Literature DB >> 23473936

Targeted transcranial direct current stimulation for rehabilitation after stroke.

Jacek P Dmochowski1, Abhishek Datta2, Yu Huang3, Jessica D Richardson4, Marom Bikson3, Julius Fridriksson4, Lucas C Parra5.   

Abstract

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is being investigated as an adjunctive technique to behavioral rehabilitation treatment after stroke. The conventional "dosage", consisting of a large (25 cm(2)) anode over the target with the cathode over the contralateral hemisphere, has been previously shown to yield broadly distributed electric fields whose intensities at the target region are less than maximal. Here, we report the results of a systematic targeting procedure with small "high-definition" electrodes that was used in preparation for a pilot study on 8 stroke patients with chronic aphasia. We employ functional and anatomical magnetic resonance imagery (fMRI/MRI) to define a target and optimize (with respect to the electric field magnitude at the target) the electrode configuration, respectively, and demonstrate that electric field strengths in targeted cortex can be substantially increased (63%) over the conventional approach. The optimal montage exhibits significant variation across subjects as well as when perturbing the target location within a subject. However, for each displacement of the target co-ordinates, the algorithm is able to determine a montage which delivers a consistent amount of current to that location. These results demonstrate that MRI-based models of current flow yield maximal stimulation of target structures, and as such, may aid in reliably assessing the efficacy of tDCS in neuro-rehabilitation.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23473936      PMCID: PMC4120279          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.02.049

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  28 in total

1.  Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by weak transcranial direct current stimulation.

Authors:  M A Nitsche; W Paulus
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2000-09-15       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Influence of transcortical d-c currents on cortical neuronal activity.

Authors:  O D CREUTZFELDT; G H FROMM; H KAPP
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  1962-06       Impact factor: 5.330

3.  Spike timing amplifies the effect of electric fields on neurons: implications for endogenous field effects.

Authors:  Thomas Radman; Yuzhuo Su; Je Hi An; Lucas C Parra; Marom Bikson
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-03-14       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Sensitivity of coherent oscillations in rat hippocampus to AC electric fields.

Authors:  Jacqueline K Deans; Andrew D Powell; John G R Jefferys
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2007-06-28       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Direct current stimulation promotes BDNF-dependent synaptic plasticity: potential implications for motor learning.

Authors:  Brita Fritsch; Janine Reis; Keri Martinowich; Heidi M Schambra; Yuanyuan Ji; Leonardo G Cohen; Bai Lu
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2010-04-29       Impact factor: 17.173

6.  Effects of non-invasive cortical stimulation on skilled motor function in chronic stroke.

Authors:  Friedhelm Hummel; Pablo Celnik; Pascal Giraux; Agnes Floel; Wan-Hsun Wu; Christian Gerloff; Leonardo G Cohen
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2005-01-05       Impact factor: 13.501

7.  Feasibility of using high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS) to enhance treatment outcomes in persons with aphasia.

Authors:  Jessica Richardson; Abhishek Datta; Jacek Dmochowski; Lucas C Parra; Julius Fridriksson
Journal:  NeuroRehabilitation       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.138

8.  The point spread function of the human head and its implications for transcranial current stimulation.

Authors:  Jacek P Dmochowski; Marom Bikson; Lucas C Parra
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2012-09-21       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 9.  Transcranial direct current stimulation in stroke recovery.

Authors:  Gottfried Schlaug; Vijay Renga; Dinesh Nair
Journal:  Arch Neurol       Date:  2008-12

Review 10.  Transcranial direct current stimulation: a noninvasive tool to facilitate stroke recovery.

Authors:  Gottfried Schlaug; Vijay Renga
Journal:  Expert Rev Med Devices       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 3.166

View more
  41 in total

Review 1.  Low intensity transcranial electric stimulation: Safety, ethical, legal regulatory and application guidelines.

Authors:  A Antal; I Alekseichuk; M Bikson; J Brockmöller; A R Brunoni; R Chen; L G Cohen; G Dowthwaite; J Ellrich; A Flöel; F Fregni; M S George; R Hamilton; J Haueisen; C S Herrmann; F C Hummel; J P Lefaucheur; D Liebetanz; C K Loo; C D McCaig; C Miniussi; P C Miranda; V Moliadze; M A Nitsche; R Nowak; F Padberg; A Pascual-Leone; W Poppendieck; A Priori; S Rossi; P M Rossini; J Rothwell; M A Rueger; G Ruffini; K Schellhorn; H R Siebner; Y Ugawa; A Wexler; U Ziemann; M Hallett; W Paulus
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-06-19       Impact factor: 3.708

Review 2.  Transcranial electrical stimulation nomenclature.

Authors:  Marom Bikson; Zeinab Esmaeilpour; Devin Adair; Greg Kronberg; William J Tyler; Andrea Antal; Abhishek Datta; Bernhard A Sabel; Michael A Nitsche; Colleen Loo; Dylan Edwards; Hamed Ekhtiari; Helena Knotkova; Adam J Woods; Benjamin M Hampstead; Bashar W Badran; Angel V Peterchev
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2019-07-17       Impact factor: 8.955

3.  Treatment of Primary Progressive Aphasia.

Authors:  Donna C Tippett; Argye E Hillis; Kyrana Tsapkini
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Neurol       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 3.598

4.  High-definition transcranial direct current stimulation of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex for tinnitus modulation: a preliminary trial.

Authors:  Giriraj Singh Shekhawat; Sven Vanneste
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2017-11-10       Impact factor: 3.575

Review 5.  Classification of methods in transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) and evolving strategy from historical approaches to contemporary innovations.

Authors:  Berkan Guleyupoglu; Pedro Schestatsky; Dylan Edwards; Felipe Fregni; Marom Bikson
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 2.390

6.  Cerebellar tDCS as a novel treatment for aphasia? Evidence from behavioral and resting-state functional connectivity data in healthy adults.

Authors:  Peter E Turkeltaub; Mary K Swears; Anila M D'Mello; Catherine J Stoodley
Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci       Date:  2016-05-24       Impact factor: 2.406

7.  Neuroplasticity in post-stroke aphasia: A systematic review and meta-analysis of functional imaging studies of reorganization of language processing.

Authors:  Stephen M Wilson; Sarah M Schneck
Journal:  Neurobiol Lang (Camb)       Date:  2020-12-01

Review 8.  Animal models of transcranial direct current stimulation: Methods and mechanisms.

Authors:  Mark P Jackson; Asif Rahman; Belen Lafon; Gregory Kronberg; Doris Ling; Lucas C Parra; Marom Bikson
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-09-10       Impact factor: 3.708

9.  Automated MRI segmentation for individualized modeling of current flow in the human head.

Authors:  Yu Huang; Jacek P Dmochowski; Yuzhuo Su; Abhishek Datta; Christopher Rorden; Lucas C Parra
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2013-10-08       Impact factor: 5.379

Review 10.  A technical guide to tDCS, and related non-invasive brain stimulation tools.

Authors:  A J Woods; A Antal; M Bikson; P S Boggio; A R Brunoni; P Celnik; L G Cohen; F Fregni; C S Herrmann; E S Kappenman; H Knotkova; D Liebetanz; C Miniussi; P C Miranda; W Paulus; A Priori; D Reato; C Stagg; N Wenderoth; M A Nitsche
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-11-22       Impact factor: 3.708

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.