated? Exploring Heterogeneity in Survival Effects.

Authors:  Anirban Basu; John L Gore
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 2.983

2.  Competing risk survival analysis in patients with symptomatic Waldenström macroglobulinemia: the impact of disease unrelated mortality and of rituximab-based primary therapy.

Authors:  Efstathios Kastritis; Marie-Christine Kyrtsonis; Pierre Morel; Maria Gavriatopoulou; Evdoxia Hatjiharissi; Argirios S Symeonidis; Amalia Vassou; Panagiotis Repousis; Sossana Delimpasi; Anastasia Sioni; Evrydiki Michalis; Michail Michael; Elina Vervessou; Michael Voulgarelis; Costantinos Tsatalas; Evangelos Terpos; Meletios A Dimopoulos
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2015-08-20       Impact factor: 9.941

3.  Age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index is a significant prognostic factor for long-term survival of patients with high-risk prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy: a Bayesian model averaging approach.

Authors:  Joo Yong Lee; Ho Won Kang; Koon Ho Rha; Nam Hoon Cho; Young Deuk Choi; Sung Joon Hong; Kang Su Cho
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-12-12       Impact factor: 4.553

4.  Prostate-specific antigen testing after the US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation: a population-based analysis of electronic health data.

Authors:  Daniel M Frendl; Mara M Epstein; Hassan Fouayzi; Richard Krajenta; Benjamin A Rybicki; Mitchell H Sokoloff
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2020-06-17       Impact factor: 2.506

5.  Are HIV-infected men vulnerable to prostate cancer treatment disparities?

Authors:  Adam B Murphy; Ramona Bhatia; Iman K Martin; David A Klein; Courtney M P Hollowell; Yaw Nyame; Elodi Dielubanza; Chad Achenbach; Rick A Kittles
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2014-07-25       Impact factor: 4.254

6.  Prostate cancer: Estimated life expectancy: integration of age and comorbidities.

Authors:  Axel Heidenreich; David Pfister
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 14.432

7.  Digoxin and 30-Day All-Cause Readmission in Long-Term Care Residents Hospitalized for Heart Failure.

Authors:  Helen M Sheriff; Manik R Thogaripally; Gurusher Panjrath; Cherinne Arundel; Qing Zeng; Gregg C Fonarow; Javed Butler; Ross D Fletcher; Charity Morgan; Marc R Blackman; Prakash Deedwania; Thomas E Love; Wilbert S Aronow; Stefan D Anker; Richard M Allman; Ali Ahmed
Journal:  J Am Med Dir Assoc       Date:  2017-05-11       Impact factor: 4.669

Review 8.  Risk-based prostate cancer screening: who and how?

Authors:  Allison S Glass; K Clint Cary; Matthew R Cooperberg
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 3.092

9.  Consideration of comorbidity in risk stratification prior to prostate biopsy.

Authors:  Michael A Liss; John Billimek; Kathryn Osann; Jane Cho; Ross Moskowitz; Adam Kaplan; Richard J Szabo; Sherrie H Kaplan; Sheldon Greenfield; Atreya Dash
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2013-04-25       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Current impact of age and comorbidity assessment on prostate cancer treatment choice and over/undertreatment risk.

Authors:  Pierre Lunardi; Guillaume Ploussard; Pascale Grosclaude; Mathieu Roumiguié; Michel Soulié; Jean Baptiste Beauval; Bernard Malavaud
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2016-07-21       Impact factor: 4.226

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.