Literature DB >> 28842243

The differential effects of unihemispheric and bihemispheric tDCS over the inferior frontal gyrus on proactive control.

Jorge Leite1, Óscar F Gonçalves2, Patrícia Pereira3, Niranjan Khadka4, Marom Bikson4, Felipe Fregni5, Sandra Carvalho2.   

Abstract

This study examined the effects of bihemispheric and unihemispheric transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) over the inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) on proactive control. Sixteen participants were randomized to receive (i) bihemispheric tDCS, with a 35cm2 anodal electrode of the right IFG and a 35cm2 cathode electrode of left IFG or (ii) unihemispheric tDCS, with a 35cm2 anodal electrode of the right IFG and a 100cm2 electrode of the left IFG or (iii) sham tDCS, while performing a prepotent inhibition task. There were significant speed-accuracy tradeoff effects in terms of switch costs: unihemispheric tDCS significantly decreased the accuracy when compared to bihemispheric, and sham tDCS, while increased response time when comparing to bihemispheric and sham tDCS. The computational model showed a symmetrical field intensity for the bihemispheric tDCS montage, and an asymmetrical for the unihemispheric tDCS montage. This study confirms that unihemispheric tDCS over the rIFG has a significant impact on response inhibition. The lack of results of bihemispheric tDCS brings two important findings for this study: (i) left IFG seems to be also critically associated with inhibitory response control, and (ii) these results highlight the importance of considering the dual effects of tDCS when choosing the electrode montage.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ireland Ltd and Japan Neuroscience Society. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bihemispheric tDCS; Prepotent behavior; Proactive control; Right inferior frontal gyrus; Unihemispheric tDCS

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28842243      PMCID: PMC5972675          DOI: 10.1016/j.neures.2017.08.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosci Res        ISSN: 0168-0102            Impact factor:   3.304


  52 in total

1.  Prefrontal-subcortical dissociations underlying inhibitory control revealed by event-related fMRI.

Authors:  A M Clare Kelly; Robert Hester; Kevin Murphy; Daniel C Javitt; John J Foxe; Hugh Garavan
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.386

Review 2.  Inhibition and the right inferior frontal cortex.

Authors:  Adam R Aron; Trevor W Robbins; Russell A Poldrack
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 20.229

Review 3.  tDCS polarity effects in motor and cognitive domains: a meta-analytical review.

Authors:  Liron Jacobson; Meni Koslowsky; Michal Lavidor
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Behavioral effects of transcranial pulsed current stimulation (tPCS): Speed-accuracy tradeoff in attention switching task.

Authors:  Leon Morales-Quezada; Jorge Leite; Sandra Carvalho; Laura Castillo-Saavedra; Camila Cosmo; Felipe Fregni
Journal:  Neurosci Res       Date:  2016-02-03       Impact factor: 3.304

Review 5.  Noninvasive brain stimulation for addiction medicine: From monitoring to modulation.

Authors:  Fatemeh Yavari; Alireza Shahbabaie; Jorge Leite; Sandra Carvalho; Hamed Ekhtiari; Felipe Fregni
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  2015-11-04       Impact factor: 2.453

6.  Lateral and medial hypofrontality in first-episode schizophrenia: functional activity in a medication-naive state and effects of short-term atypical antipsychotic treatment.

Authors:  Beth E Snitz; Angus MacDonald; Jonathan D Cohen; Raymond Y Cho; Theresa Becker; Cameron S Carter
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 18.112

7.  Computational models of transcranial direct current stimulation.

Authors:  Marom Bikson; Asif Rahman; Abhishek Datta
Journal:  Clin EEG Neurosci       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 1.843

8.  Sustained excitability elevations induced by transcranial DC motor cortex stimulation in humans.

Authors:  M A Nitsche; W Paulus
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2001-11-27       Impact factor: 9.910

9.  A finite element analysis of the effect of electrode area and inter-electrode distance on the spatial distribution of the current density in tDCS.

Authors:  Paula Faria; Mark Hallett; Pedro Cavaleiro Miranda
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 5.379

10.  The impact of transcranial direct current stimulation on inhibitory control in young adults.

Authors:  Andrea M Loftus; Ozgur Yalcin; Frank D Baughman; Eric J Vanman; Martin S Hagger
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2015-03-19       Impact factor: 2.708

View more
  8 in total

1.  Mindfulness-Based Relapse Prevention and Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation to Reduce Heavy Drinking: A Double-Blind Sham-Controlled Randomized Trial.

Authors:  Katie Witkiewitz; Elena R Stein; Victoria R Votaw; Adam D Wilson; Corey R Roos; Stevi J Gallegos; Vincent P Clark; Eric D Claus
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2019-05-09       Impact factor: 3.455

2.  Neurocapillary-Modulation.

Authors:  Niranjan Khadka; Marom Bikson
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  2020-12-19

3.  Polarity Specific Effects of Cross-Hemispheric tDCS Coupled With Approach-Avoidance Training on Chocolate Craving.

Authors:  Sandra Carvalho; Adriana Sampaio; Augusto J Mendes; Alberto Lema; Daniela Vieira; Óscar F Gonçalves; Jorge Leite
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2019-01-24       Impact factor: 5.810

4.  The effects of direct current stimulation and random noise stimulation on attention networks.

Authors:  Alberto Lema; Sandra Carvalho; Felipe Fregni; Óscar F Gonçalves; Jorge Leite
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-18       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Enriched Rehabilitation Improves Gait Disorder and Cognitive Function in Parkinson's Disease: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Xin Wang; LanLan Chen; Hongyu Zhou; Yao Xu; Hongying Zhang; Wenrui Yang; XiaoJia Tang; Junya Wang; Yichen Lv; Ping Yan; Yuan Peng
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-12-02       Impact factor: 4.677

6.  Portable Neuroimaging-Guided Noninvasive Brain Stimulation of the Cortico-Cerebello-Thalamo-Cortical Loop-Hypothesis and Theory in Cannabis Use Disorder.

Authors:  Pushpinder Walia; Abhishek Ghosh; Shubhmohan Singh; Anirban Dutta
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2022-03-26

Review 7.  From adults to pediatrics: A review noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS) to facilitate recovery from brain injury.

Authors:  Georgia H O'Leary; Dorothea D Jenkins; Patricia Coker-Bolt; Mark S George; Steve Kautz; Marom Bikson; Bernadette T Gillick; Bashar W Badran
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  2021-02-23       Impact factor: 2.624

8.  Anodal tDCS augments and preserves working memory beyond time-on-task deficits.

Authors:  Rohith Karthikeyan; Meredith R Smoot; Ranjana K Mehta
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-09-27       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.