Literature DB >> 23459667

Do undergraduate student research participants read psychological research consent forms? Examining memory effects, condition effects, and individual differences.

Eric R Pedersen1, Clayton Neighbors, Judy Tidwell, Ty Lostutter.   

Abstract

While research has examined factors influencing understanding of informed consent in biomedical and forensic research, less is known about participants' attention to details in consent documents in psychological survey research. The present study used a randomized experimental design and found the majority of participants were unable to recall information from the consent form in both in-person and online formats. Participants were also relatively poor at recognizing important aspects of the consent form including risks to participants and confidentiality procedures. Memory effects and individual difference characteristics also appeared to influence recall and recognition of consent form information.

Entities:  

Keywords:  consent form; recall; recognition; research informed consent; self-determination

Year:  2011        PMID: 23459667      PMCID: PMC3583369          DOI: 10.1080/10508422.2011.585601

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ethics Behav        ISSN: 1050-8422


  27 in total

1.  A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation.

Authors:  E L Deci; R Koestner; R M Ryan
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 17.737

2.  Psychological research online: report of Board of Scientific Affairs' Advisory Group on the Conduct of Research on the Internet.

Authors:  Robert Kraut; Judith Olson; Mahzarin Banaji; Amy Bruckman; Jeffrey Cohen; Mick Couper
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  2004 Feb-Mar

Review 3.  Informed consent in clinical trials.

Authors:  F W Verheggen; F C van Wijmen
Journal:  Health Policy       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 2.980

Review 4.  Internet methods for delivering behavioral and health-related interventions (eHealth).

Authors:  Victor Strecher
Journal:  Annu Rev Clin Psychol       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 18.561

5.  Relationship among four Big Five measures of different length.

Authors:  Adrian Furnham
Journal:  Psychol Rep       Date:  2008-02

Review 6.  Decision-making capacity for informed consent in the older population.

Authors:  K Christensen; A Haroun; L J Schneiderman; D V Jeste
Journal:  Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law       Date:  1995

7.  Overview of research addressing ethical dimensions of participation in traumatic stress studies: autonomy and beneficence.

Authors:  Elana Newman; Danny Kaloupek
Journal:  J Trauma Stress       Date:  2009-12

8.  The therapeutic misconception: informed consent in psychiatric research.

Authors:  P S Appelbaum; L H Roth; C Lidz
Journal:  Int J Law Psychiatry       Date:  1982

9.  Competency to consent to research: a psychiatric overview.

Authors:  P S Appelbaum; L H Roth
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  1982-08

10.  Assessing patients' capacities to consent to treatment.

Authors:  P S Appelbaum; T Grisso
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1988-12-22       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  4 in total

1.  Racial/Ethnic Differences in Comprehension of Biospecimen Collection: a Nationwide University of Rochester Cancer Center NCI Community Oncology Research Program Study.

Authors:  Matthew Asare; Charles E Heckler; Eva Culakova; Charles S Kamen; Amber S Kleckner; Lori M Minasian; David S Wendler; Michelle Feige; Carol J Weil; Joan Long; Sharon K Cole; Adedayo A Onitilo; Luke J Peppone; Gary R Morrow; Michelle C Janelsins
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 2.037

2.  Comparing the effects of a patient-designed-and-informed participant information leaflet in comparison with a standard, researcher-designed information leaflet on recruitment, retention and understanding: A study-within-a-trial.

Authors:  Christopher P Dwyer; Robert A Joyce; Fionnuala Rogers; Sinéad M Hynes
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials Commun       Date:  2022-06-02

3.  Assessing Understanding and Obtaining Consent from Adults with Intellectual Disabilities for a Health Promotion Study.

Authors:  Willi Horner-Johnson; Danielle Bailey
Journal:  J Policy Pract Intellect Disabil       Date:  2013-09

4.  Does the management of personal integrity information lead to differing participation rates and response patterns in mental health surveys with young adults? A three-armed methodological experiment.

Authors:  Claes Andersson; Marcus Bendtsen; Petra Lindfors; Olof Molander; Philip Lindner; Naira Topooco; Karin Engström; Anne H Berman
Journal:  Int J Methods Psychiatr Res       Date:  2021-08-21       Impact factor: 4.035

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.