Literature DB >> 23463095

Quantitative FRET (Förster Resonance Energy Transfer) analysis for SENP1 protease kinetics determination.

Yan Liu1, Jiayu Liao.   

Abstract

Reversible posttranslational modifications of proteins with ubiquitin or ubiquitin-like proteins (Ubls) are widely used to dynamically regulate protein activity and have diverse roles in many biological processes. For example, SUMO covalently modifies a large number or proteins with important roles in many cellular processes, including cell-cycle regulation, cell survival and death, DNA damage response, and stress response 1-5. SENP, as SUMO-specific protease, functions as an endopeptidase in the maturation of SUMO precursors or as an isopeptidase to remove SUMO from its target proteins and refresh the SUMOylation cycle (1,3,6,7). The catalytic efficiency or specificity of an enzyme is best characterized by the ratio of the kinetic constants, kcat/KM. In several studies, the kinetic parameters of SUMO-SENP pairs have been determined by various methods, including polyacrylamide gel-based western-blot, radioactive-labeled substrate, fluorescent compound or protein labeled substrate (8-13). However, the polyacrylamide-gel-based techniques, which used the "native" proteins but are laborious and technically demanding, that do not readily lend themselves to detailed quantitative analysis. The obtained kcat/KM from studies using tetrapeptides or proteins with an ACC (7-amino-4-carbamoylmetylcoumarin) or AMC (7-amino-4-methylcoumarin) fluorophore were either up to two orders of magnitude lower than the natural substrates or cannot clearly differentiate the iso- and endopeptidase activities of SENPs. Recently, FRET-based protease assays were used to study the deubiquitinating enzymes (DUBs) or SENPs with the FRET pair of cyan fluorescent protein (CFP) and yellow fluorescent protein (YFP) (9,10,14,15). The ratio of acceptor emission to donor emission was used as the quantitative parameter for FRET signal monitor for protease activity determination. However, this method ignored signal cross-contaminations at the acceptor and donor emission wavelengths by acceptor and donor self-fluorescence and thus was not accurate. We developed a novel highly sensitive and quantitative FRET-based protease assay for determining the kinetic parameters of pre-SUMO1 maturation by SENP1. An engineered FRET pair CyPet and YPet with significantly improved FRET efficiency and fluorescence quantum yield, were used to generate the CyPet-(pre-SUMO1)-YPet substrate (16). We differentiated and quantified absolute fluorescence signals contributed by the donor and acceptor and FRET at the acceptor and emission wavelengths, respectively. The value of kcat/KM was obtained as (3.2 ± 0.55) x10(7) M(-1)s(-1) of SENP1 toward pre-SUMO1, which is in agreement with general enzymatic kinetic parameters. Therefore, this methodology is valid and can be used as a general approach to characterize other proteases as well.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23463095      PMCID: PMC3605757          DOI: 10.3791/4430

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis Exp        ISSN: 1940-087X            Impact factor:   1.355


  16 in total

Review 1.  SUMO, ubiquitin's mysterious cousin.

Authors:  S Müller; C Hoege; G Pyrowolakis; S Jentsch
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 94.444

Review 2.  Protein modification by SUMO.

Authors:  Erica S Johnson
Journal:  Annu Rev Biochem       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 23.643

Review 3.  SUMO and ubiquitin in the nucleus: different functions, similar mechanisms?

Authors:  Grace Gill
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2004-09-01       Impact factor: 11.361

4.  A substrate for deubiquitinating enzymes based on time-resolved fluorescence resonance energy transfer between terbium and yellow fluorescent protein.

Authors:  Robert A Horton; Elizabeth A Strachan; Kurt W Vogel; Steven M Riddle
Journal:  Anal Biochem       Date:  2006-08-10       Impact factor: 3.365

5.  Evolutionary optimization of fluorescent proteins for intracellular FRET.

Authors:  Annalee W Nguyen; Patrick S Daugherty
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2005-02-06       Impact factor: 54.908

Review 6.  SUMO: a history of modification.

Authors:  Ronald T Hay
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2005-04-01       Impact factor: 17.970

7.  Structural basis for SENP2 protease interactions with SUMO precursors and conjugated substrates.

Authors:  David Reverter; Christopher D Lima
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2006-11-12       Impact factor: 15.369

8.  Distribution and paralogue specificity of mammalian deSUMOylating enzymes.

Authors:  Nagamalleswari Kolli; Jowita Mikolajczyk; Marcin Drag; Debaditya Mukhopadhyay; Nela Moffatt; Mary Dasso; Guy Salvesen; Keith D Wilkinson
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 3.857

9.  A time-resolved fluorescence resonance energy transfer-based assay for DEN1 peptidase activity.

Authors:  Ingo H Engels; Catherine Daguia; Truc Huynh; Hugo Urbina; Jörg Buddenkotte; Andrew Schumacher; Jeremy S Caldwell; Achim Brinker
Journal:  Anal Biochem       Date:  2009-03-27       Impact factor: 3.365

10.  SUMO protease SENP1 induces isomerization of the scissile peptide bond.

Authors:  Linnan Shen; Michael H Tatham; Changjiang Dong; Anna Zagórska; James H Naismith; Ronald T Hay
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2006-11-12       Impact factor: 15.369

View more
  3 in total

1.  Engineering pre-SUMO4 as efficient substrate of SENP2.

Authors:  Yan Liu; Chris A Kieslich; Dimitrios Morikis; Jiayu Liao
Journal:  Protein Eng Des Sel       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 1.650

2.  Isopeptidase Kinetics Determination by a Real Time and Sensitive qFRET Approach.

Authors:  Yan Liu; Yali Shen; Yang Song; Lei Xu; J Jefferson P Perry; Jiayu Liao
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2021-04-30

3.  Protease Activity Profiling of Snake Venoms Using High-Throughput Peptide Screening.

Authors:  Konstantinos Kalogeropoulos; Andreas Frederik Treschow; Ulrich Auf dem Keller; Teresa Escalante; Alexandra Rucavado; José María Gutiérrez; Andreas Hougaard Laustsen; Christopher T Workman
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2019-03-19       Impact factor: 4.546

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.