Literature DB >> 2347202

Visual performance in high myopia.

J W Collins1, L G Carney.   

Abstract

The visual performances of eight low myopic subjects (-2 D to -7 D) and eight high myopic subjects (greater than -7 D) with normal visual acuities were analyzed by contrast sensitivity testing with both spectacle and contact lens corrections to determine if any differences in function exist between those groups. Statistically significant (p = 0.0382) contrast sensitivity losses, particularly at the higher spatial frequencies, were found for the high myopic subjects when corrected with spectacles. However, with contact lens correction, no statistically significant overall difference between the two groups was evident (p = 0.5083). We believe that these results confirm for highly myopic subjects the lack of any consistently present loss of resolution. The differences with spectacle correction are attributable to the nature of the optical correction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2347202     DOI: 10.3109/02713689009044516

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Eye Res        ISSN: 0271-3683            Impact factor:   2.424


  14 in total

1.  Rapid and reliable assessment of the contrast sensitivity function on an iPad.

Authors:  Michael Dorr; Luis A Lesmes; Zhong-Lin Lu; Peter J Bex
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2013-11-05       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  Priming Facial Gender and Emotional Valence: The Influence of Spatial Frequency on Face Perception in ASD.

Authors:  Steven Vanmarcke; Johan Wagemans
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2017-04

3.  Spatial Frequency Priming of Scene Perception in Adolescents With and Without ASD.

Authors:  Steven Vanmarcke; Ilse Noens; Jean Steyaert; Johan Wagemans
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2017-07

4.  Curveball: A tool for rapid measurement of contrast sensitivity based on smooth eye movements.

Authors:  Scott W J Mooney; N Jeremy Hill; Melis S Tuzun; Nazia M Alam; Jason B Carmel; Glen T Prusky
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Laser in situ keratomileusis for treated myopic anisometropic amblyopia in children.

Authors:  Assad A Ghanem; Ashraf I Moad; Ehab H Nematallah; Ibrahim T El-Adawy; Ghada M Anwar
Journal:  Saudi J Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-01-12

6.  Electrophysiological study of myopia.

Authors:  Mona Abdel Kader
Journal:  Saudi J Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-08-16

7.  Accommodation and induced myopia in marmosets.

Authors:  David Troilo; Nicole Quinn; Kayla Baker
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2007-03-13       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Measuring contrast sensitivity.

Authors:  Denis G Pelli; Peter Bex
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2013-05-03       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Individual variations in human cone photoreceptor packing density: variations with refractive error.

Authors:  Toco Yuen Ping Chui; Hongxin Song; Stephen A Burns
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2008-06-14       Impact factor: 4.799

10.  Defective Temporal Window of the Foveal Visual Processing in High Myopia.

Authors:  Haiyan Zheng; Xiaoxiao Ying; Xianghang He; Jia Qu; Fang Hou
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 4.799

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.