Literature DB >> 18775102

Attitudes toward genetic testing and personalised nutrition in a representative sample of European consumers.

Barbara J Stewart-Knox1, Brendan P Bunting, Sarah Gilpin, Heather J Parr, Silvia Pinhão, J J Strain, Maria D V de Almeida, Mike Gibney.   

Abstract

Negative consumer opinion poses a potential barrier to the application of nutrigenomic intervention. The present study has aimed to determine attitudes toward genetic testing and personalised nutrition among the European public. An omnibus opinion survey of a representative sample aged 14-55+ years (n 5967) took place in France, Italy, Great Britain, Portugal, Poland and Germany during June 2005 as part of the Lipgene project. A majority of respondents (66 %) reported that they would be willing to undergo genetic testing and 27 % to follow a personalised diet. Individuals who indicated a willingness to have a genetic test for the personalising of their diets were more likely to report a history of high blood cholesterol levels, central obesity and/or high levels of stress than those who would have a test only for general interest. Those who indicated that they would not have a genetic test were more likely to be male and less likely to report having central obesity. Individuals with a history of high blood cholesterol were less likely than those who did not to worry if intervention foods contained GM ingredients. Individuals who were aware that they had health problems associated with the metabolic syndrome appeared particularly favourable toward nutrigenomic intervention. These findings are encouraging for the future application of personalised nutrition provided that policies are put in place to address public concern about how genetic information is used and held.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18775102     DOI: 10.1017/S0007114508055657

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Nutr        ISSN: 0007-1145            Impact factor:   3.718


  25 in total

1.  Profile of European adults interested in internet-based personalised nutrition: the Food4Me study.

Authors:  Katherine M Livingstone; Carlos Celis-Morales; Santiago Navas-Carretero; Rodrigo San-Cristobal; Clare B O'Donovan; Hannah Forster; Clara Woolhead; Cyril F M Marsaux; Anna L Macready; Rosalind Fallaize; Silvia Kolossa; Lydia Tsirigoti; Christina P Lambrinou; George Moschonis; Magdalena Godlewska; Agnieszka Surwiłło; Christian A Drevon; Yannis Manios; Iwona Traczyk; Eileen R Gibney; Lorraine Brennan; Marianne C Walsh; Julie A Lovegrove; J Alfredo Martinez; Wim H Saris; Hannelore Daniel; Mike Gibney; John C Mathers
Journal:  Eur J Nutr       Date:  2015-04-17       Impact factor: 5.614

2.  Nutrigenomics-based personalised nutritional advice: in search of a business model?

Authors:  Amber Ronteltap; Hans van Trijp; Aleksandra Berezowska; Jo Goossens
Journal:  Genes Nutr       Date:  2012-08-19       Impact factor: 5.523

3.  Consumers on the Internet: ethical and legal aspects of commercialization of personalized nutrition.

Authors:  Jennie Ahlgren; Anders Nordgren; Maud Perrudin; Amber Ronteltap; Jean Savigny; Hans van Trijp; Karin Nordström; Ulf Görman
Journal:  Genes Nutr       Date:  2013-03-08       Impact factor: 5.523

4.  Values at stake: autonomy, responsibility, and trustworthiness in relation to genetic testing and personalized nutrition advice.

Authors:  Karin Nordström; Niklas Juth; Sofia Kjellström; Franck L B Meijboom; Ulf Görman
Journal:  Genes Nutr       Date:  2013-03-16       Impact factor: 5.523

5.  Design and baseline characteristics of the Food4Me study: a web-based randomised controlled trial of personalised nutrition in seven European countries.

Authors:  Carlos Celis-Morales; Katherine M Livingstone; Cyril F M Marsaux; Hannah Forster; Clare B O'Donovan; Clara Woolhead; Anna L Macready; Rosalind Fallaize; Santiago Navas-Carretero; Rodrigo San-Cristobal; Silvia Kolossa; Kai Hartwig; Lydia Tsirigoti; Christina P Lambrinou; George Moschonis; Magdalena Godlewska; Agnieszka Surwiłło; Keith Grimaldi; Jildau Bouwman; E J Daly; Victor Akujobi; Rick O'Riordan; Jettie Hoonhout; Arjan Claassen; Ulrich Hoeller; Thomas E Gundersen; Siv E Kaland; John N S Matthews; Yannis Manios; Iwona Traczyk; Christian A Drevon; Eileen R Gibney; Lorraine Brennan; Marianne C Walsh; Julie A Lovegrove; J Alfredo Martinez; Wim H M Saris; Hannelore Daniel; Mike Gibney; John C Mathers
Journal:  Genes Nutr       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 5.523

6.  Parent and public interest in whole-genome sequencing.

Authors:  Daniel S Dodson; Aaron J Goldenberg; Matthew M Davis; Dianne C Singer; Beth A Tarini
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2015-03-06       Impact factor: 2.000

7.  Highlights of the 2012 Research Workshop: Using nutrigenomics and metabolomics in clinical nutrition research.

Authors:  Steven H Zeisel; Robert A Waterland; José M Ordovás; Deborah M Muoio; Wei Jia; Anthony Fodor
Journal:  JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr       Date:  2012-10-05       Impact factor: 4.016

8.  A randomized trial of genetic information for personalized nutrition.

Authors:  Daiva E Nielsen; Ahmed El-Sohemy
Journal:  Genes Nutr       Date:  2012-03-11       Impact factor: 5.523

9.  A Novel Personalized Systems Nutrition Program Improves Dietary Patterns, Lifestyle Behaviors and Health-Related Outcomes: Results from the Habit Study.

Authors:  Iris M de Hoogh; Barbara L Winters; Kristin M Nieman; Sabina Bijlsma; Tanja Krone; Tim J van den Broek; Barbara D Anderson; Martien P M Caspers; Joshua C Anthony; Suzan Wopereis
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2021-05-22       Impact factor: 5.717

Review 10.  Nutrigenetics and metabolic disease: current status and implications for personalised nutrition.

Authors:  Catherine M Phillips
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2013-01-10       Impact factor: 5.717

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.