Literature DB >> 23459787

Aorto-hepatic bypass in liver transplantation in the MELD-era: outcomes after supraceliac and infrarenal bypasses.

Richard Hummel1, Sabrina Irmscher, Christina Schleicher, Norbert Senninger, Jens G Brockmann, Heiner H Wolters.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Poor arterial inflow during orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) may necessitate arterial revascularisation using aorto-hepatic bypasses with supraceliac (SC) or infrarenal (IR) allografts. This study compared both techniques focusing on the patients' preoperative conditions, postoperative graft/organ function, complications and survival.
METHODS: Fifteen out of 114 OLT patients underwent revascularisation (7 IR/8 SC) between 2005 and 2008 and were included in the study. The patients' records were reviewed retrospectively.
RESULTS: IR patients presented with a higher BMI, received more male donor organs and their reperfusion sequence was predominately portal venous (SC: primary arterial). SC patients presented a significantly worse preoperative creatinine clearance and a trend towards a higher MELD score. The postoperative graft/organ function, morbidity and mortality did not differ between the groups despite a trend towards a worse survival in the SC group. A deteriorated preoperative creatinine clearance and higher MELD score negatively impacted the survival. Postoperative bleeding episodes and major re-interventions also affected the outcome.
CONCLUSIONS: We found no evidence for superiority of either bypass technique in our OLT patients. The trend toward a worse survival in SC patients was most likely caused by the worse preoperative conditions of these patients and highlights the importance of the impact of the MELD score on the outcome after OLT.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23459787     DOI: 10.1007/s00595-013-0513-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Today        ISSN: 0941-1291            Impact factor:   2.549


  32 in total

Review 1.  Transarterial chemoembolization as a bridge to liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: an evidence-based analysis.

Authors:  M Lesurtel; B Müllhaupt; B C Pestalozzi; T Pfammatter; P-A Clavien
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2006-08-25       Impact factor: 8.086

2.  Impact of MELD on short-term and long-term outcome following liver transplantation: a European perspective.

Authors:  Evi Nagler; Hans Van Vlierberghe; Isabelle Colle; Roberto Troisi; Bernard de Hemptinne
Journal:  Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 2.566

3.  Selective revascularization of hepatic artery thromboses after liver transplantation improves patient and graft survival.

Authors:  P A Sheiner; C V Varma; J V Guarrera; J Cooper; M Garatti; S Emre; S R Guy; M E Schwartz; C M Miller
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  1997-11-15       Impact factor: 4.939

4.  Is MELD score sufficient to predict not only death on waiting list, but also post-transplant survival?

Authors:  Gerd R Silberhumer; Hubert Hetz; Susanne Rasoul-Rockenschaub; Markus Peck-Radosavljevic; Thomas Soliman; Rudolf Steininger; Ferdinand Muehlbacher; Gabriela A Berlakovich
Journal:  Transpl Int       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.782

5.  Prognosis after liver transplantation predicted by preoperative MELD score.

Authors:  D J Kim; S-K Lee; J W Jo; S J Kim; C H D Kwon; J W Park; Y S Han; J B Park
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 1.066

6.  Hepatic arterial complications in liver transplant recipients treated with pretransplantation chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  H M Richard; J E Silberzweig; H A Mitty; W Y Lou; J Ahn; J M Cooper
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Use of arterial conduit as an alternative technique in arterial revascularization during orthotopic liver transplantation.

Authors:  F Zamboni; A Franchello; A Ricchiuti; F Fop; M Rizzetto; M Salizzoni
Journal:  Dig Liver Dis       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 4.088

8.  Analysis of liver transplantation outcome in patients with MELD Score > or = 30.

Authors:  B H Ferraz-Neto; M P V C Zurstrassen; R Hidalgo; S P Meira-Filho; M B Rezende; A T Paes; R C Afonso
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 1.066

9.  A correlation between the pretransplantation MELD score and mortality in the first two years after liver transplantation.

Authors:  Nicholas N Onaca; Marlon F Levy; Edmund Q Sanchez; Srinath Chinnakotla; Carlos G Fasola; Mark J Thomas; Jeffrey S Weinstein; Natalie G Murray; Robert M Goldstein; Goran B Klintmalm
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 5.799

10.  Acute renal failure after liver transplantation in MELD era.

Authors:  S Faenza; E Bernardi; M Cimatti; A Dante; E Mancini; Z Miklosova; E Piraccini; E Pierucci; I Riganello; S Spedicato; A Zanoni; A Santoro
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  2007 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.066

View more
  2 in total

1.  Salvage aorto-hepatic jump graft for hepatic artery thrombosis following living donor liver transplantation: a case report with 10-year follow-up.

Authors:  Jin Uk Choi; Shin Hwang; Chul-Soo Ahn; Deok-Bog Moon; Gil-Chun Park
Journal:  Korean J Transplant       Date:  2021-12-31

2.  Placement of an Aortohepatic Conduit as an Alternative to Standard Arterial Anastomosis in Liver Transplantation.

Authors:  Dong-Hwan Jung; Cheon-Soo Park; Tae-Yong Ha; Gi-Won Song; Gil-Chun Park; Yong-Pil Cho; Sung-Gyu Lee
Journal:  Ann Transplant       Date:  2018-01-19       Impact factor: 1.530

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.