Literature DB >> 23463552

Genetic associations between daily BW gain and live fleshiness of station-tested young bulls and carcass and meat quality traits of commercial intact males in Piemontese cattle.

V Bonfatti1, A Albera, P Carnier.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate genetic relationships between beef traits of station-tested young bulls and carcass and meat quality traits (MQ) of commercial intact males in Piemontese cattle. Phenotypes for daily gain (DG) and live fleshiness traits (width at withers: WW; shoulder muscularity: SM; loin width: LW; loin thickness: LT; thigh muscularity: TM; thigh profile: TP) and thinness of the shin bone (BT) were available for 3,109 and 2,183 performance-tested young bulls, respectively. Carcass daily gain (CDG), carcass conformation (SEUS), pH at 24 h (pH24h) and 8 d after slaughter (pH8d), lightness (L*), redness (a*), yellowness (b*), hue angle (HA), saturation index (SI), drip loss (DL), cooking loss (CL), and shear force (SF) were assessed for 1,208 commercial intact males. (Co) variance components were estimated in a set of twelve 9-traits analyses using REML and linear animal models including all performance-test traits and 1 carcass or MQ trait at a time. Heritabilities ± SE of beef traits ranged from 0.26 ± 0.03 (LW) to 0.47 ± 0.01 (DG), whereas those of carcass traits and MQ from 0.06 ± 0.03 (CL) to 0.63 ± 0.04 (HA). The genetic correlation (rg) between DG and CDG was 0.75 ± 0.10, indicating that DG, as measured at the test station, is a good indicator of the carcass gain achieved by commercial animals under farms conditions. Daily BW gain of station-tested bulls correlated positively with color traits (from 0.11 ± 0.12 to 0.54 ± 0.09), ph8d (rg ± SE = 0.31 ± 0.11), DL (rg ± SE = 0.29 ± 0.17), and CL (rg ± SE = 0.27 ± 0.18). Live fleshiness of station-tested bulls exhibited genetic correlations with MQ of commercial animals that were positive for L* and b* (from 0.13 ± 0.08 to 0.65 ± 0.14) and negative for pH (from -0.27 ± 0.15 to -0.57 ± 0.11), CL (from -0.16 ± 0.23 to -0.43 ± 0.22), and SF (TM: rg ± SE = -0.31 ± 0.15; TP: rg ± SE = -0.41 ± 0.17). The thinness of the shin bone correlated unfavorably with CDG (rg ± SE = -0.74 ± 0.07) and favorably with SEUS (rg ± SE = 0.65 ± 0.17), CL (rg ± SE = -0.39 ± 0.13), and SF (rg ± SE = -0.32 ± 0.17). The estimated genetic correlations indicate that selection to increase DG, as measured at the test station, exerts moderate adverse effects on MQ. Because selection emphasis is greater for live fleshiness than for DG, the correlated response in MQ and carcass traits is expected to be influenced to a greater extent by selection for muscularity, even though these traits are less heritable than DG.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23463552     DOI: 10.2527/jas.2012-5386

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  8 in total

1.  Genetic variances and covariances of live weight traits in Charolais cattle by multi-trait analysis.

Authors:  J B Herrera-Ojeda; G M Parra-Bracamonte; N Lopez-Villalobos; J C Martínez-González; J G Magaña-Monforte; S T Morris; L A López-Bustamante
Journal:  J Appl Genet       Date:  2019-08-12       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Linear classification scores in beef cattle as predictors of genetic merit for individual carcass primal cut yields1.

Authors:  Donagh P Berry; Thierry Pabiou; Rory Fanning; Ross D Evans; Michelle M Judge
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-05-30       Impact factor: 3.159

3.  Genetic analysis of carcass and meat quality traits in Nelore cattle1.

Authors:  Daniel Gustavo M Gordo; Rafael Espigolan; Tiago Bresolin; Gerardo A Fernandes Júnior; Ana F B Magalhães; Camila U Braz; Willian Bruno Fernandes; Fernando Baldi; Lucia G Albuquerque
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-09-07       Impact factor: 3.159

4.  Beef trait genetic parameters based on old and recent data and its implications for genomic predictions in Italian Simmental cattle.

Authors:  Alberto Cesarani; Jorge Hidalgo; Andre Garcia; Lorenzo Degano; Daniele Vicario; Yutaka Masuda; Ignacy Misztal; Daniela Lourenco
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2020-08-01       Impact factor: 3.159

Review 5.  Consumer Perception of Beef Quality and How to Control, Improve and Predict It? Focus on Eating Quality.

Authors:  Jingjing Liu; Marie-Pierre Ellies-Oury; Todor Stoyanchev; Jean-François Hocquette
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2022-06-13

6.  Oxidative Stress and Total Antioxidant Status During Internal Carotid Artery Clamping with or without Shunting: An Experimental Pilot Study.

Authors:  Anastasios Papapetrou; Demetrios Moris; Nikolaos Patelis; George N Kouvelos; Chris Bakogiannis; Chris Klonaris; Sotiris Georgopoulos
Journal:  Med Sci Monit Basic Res       Date:  2015-09-22

7.  Selection Response Due to Different Combination of Antagonistic Milk, Beef, and Morphological Traits in the Alpine Grey Cattle Breed.

Authors:  Enrico Mancin; Cristina Sartori; Nadia Guzzo; Beniamino Tuliozi; Roberto Mantovani
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-08       Impact factor: 2.752

8.  Genetic Parameter Estimates of Carcass Traits under National Scale Breeding Scheme for Beef Cattle.

Authors:  ChangHee Do; ByungHo Park; SiDong Kim; TaeJung Choi; BohSuk Yang; SuBong Park; HyungJun Song
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2016-03-22       Impact factor: 2.509

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.