Literature DB >> 23465822

Perinatal outcomes in 375 children born after oocyte donation: a Danish national cohort study.

Sara S Malchau1, Anne Loft, Elisabeth C Larsen, Anna-Karina Aaris Henningsen, Steen Rasmussen, Anders Nyboe Andersen, Anja Pinborg.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe perinatal outcomes in children born after oocyte donation (OD) compared with in vitro fertilization (IVF), intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), and spontaneous conception (SC).
DESIGN: National cohort study.
SETTING: Fertility clinics. PATIENT(S): Three hundred seventy-five children born after OD during the period 1995-2010. INTERVENTION(S): None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Mean birth weight, mean gestational age, risks of low birth weight (LBW), preterm birth (PTB), congenital malformations, cesarean delivery, preeclampsia, and admittance to neonatal intensive care unit. RESULT(S): We found an increased risk of PTB in OD pregnancies. The adjusted odds ratio (AOR) of PTB in OD singletons was 1.8 (95% CI, 1.2-2.69), 2.5 (95% CI, 1.7-3.6), and 3.4 (95% CI, 2.3-4.9) compared with IVF, ICSI, and SC, respectively. The risk of LBW was also increased. The AOR of LBW was 1.4 (95% CI, 0.9-2.2), 1.8 (95% CI, 1.2-2.8), and 2.6 (95% CI, 1.7-4.0) compared with IVF, ICSI, and SC. The risk of preeclampsia was increased in OD pregnancies with an AOR of 2.9 (95% CI, 1.8-4.6), 2.8 (95% CI, 1.7-4.5), and 3.1 (95% CI, 1.9-4.9) compared with IVF, ICSI, and SC. After additional adjustment for preeclampsia, perinatal outcome improved. Among the twins, the difference between the groups was less pronounced. CONCLUSION(S): Pregnancies after OD have a poorer perinatal outcome than those after standard IVF and ICSI mainly because of the high prevalence of preeclampsia.
Copyright © 2013 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23465822     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.01.128

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  20 in total

1.  Assisted reproduction and risk of preterm birth in singletons by infertility diagnoses and treatment modalities: a population-based study.

Authors:  Galit Levi Dunietz; Claudia Holzman; Yujia Zhang; Chenxi Li; David Todem; Sheree L Boulet; Patricia McKane; Dmitry M Kissin; Glenn Copeland; Dana Bernson; Michael P Diamond
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-07-28       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Twin pregnancy in a 51-year-old woman who underwent autologous cryopreservation at the age of 36 years: case report.

Authors:  Tomoki Kotera; Takashi Shibata; Hiroki Kato; Hirohiko Watanabe; Satoshi Nakago
Journal:  Reprod Med Biol       Date:  2016-01-05

3.  Comparison of perinatal outcomes following frozen embryo transfer cycles using autologous versus donor oocytes in women 40 to 43 years old: analysis of SART CORS data.

Authors:  Bo Yu; Mario Vega; Sahar Zaghi; Rani Fritz; Sangita Jindal; Erkan Buyuk
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2018-08-20       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Assisted reproductive technology and the risk of preterm birth among primiparas.

Authors:  Galit Levi Dunietz; Claudia Holzman; Patricia McKane; Chenxi Li; Sheree L Boulet; David Todem; Dmitry M Kissin; Glenn Copeland; Dana Bernson; William M Sappenfield; Michael P Diamond
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2015-02-20       Impact factor: 7.329

5.  Is the risk of preeclampsia higher in donor oocyte pregnancies? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Juan Enrique Schwarze; Paula Borda; Pamela Vásquez; Carolina Ortega; Sonia Villa; Javier A Crosby; Ricardo Pommer
Journal:  JBRA Assist Reprod       Date:  2018-03-01

Review 6.  Risk of adverse pregnancy and perinatal outcomes after high technology infertility treatment: a comprehensive systematic review.

Authors:  Stefano Palomba; Roy Homburg; Susanna Santagni; Giovanni Battista La Sala; Raoul Orvieto
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2016-11-04       Impact factor: 5.211

7.  Neonatal outcomes in pregnancies resulting from oocyte donation: a cohort study in Sweden.

Authors:  Evangelia Elenis; Gunilla Sydsjö; Alkistis Skalkidou; Claudia Lampic; Agneta Skoog Svanberg
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2016-10-21       Impact factor: 2.125

8.  Assisted reproductive technology and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: systematic review and meta-analyses.

Authors:  Hui Ju Chih; Flavia T S Elias; Laura Gaudet; Maria P Velez
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2021-06-28       Impact factor: 3.007

9.  Adverse obstetric outcomes in pregnancies resulting from oocyte donation: a retrospective cohort case study in Sweden.

Authors:  Evangelia Elenis; Agneta Skoog Svanberg; Claudia Lampic; Alkistis Skalkidou; Helena Åkerud; Gunilla Sydsjö
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2015-10-08       Impact factor: 3.007

Review 10.  Congenital Malformations in Infants of Mothers Undergoing Assisted Reproductive Technologies: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Study.

Authors:  Hayedeh Hoorsan; Parvin Mirmiran; Shahla Chaichian; Yousef Moradi; Roza Hoorsan; Fatemeh Jesmi
Journal:  J Prev Med Public Health       Date:  2017-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.