Literature DB >> 24974378

The coevolutionary period of Wolbachia pipientis infecting Drosophila ananassae and its impact on the evolution of the host germline stem cell regulating genes.

Jae Young Choi1, Charles F Aquadro2.   

Abstract

The endosymbiotic bacteria Wolbachia pipientis is known to infect a wide range of arthropod species yet less is known about the coevolutionary history it has with its hosts. Evidence of highly identical W. pipientis strains in evolutionary divergent hosts suggests horizontal transfer between hosts. For example, Drosophila ananassae is infected with a W. pipientis strain that is nearly identical in sequence to a strain that infects both D. simulans and D. suzukii, suggesting recent horizontal transfer among these three species. However, it is unknown whether the W. pipientis strain had recently invaded all three species or a more complex infectious dynamic underlies the horizontal transfers. Here, we have examined the coevolutionary history of D. ananassae and its resident W. pipientis to infer its period of infection. Phylogenetic analysis of D. ananassae mitochondrial DNA and W. pipientis DNA sequence diversity revealed the current W. pipientis infection is not recent. In addition, we examined the population genetics and molecular evolution of several germline stem cell (GSC) regulating genes of D. ananassae. These studies reveal significant evidence of recent and long-term positive selection at stonewall in D. ananassae, whereas pumillio showed patterns of variation consistent with only recent positive selection. Previous studies had found evidence for adaptive evolution of two key germline differentiation genes, bag of marbles (bam) and benign gonial cell neoplasm (bgcn), in D. melanogaster and D. simulans and proposed that the adaptive evolution at these two genes was driven by arms race between the host GSC and W. pipientis. However, we did not find any statistical departures from a neutral model of evolution for bam and bgcn in D. ananassae despite our new evidence that this species has been infected with W. pipientis for a period longer than the most recent infection in D. melanogaster. In the end, analyzing the GSC regulating genes individually showed two of the seven genes to have evidence of selection. However, combining the data set and fitting a specific population genetic model significant proportion of the nonsynonymous sites across the GSC regulating genes were driven to fixation by positive selection. Clearly the GSC system is under rapid evolution and potentially multiple drivers are causing the rapid evolution.
© The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Drosophila ananassae; Wolbachia pipientis; germline stem cell; positive selection

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24974378      PMCID: PMC4137719          DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msu204

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Biol Evol        ISSN: 0737-4038            Impact factor:   16.240


  108 in total

1.  RAxML-VI-HPC: maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models.

Authors:  Alexandros Stamatakis
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2006-08-23       Impact factor: 6.937

2.  A historic account of the invasion of Drosophila suzukii (Matsumura) (Diptera: Drosophilidae) in the continental United States, with remarks on their identification.

Authors:  Martin Hauser
Journal:  Pest Manag Sci       Date:  2011-09-06       Impact factor: 4.845

3.  Statistical method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism.

Authors:  F Tajima
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Statistical tests of neutrality of mutations.

Authors:  Y X Fu; W H Li
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Wolbachia-mediated persistence of mtDNA from a potentially extinct species.

Authors:  Kelly A Dyer; Crista Burke; John Jaenike
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2011-05-20       Impact factor: 6.185

Review 6.  Wolbachia infections in Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans: polymorphism and levels of cytoplasmic incompatibility.

Authors:  Hervé Merçot; Sylvain Charlat
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 1.082

7.  A host parasite interaction rescues Drosophila oogenesis defects.

Authors:  Diana J Starr; Thomas W Cline
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-07-04       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Cytoplasmic incompatibility in Drosophila simulans: dynamics and parameter estimates from natural populations.

Authors:  M Turelli; A A Hoffmann
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Codon usage in twelve species of Drosophila.

Authors:  Saverio Vicario; Etsuko N Moriyama; Jeffrey R Powell
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2007-11-15       Impact factor: 3.260

10.  Wolbachia variants induce differential protection to viruses in Drosophila melanogaster: a phenotypic and phylogenomic analysis.

Authors:  Ewa Chrostek; Marta S P Marialva; Sara S Esteves; Lucy A Weinert; Julien Martinez; Francis M Jiggins; Luis Teixeira
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2013-12-12       Impact factor: 5.917

View more
  17 in total

1.  The Drosophila bag of marbles Gene Interacts Genetically with Wolbachia and Shows Female-Specific Effects of Divergence.

Authors:  Heather A Flores; Jaclyn E Bubnell; Charles F Aquadro; Daniel A Barbash
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2015-08-20       Impact factor: 5.917

2.  Recent and Long-Term Selection Across Synonymous Sites in Drosophila ananassae.

Authors:  Jae Young Choi; Charles F Aquadro
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 2.395

3.  ketu mutant mice uncover an essential meiotic function for the ancient RNA helicase YTHDC2.

Authors:  Devanshi Jain; M Rhyan Puno; Cem Meydan; Nathalie Lailler; Christopher E Mason; Christopher D Lima; Kathryn V Anderson; Scott Keeney
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2018-01-23       Impact factor: 8.140

Review 4.  Status of research on Drosophila ananassae at global level.

Authors:  B N Singh; J P Yadav
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.166

5.  Low Endosymbiont Incidence in Drosophila Species Across Peninsula Thailand.

Authors:  Matsapume Detcharoen; Areeruk Nilsai
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2022-02-22       Impact factor: 4.552

6.  Rapid Divergence of Key Spermatogenesis Genes in nasuta-Subgroup of Drosophila.

Authors:  Rajanikanth Chowdanayaka; Ramachandra Nallur Basappa
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2021-11-22       Impact factor: 2.395

7.  Extreme divergence of Wolbachia tropism for the stem-cell-niche in the Drosophila testis.

Authors:  Michelle E Toomey; Horacio M Frydman
Journal:  PLoS Pathog       Date:  2014-12-18       Impact factor: 6.823

8.  Population Genomics of Infectious and Integrated Wolbachia pipientis Genomes in Drosophila ananassae.

Authors:  Jae Young Choi; Jaclyn E Bubnell; Charles F Aquadro
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2015-08-08       Impact factor: 3.416

9.  Extensive duplication of the Wolbachia DNA in chromosome four of Drosophila ananassae.

Authors:  Lisa Klasson; Nikhil Kumar; Robin Bromley; Karsten Sieber; Melissa Flowers; Sandra H Ott; Luke J Tallon; Siv G E Andersson; Julie C Dunning Hotopp
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2014-12-12       Impact factor: 3.969

10.  Molecular Evolution of Drosophila Germline Stem Cell and Neural Stem Cell Regulating Genes.

Authors:  Jae Young Choi; Charles F Aquadro
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2015-10-27       Impact factor: 3.416

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.