Literature DB >> 23471853

Consumers on the Internet: ethical and legal aspects of commercialization of personalized nutrition.

Jennie Ahlgren1, Anders Nordgren, Maud Perrudin, Amber Ronteltap, Jean Savigny, Hans van Trijp, Karin Nordström, Ulf Görman.   

Abstract

Consumers often have a positive attitude to the option of receiving personalized nutrition advice based upon genetic testing, since the prospect of enhancing or maintaining one's health can be perceived as empowering. Current direct-to-consumer services over the Internet, however, suffer from a questionable level of truthfulness and consumer protection, in addition to an imbalance between far-reaching promises and contrasting disclaimers. Psychological and behavioral studies indicate that consumer acceptance of a new technology is primarily explained by the end user's rational and emotional interpretation as well as moral beliefs. Results from such studies indicate that personalized nutrition must create true value for the consumer. Also, the freedom to choose is crucial for consumer acceptance. From an ethical point of view, consumer protection is crucial, and caution must be exercised when putting nutrigenomic-based tests and advice services on the market. Current Internet offerings appear to reveal a need to further guaranty legal certainty by ensuring privacy, consumer protection and safety. Personalized nutrition services are on the borderline between nutrition and medicine. Current regulation of this area is incomplete and undergoing development. This situation entails the necessity for carefully assessing and developing existing rules that safeguard fundamental rights and data protection while taking into account the sensitivity of data, the risks posed by each step in their processing, and sufficient guarantees for consumers against potential misuse.

Year:  2013        PMID: 23471853      PMCID: PMC3689896          DOI: 10.1007/s12263-013-0331-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genes Nutr        ISSN: 1555-8932            Impact factor:   5.523


  7 in total

1.  Nutrigenomics, individualism and public health.

Authors:  Ruth Chadwick
Journal:  Proc Nutr Soc       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 6.297

2.  Neither as harmful as feared by critics nor as empowering as promised by providers: risk information offered direct to consumer by personal genomics companies.

Authors:  Anders Nordgren
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2012-04-05

Review 3.  Consumer acceptance of technology-based food innovations: lessons for the future of nutrigenomics.

Authors:  A Ronteltap; J C M van Trijp; R J Renes; L J Frewer
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2007-02-24       Impact factor: 3.868

4.  Attitudes toward genetic testing and personalised nutrition in a representative sample of European consumers.

Authors:  Barbara J Stewart-Knox; Brendan P Bunting; Sarah Gilpin; Heather J Parr; Silvia Pinhão; J J Strain; Maria D V de Almeida; Mike Gibney
Journal:  Br J Nutr       Date:  2008-09-08       Impact factor: 3.718

5.  Consumer acceptance of nutrigenomics-based personalised nutrition.

Authors:  A Ronteltap; J C M van Trijp; R J Renes
Journal:  Br J Nutr       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 3.718

6.  Nutrigenomics-based personalised nutritional advice: in search of a business model?

Authors:  Amber Ronteltap; Hans van Trijp; Aleksandra Berezowska; Jo Goossens
Journal:  Genes Nutr       Date:  2012-08-19       Impact factor: 5.523

7.  Do we know enough? A scientific and ethical analysis of the basis for genetic-based personalized nutrition.

Authors:  Ulf Görman; John C Mathers; Keith A Grimaldi; Jennie Ahlgren; Karin Nordström
Journal:  Genes Nutr       Date:  2013-03-08       Impact factor: 5.523

  7 in total
  8 in total

1.  "Are you a gastroenterologist or a philosopher?".

Authors:  Vincent Baty
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 10.864

2.  Editorial.

Authors:  U Görman
Journal:  Genes Nutr       Date:  2013-03-19       Impact factor: 5.523

3.  Values at stake: autonomy, responsibility, and trustworthiness in relation to genetic testing and personalized nutrition advice.

Authors:  Karin Nordström; Niklas Juth; Sofia Kjellström; Franck L B Meijboom; Ulf Görman
Journal:  Genes Nutr       Date:  2013-03-16       Impact factor: 5.523

Review 4.  Proposed guidelines to evaluate scientific validity and evidence for genotype-based dietary advice.

Authors:  Keith A Grimaldi; Ben van Ommen; Jose M Ordovas; Laurence D Parnell; John C Mathers; Igor Bendik; Lorraine Brennan; Carlos Celis-Morales; Elisa Cirillo; Hannelore Daniel; Brenda de Kok; Ahmed El-Sohemy; Susan J Fairweather-Tait; Rosalind Fallaize; Michael Fenech; Lynnette R Ferguson; Eileen R Gibney; Mike Gibney; Ingrid M F Gjelstad; Jim Kaput; Anette S Karlsen; Silvia Kolossa; Julie Lovegrove; Anna L Macready; Cyril F M Marsaux; J Alfredo Martinez; Fermin Milagro; Santiago Navas-Carretero; Helen M Roche; Wim H M Saris; Iwona Traczyk; Henk van Kranen; Lars Verschuren; Fabio Virgili; Peter Weber; Jildau Bouwman
Journal:  Genes Nutr       Date:  2017-12-15       Impact factor: 5.523

Review 5.  Tackling Atherosclerosis via Selected Nutrition.

Authors:  Anna Vesnina; Alexander Prosekov; Victor Atuchin; Varvara Minina; Anastasia Ponasenko
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-07-26       Impact factor: 6.208

Review 6.  Precision nutrition: Maintaining scientific integrity while realizing market potential.

Authors:  Silvia Berciano; Juliana Figueiredo; Tristin D Brisbois; Susan Alford; Katie Koecher; Sara Eckhouse; Roberto Ciati; Martin Kussmann; Jose M Ordovas; Katie Stebbins; Jeffrey B Blumberg
Journal:  Front Nutr       Date:  2022-09-02

Review 7.  Ethical issues in the development and implementation of nutrition-related public health policies and interventions: A scoping review.

Authors:  Thierry Hurlimann; Juan Pablo Peña-Rosas; Abha Saxena; Gerardo Zamora; Béatrice Godard
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-10-26       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Personalised nutrition and health.

Authors:  Jose M Ordovas; Lynnette R Ferguson; E Shyong Tai; John C Mathers
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2018-06-13
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.