Literature DB >> 12176788

Lung cancer in women: age, smoking, histology, performance status, stage, initial treatment and survival. Population-based study of 20 561 cases.

E Radzikowska1, P Głaz, K Roszkowski.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The community-based cancer registry was set up and results were analysed to assess differences in clinicopathological parameters between women and men. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The Pulmonary Outpatient Departments supplied data on 20 561 lung cancer patients diagnosed in Poland from 1995 to 1998. Data regarding demographics, smoking, histology, treatment and survival were obtained.
RESULTS: There were 2875 women and 17 686 men with lung cancer. Women were younger than men (60.02 versus 62.18 years; P <0.001). Age <50 years was more frequent in women than in men (23.3% versus 12%; P <0.001). Women with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) and adenocarcinoma were significantly younger than women with squamous cancer (58.2 and 58.2 versus 61 years; P = 0.05). Also, men with adenocarcinoma and SCLC were younger than men with squamous cancer (60.6 and 60.2 versus 62.3 years; P = 0.05). Squamous cancer was the predominant type of lung cancer both in women (32.5%) and men (55.2%). However, SCLC (26.6% versus 19.9%: P <0.001) and adenocarcinoma (21.6% versus 9.6%; P <0.001) were more frequent in women than in men. Women were more frequently non-smokers than men (18.8% versus 2.4%; P <0.001). Adenocarcinoma patients smoked less intensively than patients with squamous and SCLC both in women (31.4 versus 35.8 and 33.7 packs/year; P <0.02) and in men (38.2 versus 42 and 41.9 packs/year; P <0.002). In multivariate analysis, bad performance status, advanced stage, non-surgical treatment, age >50 years at diagnosis and male gender were significant independent negative prognostic factors.
CONCLUSIONS: Lung cancer was six times more frequent in men than in women. Women with lung cancer were younger than men and smoked less intensively. Over-representation of adenocarcinoma and SCLC was observed in the women. Women with lung cancer had a better prognosis than men.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12176788     DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdf187

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Oncol        ISSN: 0923-7534            Impact factor:   32.976


  86 in total

Review 1.  Pollutional haze as a potential cause of lung cancer.

Authors:  Xuefei Shi; Hongbing Liu; Yong Song
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  Frequency of driver mutations in lung adenocarcinoma from female never-smokers varies with histologic subtypes and age at diagnosis.

Authors:  Yang Zhang; Yihua Sun; Yunjian Pan; Chenguang Li; Lei Shen; Yuan Li; Xiaoyang Luo; Ting Ye; Rui Wang; Haichuan Hu; Hang Li; Lei Wang; William Pao; Haiquan Chen
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2012-02-08       Impact factor: 12.531

3.  Sex disparities in cancer mortality and survival.

Authors:  Michael B Cook; Katherine A McGlynn; Susan S Devesa; Neal D Freedman; William F Anderson
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2011-07-12       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 4.  Lung cancer in women.

Authors:  Angela M Coscio; Jennifer Garst
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 5.  Sex-specific aspects of tumor therapy.

Authors:  Kerstin Borgmann; Ekkehard Dikomey; Cordula Petersen; Petra Feyer; Ulrike Hoeller
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2009-02-26       Impact factor: 1.925

6.  Interplay between estrogen and Stat3/NF-κB-driven immunomodulation in lung cancer.

Authors:  Shanshan Deng; Marco Ramos-Castaneda; Walter V Velasco; Michael J Clowers; Berenice A Gutierrez; Oscar Noble; Yiping Dong; Melody Zarghooni; Lucero Alvarado; Mauricio S Caetano; Shuanying Yang; Edwin J Ostrin; Carmen Behrens; Ignacio I Wistuba; Laura P Stabile; Humam Kadara; Stephanie S Watowich; Seyed Javad Moghaddam
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2020-11-13       Impact factor: 4.944

Review 7.  Lung cancer in never smokers: clinical epidemiology and environmental risk factors.

Authors:  Jonathan M Samet; Erika Avila-Tang; Paolo Boffetta; Lindsay M Hannan; Susan Olivo-Marston; Michael J Thun; Charles M Rudin
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2009-09-15       Impact factor: 12.531

8.  Prognostic significance of grading in lung adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Justine A Barletta; Beow Y Yeap; Lucian R Chirieac
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2010-02-01       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Sex as an independent prognostic factor in a population-based non-small cell lung cancer cohort.

Authors:  Marshall W Pitz; Grace Musto; Srisala Navaratnam
Journal:  Can Respir J       Date:  2013 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.409

10.  Impact of renal function on treatment options and outcomes in advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Bercin Kutluk Cenik; Han Sun; David E Gerber
Journal:  Lung Cancer       Date:  2013-03-15       Impact factor: 5.705

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.