Literature DB >> 30612315

Racial/Ethnic Differences in Comprehension of Biospecimen Collection: a Nationwide University of Rochester Cancer Center NCI Community Oncology Research Program Study.

Matthew Asare1, Charles E Heckler2, Eva Culakova2, Charles S Kamen2, Amber S Kleckner2, Lori M Minasian3, David S Wendler4, Michelle Feige5, Carol J Weil3, Joan Long6, Sharon K Cole7, Adedayo A Onitilo8, Luke J Peppone2, Gary R Morrow2, Michelle C Janelsins2.   

Abstract

To examine whether (a) non-minority participants differed from racial minority participants in the understanding of biospecimens collected for research purposes, (b) patients differed from comparison group in their understanding of the ways their biospecimens could be used by researchers, and (c) participants received adequate information before consenting to donate blood for research studies. We analyzed cross-sectional data from female breast cancer patients scheduled to receive chemotherapy at the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Community Oncology Research Program (NCORP) clinical sites and a healthy comparison group. After reading a consent form related to biospecimens and consenting to participate in a clinical trial, participants' understanding of biospecimen collection was evaluated. Linear models were used to compare scores between non-minority and racial minority participants as well as cancer and non-cancer comparisons adjusting for possible confounding factors. A total of 650 participants provided evaluable data; 592 were non-minority (Caucasian) and 58 participants were a racial minority (71% Black and 29% other). There were 427 cancer patients and 223 comparisons. Non-minority participants scored higher than racial minorities on relevance-to-care items (diff. = 0.48, CI 0.13-0.80, p = 0.001). Comparison group scored higher than cancer patients on relevance-to-care items (diff. = 0.58, CI 0.37-0.78). A moderate number of the participants exhibited a poor understanding of biospecimen collection across all racial/ethnic backgrounds, but racial minority participants' scores remained lower in the relevance-to-care subscale even after adjusting for education and reading level. Differences were also noted among the patients and comparison group. Researchers should facilitate comprehension of biospecimen collection for all study participants, especially racial minority participants.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biospecimens; Consent; Consent form; Disparities; Race

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 30612315      PMCID: PMC6612536          DOI: 10.1007/s13187-018-1464-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cancer Educ        ISSN: 0885-8195            Impact factor:   2.037


  41 in total

1.  The importance of race and ethnic background in biomedical research and clinical practice.

Authors:  Esteban González Burchard; Elad Ziv; Natasha Coyle; Scarlett Lin Gomez; Hua Tang; Andrew J Karter; Joanna L Mountain; Eliseo J Pérez-Stable; Dean Sheppard; Neil Risch
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-03-20       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 2.  Improving the informed consent process for research subjects with low literacy: a systematic review.

Authors:  Leonardo Tamariz; Ana Palacio; Mauricio Robert; Erin N Marcus
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2012-07-11       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 3.  A systematic review of barriers and facilitators to minority research participation among African Americans, Latinos, Asian Americans, and Pacific Islanders.

Authors:  Sheba George; Nelida Duran; Keith Norris
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2013-12-12       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Community Perceptions of Biobanking Participation: A Qualitative Study among Mexican-Americans in Three Texas Cities.

Authors:  Natalia I Heredia; Sarah Krasny; Larkin L Strong; Laura Von Hatten; Lynne Nguyen; Belinda M Reininger; Lorna H McNeill; María E Fernández
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2016-12-08       Impact factor: 2.000

Review 5.  Recruiting vulnerable populations into research: a systematic review of recruitment interventions.

Authors:  Stacy J UyBico; Shani Pavel; Cary P Gross
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2007-03-21       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 6.  The ethical use of mandatory research biopsies.

Authors:  Erin M Olson; Nancy U Lin; Ian E Krop; Eric P Winer
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-08-02       Impact factor: 66.675

7.  Broad Consent for Research on Biospecimens: The Views of Actual Donors at Four U.S. Medical Centers.

Authors:  Teddy D Warner; Carol J Weil; Christopher Andry; Howard B Degenholtz; Lisa Parker; Latarsha J Carithers; Michelle Feige; David Wendler; Rebecca D Pentz
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 1.742

8.  Research on stored biological samples: views of African American and White American cancer patients.

Authors:  Rebecca D Pentz; Laurent Billot; David Wendler
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2006-04-01       Impact factor: 2.802

9.  Barriers and Strategies to Participation in Tissue Research Among African-American Men.

Authors:  Bettina F Drake; Danielle Boyd; Kimberly Carter; Sarah Gehlert; Vetta Sanders Thompson
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 2.037

10.  Engaging diverse populations about biospecimen donation for cancer research.

Authors:  Julie H T Dang; Elisa M Rodriguez; John S Luque; Deborah O Erwin; Cathy D Meade; Moon S Chen
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2014-03-25
View more
  1 in total

1.  ChicagO Multiethnic Prevention and Surveillance Study (COMPASS): Increased Response Rates Among African American Residents in Low Socioeconomic Status Neighborhoods.

Authors:  David J Press; Briseis Aschebrook-Kilfoy; Diane Lauderdale; Elizabeth Stepniak; Scarlett Lin Gomez; Emily Peterson Johnson; Rajan Gopalakrishnan; Fabrice Smieliauskas; Donald Hedeker; Luís Bettencourt; Luc Anselin; Habibul Ahsan
Journal:  J Racial Ethn Health Disparities       Date:  2020-06-15
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.