Literature DB >> 23468410

Development of a computer-based clinical decision support tool for selecting appropriate rehabilitation interventions for injured workers.

Douglas P Gross1, Jing Zhang, Ivan Steenstra, Susan Barnsley, Calvin Haws, Tyler Amell, Greg McIntosh, Juliette Cooper, Osmar Zaiane.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To develop a classification algorithm and accompanying computer-based clinical decision support tool to help categorize injured workers toward optimal rehabilitation interventions based on unique worker characteristics.
METHODS: Population-based historical cohort design. Data were extracted from a Canadian provincial workers' compensation database on all claimants undergoing work assessment between December 2009 and January 2011. Data were available on: (1) numerous personal, clinical, occupational, and social variables; (2) type of rehabilitation undertaken; and (3) outcomes following rehabilitation (receiving time loss benefits or undergoing repeat programs). Machine learning, concerned with the design of algorithms to discriminate between classes based on empirical data, was the foundation of our approach to build a classification system with multiple independent and dependent variables.
RESULTS: The population included 8,611 unique claimants. Subjects were predominantly employed (85 %) males (64 %) with diagnoses of sprain/strain (44 %). Baseline clinician classification accuracy was high (ROC = 0.86) for selecting programs that lead to successful return-to-work. Classification performance for machine learning techniques outperformed the clinician baseline classification (ROC = 0.94). The final classifiers were multifactorial and included the variables: injury duration, occupation, job attachment status, work status, modified work availability, pain intensity rating, self-rated occupational disability, and 9 items from the SF-36 Health Survey.
CONCLUSIONS: The use of machine learning classification techniques appears to have resulted in classification performance better than clinician decision-making. The final algorithm has been integrated into a computer-based clinical decision support tool that requires additional validation in a clinical sample.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23468410     DOI: 10.1007/s10926-013-9430-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Occup Rehabil        ISSN: 1053-0487


  53 in total

1.  Effectiveness of clinical decision support in controlling inappropriate imaging.

Authors:  C Craig Blackmore; Robert S Mecklenburg; Gary S Kaplan
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 5.532

Review 2.  Reducing sickness absence from work due to low back pain: how well do intervention strategies match modifiable risk factors?

Authors:  William S Shaw; Steven J Linton; Glenn Pransky
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2006-12

Review 3.  Psychosocial aspects of disabling musculoskeletal pain.

Authors:  Ana-Maria Vranceanu; Arthur Barsky; David Ring
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Validation of a risk factor-based intervention strategy model using data from the readiness for return to work cohort study.

Authors:  Ivan A Steenstra; Selahadin A Ibrahim; Renée-Louise Franche; Sheilah Hogg-Johnson; William S Shaw; Glenn S Pransky
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2010-09

5.  The short form-36 health survey questionnaire in spine surgery.

Authors:  M Grevitt; R Khazim; J Webb; R Mulholland; J Shepperd
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1997-01

6.  Relationship between categorization with the STarT Back Screening Tool and prognosis for people receiving physical therapy for low back pain.

Authors:  Julie M Fritz; Jason M Beneciuk; Steven Z George
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2011-03-30

7.  Treatment- and cost-effectiveness of early intervention for acute low-back pain patients: a one-year prospective study.

Authors:  Robert J Gatchel; Peter B Polatin; Carl Noe; Margaret Gardea; Carla Pulliam; Judy Thompson
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2003-03

8.  Expenditures and health status among adults with back and neck problems.

Authors:  Brook I Martin; Richard A Deyo; Sohail K Mirza; Judith A Turner; Bryan A Comstock; William Hollingworth; Sean D Sullivan
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2008-02-13       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Relationship of the Pain Disability Index (PDI) and the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire (ODQ) with three dynamic physical tests in a group of patients with chronic low-back and leg pain.

Authors:  M Grönblad; E Järvinen; H Hurri; M Hupli; E O Karaharju
Journal:  Clin J Pain       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 3.442

Review 10.  Computerized clinical decision support systems for chronic disease management: a decision-maker-researcher partnership systematic review.

Authors:  Pavel S Roshanov; Shikha Misra; Hertzel C Gerstein; Amit X Garg; Rolf J Sebaldt; Jean A Mackay; Lorraine Weise-Kelly; Tamara Navarro; Nancy L Wilczynski; R Brian Haynes
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2011-08-03       Impact factor: 7.327

View more
  9 in total

1.  Procedures to develop a computerized adaptive test to assess patient-reported physical functioning.

Authors:  Erin McCabe; Douglas P Gross; Okan Bulut
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2018-06-07       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Characteristics and Prognostic Factors for Return to Work in Public Safety Personnel with Work-Related Posttraumatic Stress Injury Undergoing Rehabilitation.

Authors:  Douglas P Gross; Geoffrey S Rachor; Shelby S Yamamoto; Bruce D Dick; Cary Brown; Ambikaipakan Senthilselvan; Sebastian Straube; Charl Els; Tanya Jackson; Suzette Brémault-Phillips; Don Voaklander; Jarett Stastny; Theodore Berry
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2021-03-09

3.  Reference values for the SF-36 in Canadian injured workers undergoing rehabilitation.

Authors:  Douglas P Gross; Fahad S Algarni; Riikka Niemeläinen
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2015-03

4.  Physiotherapy for injured workers in Canada: are insurers' and clinics' policies threatening good quality and equity of care? Results of a qualitative study.

Authors:  Anne Hudon; Matthew Hunt; Debbie Ehrmann Feldman
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-09-03       Impact factor: 2.655

Review 5.  Ethical Considerations of Using Machine Learning for Decision Support in Occupational Health: An Example Involving Periodic Workers' Health Assessments.

Authors:  Marianne W M C Six Dijkstra; Egbert Siebrand; Steven Dorrestijn; Etto L Salomons; Michiel F Reneman; Frits G J Oosterveld; Remko Soer; Douglas P Gross; Hendrik J Bieleman
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2020-09

6.  Development of a quantitative evaluation system for visuo-motor control in three-dimensional virtual reality space.

Authors:  Woong Choi; Jongho Lee; Naoki Yanagihara; Liang Li; Jaehyo Kim
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-09-07       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Exploratory application of machine learning methods on patient reported data in the development of supervised models for predicting outcomes.

Authors:  Deepika Verma; Duncan Jansen; Kerstin Bach; Mannes Poel; Paul Jarle Mork; Wendy Oude Nijeweme d'Hollosy
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2022-09-01       Impact factor: 3.298

Review 8.  Clinical Decision Support Tools for Selecting Interventions for Patients with Disabling Musculoskeletal Disorders: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Douglas P Gross; Susan Armijo-Olivo; William S Shaw; Kelly Williams-Whitt; Nicola T Shaw; Jan Hartvigsen; Ziling Qin; Christine Ha; Linda J Woodhouse; Ivan A Steenstra
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2016-09

9.  TrhOnt: building an ontology to assist rehabilitation processes.

Authors:  Idoia Berges; David Antón; Jesús Bermúdez; Alfredo Goñi; Arantza Illarramendi
Journal:  J Biomed Semantics       Date:  2016-10-04
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.