Literature DB >> 25156506

Wolbachia do not live by reproductive manipulation alone: infection polymorphism in Drosophila suzukii and D. subpulchrella.

Christopher A Hamm1, David J Begun, Alexandre Vo, Chris C R Smith, Perot Saelao, Amanda O Shaver, John Jaenike, Michael Turelli.   

Abstract

Drosophila suzukii recently invaded North America and Europe. Populations in Hawaii, California, New York and Nova Scotia are polymorphic for Wolbachia, typically with <20% infection frequency. The Wolbachia in D. suzukii, denoted wSuz, is closely related to wRi, the variant prevalent in continental populations of D. simulans. wSuz is also nearly identical to Wolbachia found in D. subpulchrella, plausibly D. suzukii's sister species. This suggests vertical Wolbachia transmission through cladogenesis ('cladogenic transmission'). The widespread occurrence of 7-20% infection frequencies indicates a stable polymorphism. wSuz is imperfectly maternally transmitted, with wild infected females producing on average 5-10% uninfected progeny. As expected from its low frequency, wSuz produces no cytoplasmic incompatibility (CI), that is, no increased embryo mortality when infected males mate with uninfected females, and no appreciable sex-ratio distortion. The persistence of wSuz despite imperfect maternal transmission suggests positive fitness effects. Assuming a balance between selection and imperfect transmission, we expect a fitness advantage on the order of 20%. Unexpectedly, Wolbachia-infected females produce fewer progeny than do uninfected females. We do not yet understand the maintenance of wSuz in D. suzukii. The absence of detectable CI in D. suzukii and D. subpulchrella makes it unlikely that CI-based mechanisms could be used to control this species without transinfection using novel Wolbachia. Contrary to their reputation as horizontally transmitted reproductive parasites, many Wolbachia infections are acquired through introgression or cladogenesis and many cause no appreciable reproductive manipulation. Such infections, likely to be mutualistic, may be central to understanding the pervasiveness of Wolbachia among arthropods.
© 2014 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  endosymbiont; fecundity; mutualism; reproductive manipulation; transmission

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25156506      PMCID: PMC4180775          DOI: 10.1111/mec.12901

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Ecol        ISSN: 0962-1083            Impact factor:   6.185


  94 in total

1.  Evolutionary novelties in islands: Drosophila santomea, a new melanogaster sister species from São Tomé.

Authors:  D Lachaise; M Harry; M Solignac; F Lemeunier; V Bénassi; M L Cariou
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2000-08-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Bidirectional incompatibility between conspecific populations of Drosophila simulans.

Authors:  S L O'Neill; T L Karr
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1990-11-08       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  A historic account of the invasion of Drosophila suzukii (Matsumura) (Diptera: Drosophilidae) in the continental United States, with remarks on their identification.

Authors:  Martin Hauser
Journal:  Pest Manag Sci       Date:  2011-09-06       Impact factor: 4.845

4.  Maintenance of a male-killing Wolbachia in Drosophila innubila by male-killing dependent and male-killing independent mechanisms.

Authors:  Robert L Unckless; John Jaenike
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2011-11-11       Impact factor: 3.694

5.  Eradication of Culex pipiens fatigans through cytoplasmic incompatibility.

Authors:  H Laven
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1967-10-28       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Wolbachia-mediated persistence of mtDNA from a potentially extinct species.

Authors:  Kelly A Dyer; Crista Burke; John Jaenike
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2011-05-20       Impact factor: 6.185

7.  Infectious speciation revisited: impact of symbiont-depletion on female fitness and mating behavior of Drosophila paulistorum.

Authors:  Wolfgang J Miller; Lee Ehrman; Daniela Schneider
Journal:  PLoS Pathog       Date:  2010-12-02       Impact factor: 6.823

8.  Natural Wolbachia infections in the Drosophila yakuba species complex do not induce cytoplasmic incompatibility but fully rescue the wRi modification.

Authors:  Sofia Zabalou; Sylvain Charlat; Androniki Nirgianaki; Daniel Lachaise; Hervé Merçot; Kostas Bourtzis
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Cytoplasmic incompatibility in Drosophila simulans: dynamics and parameter estimates from natural populations.

Authors:  M Turelli; A A Hoffmann
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Wolbachia variants induce differential protection to viruses in Drosophila melanogaster: a phenotypic and phylogenomic analysis.

Authors:  Ewa Chrostek; Marta S P Marialva; Sara S Esteves; Lucy A Weinert; Julien Martinez; Francis M Jiggins; Luis Teixeira
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2013-12-12       Impact factor: 5.917

View more
  44 in total

1.  Wolbachia Acquisition by Drosophila yakuba-Clade Hosts and Transfer of Incompatibility Loci Between Distantly Related Wolbachia.

Authors:  Brandon S Cooper; Dan Vanderpool; William R Conner; Daniel R Matute; Michael Turelli
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2019-06-21       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Wolbachia spreading dynamics in mosquitoes with imperfect maternal transmission.

Authors:  Bo Zheng; Moxun Tang; Jianshe Yu; Junxiong Qiu
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 2.259

3.  Geographic and Temporal Variation of Distinct Intracellular Endosymbiont Strains of Wolbachia sp. in the Grasshopper Chorthippus parallelus: a Frequency-Dependent Mechanism?

Authors:  Paloma Martínez-Rodríguez; Emilio Rolán-Alvarez; M Del Mar Pérez-Ruiz; Francisca Arroyo-Yebras; Carla Carpena-Catoira; Antonio Carvajal-Rodríguez; José L Bella
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2019-02-14       Impact factor: 4.552

Review 4.  The Jekyll and Hyde Symbiont: Could Wolbachia Be a Nutritional Mutualist?

Authors:  Irene L G Newton; Danny W Rice
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2020-01-29       Impact factor: 3.490

5.  Rapid Global Spread of wRi-like Wolbachia across Multiple Drosophila.

Authors:  Michael Turelli; Brandon S Cooper; Kelly M Richardson; Paul S Ginsberg; Brooke Peckenpaugh; Chenling X Antelope; Kevin J Kim; Michael R May; Antoine Abrieux; Derek A Wilson; Michael J Bronski; Brian R Moore; Jian-Jun Gao; Michael B Eisen; Joanna C Chiu; William R Conner; Ary A Hoffmann
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2018-03-08       Impact factor: 10.834

6.  Wolbachia in the Drosophila yakuba Complex: Pervasive Frequency Variation and Weak Cytoplasmic Incompatibility, but No Apparent Effect on Reproductive Isolation.

Authors:  Brandon S Cooper; Paul S Ginsberg; Michael Turelli; Daniel R Matute
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2016-11-07       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Endosymbiont diversity in natural populations of Tetranychus mites is rapidly lost under laboratory conditions.

Authors:  Fabrice Vavre; Sara Magalhães; Flore Zélé; Inês Santos; Margarida Matos; Mylène Weill
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2020-02-11       Impact factor: 3.821

8.  Tropical Drosophila pandora carry Wolbachia infections causing cytoplasmic incompatibility or male killing.

Authors:  Kelly M Richardson; Michele Schiffer; Philippa C Griffin; Siu F Lee; Ary A Hoffmann
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2016-07-01       Impact factor: 3.694

9.  Environmental and Genetic Contributions to Imperfect wMel-Like Wolbachia Transmission and Frequency Variation.

Authors:  Michael T J Hague; Heidi Mavengere; Daniel R Matute; Brandon S Cooper
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2020-06-16       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Persistence of a Wolbachia infection frequency cline in Drosophila melanogaster and the possible role of reproductive dormancy.

Authors:  Peter Kriesner; William R Conner; Andrew R Weeks; Michael Turelli; Ary A Hoffmann
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2016-05-05       Impact factor: 3.694

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.