Literature DB >> 23472225

Draft Genome Sequence of the Wolbachia Endosymbiont of Drosophila suzukii.

Stefanos Siozios1, Alessandro Cestaro, Rupinder Kaur, Ilaria Pertot, Omar Rota-Stabelli, Gianfranco Anfora.   

Abstract

Wolbachia is one of the most successful and abundant symbiotic bacteria in nature, infecting more than 40% of the terrestrial arthropod species. Here we report the draft genome sequence of a novel Wolbachia strain named "wSuzi" that was retrieved from the genome sequencing of its host, the invasive pest Drosophila suzukii.

Entities:  

Year:  2013        PMID: 23472225      PMCID: PMC3587926          DOI: 10.1128/genomeA.00032-13

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genome Announc


GENOME ANNOUNCEMENT

Drosophila suzukii (Matsumura) (Diptera Drosophilidae) is an invasive and destructive crop pest native to Southeast Asia that recently invaded Western countries, threatening both European and American fruit production (1, 2). The exploitation of symbiotic microorganisms for insect pest control has received considerable interest over the last few years (3). Owing to a pandemic distribution and unique ability to manipulate host reproduction, Wolbachia symbiotic bacteria are considered to be great candidates for their biocontrol potential (4, 5). Advances in genomics provide new opportunities for improving our understanding of Wolbachia biology. As a serendipitous byproduct of D. suzukii genome sequencing (L. Ometto, A. Cestaro, S. Ramasamy, A. Grassi, S. Revadi, S. Siozios, M. Moretto, P. Fontana, C. Varotto, D. Pisani, T. Dekker, N. Wrobel, R. Viola, I. Pertot, D. Cavalieri, M. Blaxter, G. Anfora, and O. Rota-Stabelli, submitted for publication) the genome of its Wolbachia endosymbiont (“wSuzi”) was sequenced. By using the genome sequences of the wMel, wRi, wAna, wWil, and wSim Wolbachia strains as probes, we searched the raw sequences from D. suzukii sequencing and retrieved 1,082,694 Wolbachia matched reads (IlluminaHiseqII 100-bp reads). Among the 1,082,694 reads, 1,054,920 were paired, corresponding to two pair-end libraries with average insert sizes of 180 and 300 bp, while the remaining 27,774 reads were singletons. De novo assembly was performed using the packages MIRA (6) under default parameters and Velvet (7) using a kmer of 65; we further assisted assembly using the AMOS_cmp assembler (8) and the genome of the wRi strain infecting D. simulans as a reference (9). To identify ambiguously assembled contigs, the three assemblies were simultaneously mapped against the wRi genome using the Geneious mapping algorithm (10). The final assembly yielded approximately 1.35 Mbp in 110 contigs, with a maximum length of 89,713 bp, a mean of 12,272 bp, and an average depth of coverage of 60×. The genome has an average G+C content of 35.2% and contains approximately 1,262 open reading frames (ORFs), as predicted by Glimmer v3.02 (11), and one copy of the 16S, 23S, and 5S rRNA genes and 34 tRNA genes, as predicted by tRNAscan_SE (12). The draft genome of wSuzi displays great similarity with the wRi genome and covers approximately 98% of its length. Indeed, all of the markers commonly used to discriminate between different Wolbachia strains (13–17) revealed no substitutions between wRi and wSuzi. The only exception was dnaA, with only one nonsynonymous substitution separating the two strains. However, we were able to identify and validate with PCR several structural variations, such as indels and genomic rearrangements. The most relevant deletion is of approximately 21 kbp and is upstream of the WORiB prophage; this region includes mainly ankyrin repeat genes. There are also two large-scale rearrangements distinguishing the two genomes. The largest one corresponds to an inversion of a segment at least 80 kbp long. Finally, we found that most of the polymorphism between the two strains involves transposable elements: we could detect approximately 34 deletions of insertion sequence (IS) elements in wSuzi compared to the wRi genome. Our data indicate that D. suzukii carries a novel strain of Wolbachia whose close relationship with wRi hampers its discrimination with the classical MLST approach (16, 17). Further genetic and comparative studies will provide new insights into the biology of this Drosophila-Wolbachia association.

Nucleotide sequence accession numbers.

The genome sequence of the Wolbachia endosymbiont of D. suzukii has been deposited at EMBL under accession numbers CAOU02000001 to CAOU02000110. The sequences are also available from the website of Fondazione Edmund Mach (http://genomics.research.iasma.it/ds/twiki/bin/view/Main/ScaricaGenomi).
  15 in total

1.  Identifying bacterial genes and endosymbiont DNA with Glimmer.

Authors:  Arthur L Delcher; Kirsten A Bratke; Edwin C Powers; Steven L Salzberg
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2007-01-19       Impact factor: 6.937

2.  Velvet: algorithms for de novo short read assembly using de Bruijn graphs.

Authors:  Daniel R Zerbino; Ewan Birney
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2008-03-18       Impact factor: 9.043

Review 3.  Wolbachia-based technologies for insect pest population control.

Authors:  Kostas Bourtzis
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.622

4.  Evolution and phylogeny of Wolbachia: reproductive parasites of arthropods.

Authors:  J H Werren; W Zhang; L R Guo
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1995-07-22       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  tRNAscan-SE: a program for improved detection of transfer RNA genes in genomic sequence.

Authors:  T M Lowe; S R Eddy
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1997-03-01       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  Drosophila suzukii.

Authors:  Omar Rota-Stabelli; Mark Blaxter; Gianfranco Anfora
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2013-01-07       Impact factor: 10.834

7.  Phylogeny and PCR-based classification of Wolbachia strains using wsp gene sequences.

Authors:  W Zhou; F Rousset; S O'Neil
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1998-03-22       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Multilocus sequence typing system for the endosymbiont Wolbachia pipientis.

Authors:  Laura Baldo; Julie C Dunning Hotopp; Keith A Jolley; Seth R Bordenstein; Sarah A Biber; Rhitoban Ray Choudhury; Cheryl Hayashi; Martin C J Maiden; Hervè Tettelin; John H Werren
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2006-08-25       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  16S rRNA phylogenetic analysis of the bacterial endosymbionts associated with cytoplasmic incompatibility in insects.

Authors:  S L O'Neill; R Giordano; A M Colbert; T L Karr; H M Robertson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1992-04-01       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Wolbachia-induced cytoplasmic incompatibility as a means for insect pest population control.

Authors:  Sofia Zabalou; Markus Riegler; Marianna Theodorakopoulou; Christian Stauffer; Charalambos Savakis; Kostas Bourtzis
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-10-06       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  21 in total

1.  Wolbachia do not live by reproductive manipulation alone: infection polymorphism in Drosophila suzukii and D. subpulchrella.

Authors:  Christopher A Hamm; David J Begun; Alexandre Vo; Chris C R Smith; Perot Saelao; Amanda O Shaver; John Jaenike; Michael Turelli
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2014-09-18       Impact factor: 6.185

2.  Wolbachia Acquisition by Drosophila yakuba-Clade Hosts and Transfer of Incompatibility Loci Between Distantly Related Wolbachia.

Authors:  Brandon S Cooper; Dan Vanderpool; William R Conner; Daniel R Matute; Michael Turelli
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2019-06-21       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Rapid Global Spread of wRi-like Wolbachia across Multiple Drosophila.

Authors:  Michael Turelli; Brandon S Cooper; Kelly M Richardson; Paul S Ginsberg; Brooke Peckenpaugh; Chenling X Antelope; Kevin J Kim; Michael R May; Antoine Abrieux; Derek A Wilson; Michael J Bronski; Brian R Moore; Jian-Jun Gao; Michael B Eisen; Joanna C Chiu; William R Conner; Ary A Hoffmann
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2018-03-08       Impact factor: 10.834

4.  Loss of cytoplasmic incompatibility and minimal fecundity effects explain relatively low Wolbachia frequencies in Drosophila mauritiana.

Authors:  Megan K Meany; William R Conner; Sophia V Richter; Jessica A Bailey; Michael Turelli; Brandon S Cooper
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2019-04-29       Impact factor: 3.694

5.  The coevolutionary period of Wolbachia pipientis infecting Drosophila ananassae and its impact on the evolution of the host germline stem cell regulating genes.

Authors:  Jae Young Choi; Charles F Aquadro
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2014-06-28       Impact factor: 16.240

6.  Pervasive effects of Wolbachia on host activity.

Authors:  Michael T J Hague; H Arthur Woods; Brandon S Cooper
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 3.703

7.  Wolbachia infection and Lepidoptera of conservation concern.

Authors:  C A Hamm; C A Handley; A Pike; M L Forister; J A Fordyce; C C Nice
Journal:  J Insect Sci       Date:  2014-01-14       Impact factor: 1.857

8.  Linking genomics and ecology to investigate the complex evolution of an invasive Drosophila pest.

Authors:  Lino Ometto; Alessandro Cestaro; Sukanya Ramasamy; Alberto Grassi; Santosh Revadi; Stefanos Siozios; Marco Moretto; Paolo Fontana; Claudio Varotto; Davide Pisani; Teun Dekker; Nicola Wrobel; Roberto Viola; Ilaria Pertot; Duccio Cavalieri; Mark Blaxter; Gianfranco Anfora; Omar Rota-Stabelli
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 3.416

9.  Population Genomics of Infectious and Integrated Wolbachia pipientis Genomes in Drosophila ananassae.

Authors:  Jae Young Choi; Jaclyn E Bubnell; Charles F Aquadro
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2015-08-08       Impact factor: 3.416

10.  More than fishing in the dark: PCR of a dispersed sequence produces simple but ultrasensitive Wolbachia detection.

Authors:  Daniela I Schneider; Lisa Klasson; Anders E Lind; Wolfgang J Miller
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2014-05-12       Impact factor: 3.605

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.