| Literature DB >> 23463224 |
Michelle K Smith1, Mary Pat Wenderoth, Mary Tyler.
Abstract
Many institutions require candidates for faculty positions to present a teaching demonstration as part of the interview process. To help job candidates prepare for this and to assist departments in planning how to structure this portion of the interview, we surveyed biology faculty from community and liberal arts colleges and master's- and PhD-granting institutions concerning how their departments assess teaching potential. We also asked survey respondents to share advice on how candidates can prepare for teaching demonstrations. Here we report on the survey results and offer suggestions based on comments from respondents.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23463224 PMCID: PMC3587851 DOI: 10.1187/cbe.12-09-0161
Source DB: PubMed Journal: CBE Life Sci Educ ISSN: 1931-7913 Impact factor: 3.325
Demographic information on survey respondents
| Institution type | Number of respondents | Current position |
|---|---|---|
| Community college | 30 | Full professor: 40% |
| Associate professor: 13% | ||
| Assistant professor: 10% | ||
| Lecturer: 37% | ||
| Other: 0% | ||
| Primarily undergraduate institution | 35 | Full professor: 26% |
| Associate professor: 37% | ||
| Assistant professor: 31% | ||
| Lecturer: 3% | ||
| Other: 3% | ||
| Master's degree granting | 7 | Full professor: 14% |
| Associate professor: 72% | ||
| Assistant professor: 14% | ||
| Lecturer: 0% | ||
| Other: 0% | ||
| PhD granting | 41 | Full professor: 35% |
| Associate professor: 26% | ||
| Assistant professor: 21% | ||
| Lecturer: 16% | ||
| Other: 2% |
The requirement for job candidates to do a teaching demonstration varies by institution type
| The job candidate is required to give … | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Institution type | just a research talk (%) | a research talk and a teaching demonstration (%) | just a teaching demonstration (%) | Othera (%) | |
| Community college | 0 | 6.7 | 83.3 | 10.0 | 30 |
| Primarily undergraduate institution | 34.3 | 34.3 | 20.0 | 11.4 | 35 |
| Master's degree granting | 42.9 | 57.1 | 0 | 0 | 7 |
| PhD granting | 43.9 | 36.6 | 0 | 19.5 | 41 |
a“Other” includes alternatives to teaching demonstration, such as informal discussion about teaching or chalk-talk (with chalk only, no slides).
The importance of the teaching demonstration relative to the research talk at different institution types
| The candidate's performance on the teaching demonstration carries … | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Institution typea | ||||
| Primarily undergraduate institution | 41.7 | 0 | 58.3 | 12 |
| Master's degree granting | 50.0 | 25.0 | 25.0 | 4 |
| PhD granting | 0 | 53.3 | 46.7 | 15 |
aCommunity college is omitted, because there was only one respondent to this question.
bRespondents were faculty who vote on hiring decisions and are in a department in which both a teaching demonstration and a research talk are required.
The role of teaching in tenure and promotion separated by institution type
| How much do teaching and teaching evaluations determine tenure and promotion in your department? | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Institution type | Teaching does not contribute, only research effort is important (%) | Teaching evaluations must be adequate (not bad) (%) | Teaching is heavily weighted (%) | |
| Community college | 0 | 14.3 | 85.7 | 28 |
| Primarily undergraduate institution | 0 | 14.3 | 85.7 | 35 |
| Master's degree granting | 0 | 57.1 | 42.9 | 7 |
| PhD granting | 4.8 | 78.6 | 16.6 | 42 |
The ranked importance of elements of a teaching demonstrationa
| Statement | Mean scoreb | |
|---|---|---|
| Q21. | The candidate's content information is accurate. | 3.86 |
| Q12. | The candidate's presentation would be understandable to students. | 3.82 |
| Q18. | The candidate is able to organize material effectively. | 3.73 |
| Q4. | The candidate pitches the talk at the correct level for the intended audience. | 3.68 |
| Q7. | The candidate introduces topics in a way that connects to the audience (asking questions, emphasizing the relevance of the topic, etc.). | 3.63 |
| Q9. | The candidate demonstrates his/her knowledge about the topic. | 3.60 |
| Q1. | The candidate is enthusiastic. | 3.56 |
| Q6. | The candidate appears confident in his/her ability to teach. | 3.52 |
| Q8. | The candidate covers the appropriate amount of material for the given time and level of student. | 3.40 |
| Q11. | The candidate speaks at a comfortable pace. | 3.22 |
| Q10. | The candidate's slides are easy to read. | 3.20 |
| Q14. | The candidate asks if the audience has questions during the presentation. | 3.02 |
| Q3. | When asked a question, the candidate facilitates a discussion, rather than just telling the answer. | 2.66 |
| Q13. | The candidate provides a wrap-up at the end. | 2.62 |
| Q16. | The candidate allows wait time (at least 3–5 s) for the audience to think about questions posed. | 2.58 |
| Q17. | The candidate incorporates elements of active learning (e.g. discussion, small-group work, clicker questions). | 2.52 |
| Q15. | The candidate gives a clear indication of his/her teaching philosophy. | 2.48 |
| Q5. | The candidate discusses how he/she would assess student learning on an exam or other future assignment. | 2.26 |
| Q19. | The candidate explains why he/she is using certain teaching strategies. | 2.02 |
| Q2. | The candidate brings in materials, such as a printout of slides, that he/she would hand out in class. | 1.98 |
a1 = not important to 4 = very important.
bBased on the opinion of 49 respondents who vote on tenure-track hiring decisions and are in a department in which a teaching demonstration is part of the interview process.
Figure 1.A comparison of how faculty from different institution types ranked the importance of two statements on the survey. (A) Responses to Q5: “The candidate discusses how he/she would assess student learning on an exam or other future assignment.” (B) Responses to Q19: “The candidate explains why he/she is using certain teaching strategies.” Error bars show the range limits of faculty answers.
Resources to help job candidates become familiar with active learning
| Topic | Resource |
|---|---|
| Information on scientific teaching methods | |
| Classroom assessment techniques | |
| Clickers | Videos and instructor guide: |
| Information on research relating to clickers: | |
| Workshops | FIRST IV for postdoctoral fellows: |
| National Academies Summer Institute on Undergraduate Biology Education: | |
| Meetings | Society for the Advancement of Biology Education Research: |
| Lilly Conference on College and University Teaching: |