Surface and mechanical analysis of explanted Poly Implant Prosthèse silicone breast implants.

BACKGROUND: The recent events surrounding Poly Implant Prosthèse (PIP) breast implants have renewed the debate about the safety profile of silicone implants. The intentional use of industrial-grade instead of certified medical-grade silicone is thought to be responsible for reportedly higher frequencies of implant rupture in vivo. The differences in mechanical and viscoelastic properties between PIP and medical-grade silicone implant shells were investigated. Surface characterization of shells and gels was carried out to determine structural changes occurring after implantation.
METHODS: Breast implants were obtained from women at the Royal Free Hospital (London, UK). PIP implants were compared with medical-grade control silicone implants. Tensile strength, tear resistance and elongation at break were assessed using a tensile tester. Surfaces were analysed using attenuated total reflectance-Fourier transform infrared (ATR-FTIR) spectroscopy. Spearman correlation analyses and Kruskal-Wallis one-way statistical tests were performed for mechanical data.
RESULTS: There were 18 PIP and four medical-grade silicone implants. PIP silicone shells had significantly weaker mechanical strength than control shells (P < 0·009). There were negative correlations between mechanical properties of PIP shells and implantation times, indicative of deterioration of PIP shells over time in vivo (r(s) = -0·75, P = 0·009 for tensile strength; r(s) = -0·76, P = 0·001 for maximal strain). Comparison of ATR-FTIR spectra of PIP and control silicones demonstrated changes in material characteristics during the period of implantation suggestive of time-dependent bond breakage and degradation of the material.
CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated an increased weakness of PIP shells with time and therefore supports the argument for prophylactic removal of PIP breast implants.