Literature DB >> 23474021

Comparative regulatory approaches for groups of new plant breeding techniques.

Maria Lusser1, Howard V Davies.   

Abstract

This manuscript provides insights into ongoing debates on the regulatory issues surrounding groups of biotechnology-driven 'New Plant Breeding Techniques' (NPBTs). It presents the outcomes of preliminary discussions and in some cases the initial decisions taken by regulators in the following countries: Argentina, Australia, Canada, EU, Japan, South Africa and USA. In the light of these discussions we suggest in this manuscript a structured approach to make the evaluation more consistent and efficient. The issue appears to be complex as these groups of new technologies vary widely in both the technologies deployed and their impact on heritable changes in the plant genome. An added complication is that the legislation, definitions and regulatory approaches for biotechnology-derived crops differ significantly between these countries. There are therefore concerns that this situation will lead to non-harmonised regulatory approaches and asynchronous development and marketing of such crops resulting in trade disruptions.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23474021     DOI: 10.1016/j.nbt.2013.02.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Biotechnol        ISSN: 1871-6784            Impact factor:   5.079


  24 in total

1.  Regulatory framework for gene editing and other new breeding techniques (NBTs) in Argentina.

Authors:  Agustina I Whelan; Martin A Lema
Journal:  GM Crops Food       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 3.074

2.  The meaningless pseudo-category of "GMOs": The trouble with the "new techniques" for genetically modifying crops demonstrates the illogical process-based definition of GMOs in EU regulation.

Authors:  Giovanni Tagliabue
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2015-11-11       Impact factor: 8.807

3.  Genetically engineered crops that fly under the US regulatory radar.

Authors:  Alex Camacho; Allen Van Deynze; Cecilia Chi-Ham; Alan B Bennett
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 54.908

4.  Clarifying the regulation of genome editing in Australia: situation for genetically modified organisms.

Authors:  Peter Thygesen
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 2.788

Review 5.  New GMO regulations for old: Determining a new future for EU crop biotechnology.

Authors:  John Davison; Klaus Ammann
Journal:  GM Crops Food       Date:  2017-01-02       Impact factor: 3.074

6.  A research program for the socioeconomic impacts of gene editing regulation.

Authors:  Agustina I Whelan; Martin A Lema
Journal:  GM Crops Food       Date:  2017-01-12       Impact factor: 3.074

Review 7.  Virus-Induced Flowering: An Application of Reproductive Biology to Benefit Plant Research and Breeding.

Authors:  Roisin C McGarry; Amy L Klocko; Mingxiong Pang; Steven H Strauss; Brian G Ayre
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2016-11-17       Impact factor: 8.340

8.  A new window of opportunity to reject process-based biotechnology regulation.

Authors:  Gary E Marchant; Yvonne A Stevens
Journal:  GM Crops Food       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 3.074

Review 9.  Novel GM animal technologies and their governance.

Authors:  Ann Bruce; David Castle; Corrina Gibbs; Joyce Tait; C Bruce A Whitelaw
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2013-06-19       Impact factor: 2.788

Review 10.  Ethylene resistance in flowering ornamental plants - improvements and future perspectives.

Authors:  Andreas Olsen; Henrik Lütken; Josefine Nymark Hegelund; Renate Müller
Journal:  Hortic Res       Date:  2015-08-26       Impact factor: 6.793

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.