Literature DB >> 12548503

A correlation between the pretransplantation MELD score and mortality in the first two years after liver transplantation.

Nicholas N Onaca1, Marlon F Levy, Edmund Q Sanchez, Srinath Chinnakotla, Carlos G Fasola, Mark J Thomas, Jeffrey S Weinstein, Natalie G Murray, Robert M Goldstein, Goran B Klintmalm.   

Abstract

The Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score is now the criteria for allocation in liver transplantation for patients with chronic disease. Although the score has been effective in the prediction of mortality in patients awaiting liver transplantation, its abilities to predict posttransplantation outcome need study. The aim of this study is to compare outcome in the first 2 years after liver transplantation according to the pretransplantation MELD score. The study includes 669 consecutive patients who underwent primary liver transplantation between December 1993 and October 1999 in a single transplant center. Patients who died of malignancy were excluded from the series. Pretransplantation MELD score was calculated using the United Network for Organ Sharing formula. Patients were stratified according to MELD score less than 15, 15 to 24, and 25 and higher. Posttransplantation survival at 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months was significantly lower in the groups with a higher MELD score. The difference was significant for hepatitis C and noncholestatic liver diseases, but not cholestatic diseases. In patients with a MELD score between 15 and 24, survival was significantly greater with cholestatic diseases and lower in patients with hepatitis C. In our study, pretransplantation MELD score correlates with survival in the first 2 years after transplantation. There is a survival advantage for patients with cholestatic diseases compared with those with hepatitis C. These findings suggest the need to readjust MELD score-based allocation decisions to consider patient outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12548503     DOI: 10.1053/jlts.2003.50027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Liver Transpl        ISSN: 1527-6465            Impact factor:   5.799


  26 in total

1.  Value of the SOFA score as a predictive model for short-term survival in high-risk liver transplant recipients with a pre-transplant labMELD score ≥ 30.

Authors:  Harald Schrem; Melanie Reichert; Benedikt Reichert; Thomas Becker; Frank Lehner; Moritz Kleine; Hüseyin Bektas; Kai Johanning; Christian P Strassburg; Jürgen Klempnauer
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 3.445

2.  Development of a survival evaluation model for liver transplant recipients with hepatocellular carcinoma secondary to hepatitis B.

Authors:  Ming Zhang; Bo Li; Lu-Nan Yan; Fei Yin; Tian-Fu Wen; Yong Zeng; Ji-Chun Zhao; Yu-Kui Ma
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-02-28       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Pre-transplant MELD and sodium MELD scores are poor predictors of graft failure and mortality after liver transplantation.

Authors:  Jacek B Cywinski; Edward J Mascha; Jing You; Daniel I Sessler; Leonardo Kapural; Maged Argalious; Brian M Parker
Journal:  Hepatol Int       Date:  2011-02-17       Impact factor: 6.047

4.  Risk Factors of Postoperative Delirium in the Intensive Care Unit After Liver Transplantation.

Authors:  Hannah Lee; Seung-Young Oh; Je Hyuk Yu; Jeongsoo Kim; Sehee Yoon; Ho Geol Ryu
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Optimal utilization of donor grafts with extended criteria: a single-center experience in over 1000 liver transplants.

Authors:  Andrew M Cameron; R Mark Ghobrial; Hasan Yersiz; Douglas G Farmer; Gerald S Lipshutz; Sherilyn A Gordon; Michael Zimmerman; Johnny Hong; Thomas E Collins; Jeffery Gornbein; Farin Amersi; Michael Weaver; Carlos Cao; Tony Chen; Jonathan R Hiatt; Ronald W Busuttil
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Survival outcomes in liver transplant recipients with Model for End-stage Liver Disease scores of 40 or higher: a decade-long experience.

Authors:  Hina J Panchal; Joel B Durinka; Jeromy Patterson; Farah Karipineni; Sarah Ashburn; Eric Siskind; Jorge Ortiz
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 3.647

7.  Making sense of surgical risk when the data aren't perfect.

Authors:  Meghan B Lane-Fall; Mark D Neuman
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 5.108

8.  Aorto-hepatic bypass in liver transplantation in the MELD-era: outcomes after supraceliac and infrarenal bypasses.

Authors:  Richard Hummel; Sabrina Irmscher; Christina Schleicher; Norbert Senninger; Jens G Brockmann; Heiner H Wolters
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2013-03-05       Impact factor: 2.549

9.  Physician predictions of graft survival following liver transplantation.

Authors:  Nathan R Hoot; Irene D Feurer; Mary T Austin; Michael K Porayko; J Kelly Wright; Nancy M Lorenzi; C Wright Pinson; Dominik Aronsky
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.647

10.  Liver transplantation in adults: Choosing the appropriate timing.

Authors:  Maria Siciliano; Lucia Parlati; Federica Maldarelli; Massimo Rossi; Stefano Ginanni Corradini
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2012-08-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.