Keisuke Kirita1,2, Takehiro Izumo3, Yuji Matsumoto1, Yoshihisa Hiraishi1, Takaaki Tsuchida1. 1. Department of Endoscopy, Respiratory Endoscopy Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1, Tukiji Chou-ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan. 2. Division of Thoracic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan. 3. Department of Endoscopy, Respiratory Endoscopy Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1, Tukiji Chou-ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan. drtake1118@gmail.com.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Currently, several acquired resistance mechanisms and rare driver oncogenes are identified in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) relapses. Re-biopsy increases valuable information to guide treatment strategies, but the utility and feasibility of bronchoscopic re-biopsy has not been investigated. METHODS: We studied 70 patients who underwent bronchoscopic for re-biopsy of NSCLC that was resistant to at least one regimen of chemotherapy or molecular-targeted therapy between January 2013 and December 2014. We assessed clinical data, technical success rate, and mutational analysis. RESULTS: Procedures performed were transbronchial biopsy (n = 52) and endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) (n = 18). Overall detection rate of re-biopsy for malignant cells was 87 % (83 % for TBB and 100 % for EBUS-TBNA). Mutational analysis was possible in almost all technically successful cases; likewise, acquired-resistant mutations (55 % of EGFR mutants) and small cell lung cancer transformation were identified from the bronchoscopy specimens. Other driver mutations were seen in four cases, including ALK fusion gene (n = 2) and ROS1 fusion gene (n = 2). There were no associated severe complications. CONCLUSION: This study shows that bronchoscopic re-biopsy for NSCLC is feasible and provides adequate samples that enable identification of resistance mutations and rare driver oncogenes.
OBJECTIVES: Currently, several acquired resistance mechanisms and rare driver oncogenes are identified in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) relapses. Re-biopsy increases valuable information to guide treatment strategies, but the utility and feasibility of bronchoscopic re-biopsy has not been investigated. METHODS: We studied 70 patients who underwent bronchoscopic for re-biopsy of NSCLC that was resistant to at least one regimen of chemotherapy or molecular-targeted therapy between January 2013 and December 2014. We assessed clinical data, technical success rate, and mutational analysis. RESULTS: Procedures performed were transbronchial biopsy (n = 52) and endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) (n = 18). Overall detection rate of re-biopsy for malignant cells was 87 % (83 % for TBB and 100 % for EBUS-TBNA). Mutational analysis was possible in almost all technically successful cases; likewise, acquired-resistant mutations (55 % of EGFR mutants) and small cell lung cancer transformation were identified from the bronchoscopy specimens. Other driver mutations were seen in four cases, including ALK fusion gene (n = 2) and ROS1 fusion gene (n = 2). There were no associated severe complications. CONCLUSION: This study shows that bronchoscopic re-biopsy for NSCLC is feasible and provides adequate samples that enable identification of resistance mutations and rare driver oncogenes.
Authors: Shirish M Gadgeel; Leena Gandhi; Gregory J Riely; Alberto A Chiappori; Howard L West; Michele C Azada; Peter N Morcos; Ruey-Min Lee; Linta Garcia; Li Yu; Frederic Boisserie; Laura Di Laurenzio; Sophie Golding; Jotaro Sato; Shumpei Yokoyama; Tomohiro Tanaka; Sai-Hong Ignatius Ou Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2014-08-18 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Lecia V Sequist; Jean-Charles Soria; Jonathan W Goldman; Heather A Wakelee; Shirish M Gadgeel; Andrea Varga; Vassiliki Papadimitrakopoulou; Benjamin J Solomon; Geoffrey R Oxnard; Rafal Dziadziuszko; Dara L Aisner; Robert C Doebele; Cathy Galasso; Edward B Garon; Rebecca S Heist; Jennifer Logan; Joel W Neal; Melody A Mendenhall; Suzanne Nichols; Zofia Piotrowska; Antoinette J Wozniak; Mitch Raponi; Chris A Karlovich; Sarah Jaw-Tsai; Jeffrey Isaacson; Darrin Despain; Shannon L Matheny; Lindsey Rolfe; Andrew R Allen; D Ross Camidge Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2015-04-30 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Anne S Tsao; Xi Ming Tang; Bradley Sabloff; Lianchun Xiao; Hisayuki Shigematsu; Jack Roth; Margaret Spitz; Waun Ki Hong; Adi Gazdar; Ignacio Wistuba Journal: J Thorac Oncol Date: 2006-03 Impact factor: 15.609
Authors: Maria E Arcila; Geoffrey R Oxnard; Khedoudja Nafa; Gregory J Riely; Stephen B Solomon; Maureen F Zakowski; Mark G Kris; William Pao; Vincent A Miller; Marc Ladanyi Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2011-01-19 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Giorgio Vittorio Scagliotti; Purvish Parikh; Joachim von Pawel; Bonne Biesma; Johan Vansteenkiste; Christian Manegold; Piotr Serwatowski; Ulrich Gatzemeier; Raghunadharao Digumarti; Mauro Zukin; Jin S Lee; Anders Mellemgaard; Keunchil Park; Shehkar Patil; Janusz Rolski; Tuncay Goksel; Filippo de Marinis; Lorinda Simms; Katherine P Sugarman; David Gandara Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2008-05-27 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: David H Johnson; Louis Fehrenbacher; William F Novotny; Roy S Herbst; John J Nemunaitis; David M Jablons; Corey J Langer; Russell F DeVore; Jacques Gaudreault; Lisa A Damico; Eric Holmgren; Fairooz Kabbinavar Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2004-06-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Joohae Kim; Hyo Jae Kang; Sung Ho Moon; Jong Mog Lee; Hyae Young Kim; Geon-Kook Lee; Jin Soo Lee; Bin Hwangbo Journal: Cancer Res Treat Date: 2019-03-15 Impact factor: 4.679
Authors: Eun Kyong Goag; Jung Mo Lee; Kyung Soo Chung; Song Yee Kim; Ah Young Leem; Joo Han Song; Ji Ye Jung; Moo Suk Park; Yoon Soo Chang; Young Sam Kim; Joon Chang; Eun Young Kim Journal: J Cancer Date: 2018-03-02 Impact factor: 4.207