Literature DB >> 23459110

Sample size requirements to detect an intervention by time interaction in longitudinal cluster randomized clinical trials with random slopes.

Moonseong Heo1, Xiaonan Xue, Mimi Y Kim.   

Abstract

In longitudinal cluster randomized clinical trials (cluster-RCT), subjects are nested within a higher level unit such as clinics and are evaluated for outcome repeatedly over the study period. This study design results in a three level hierarchical data structure. When the primary goal is to test the hypothesis that an intervention has an effect on the rate of change in the outcome over time and the between-subject variation in slopes is substantial, the subject-specific slopes are often modeled as random coefficients in a mixed-effects linear model. In this paper, we propose approaches for determining the samples size for each level of a 3-level hierarchical trial design based on ordinary least squares (OLS) estimates for detecting a difference in mean slopes between two intervention groups when the slopes are modeled as random. Notably, the sample size is not a function of the variances of either the second or the third level random intercepts and depends on the number of second and third level data units only through their product. Simulation results indicate that the OLS-based power and sample sizes are virtually identical to the empirical maximum likelihood based estimates even with varying cluster sizes. Sample sizes for random versus fixed slope models are also compared. The effects of the variance of the random slope on the sample size determinations are shown to be enormous. Therefore, when between-subject variations in outcome trends are anticipated to be significant, sample size determinations based on a fixed slope model can result in a seriously underpowered study.

Entities:  

Keywords:  effect size; longitudinal cluster RCT; power; random slope; sample size; three level data

Year:  2013        PMID: 23459110      PMCID: PMC3580878          DOI: 10.1016/j.csda.2012.11.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Comput Stat Data Anal        ISSN: 0167-9473            Impact factor:   1.681


  16 in total

1.  An integrated population-averaged approach to the design, analysis and sample size determination of cluster-unit trials.

Authors:  John S Preisser; Mary L Young; Daniel J Zaccaro; Mark Wolfson
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2003-04-30       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  When intraclass correlation coefficients go awry: a case study from a school-based smoking prevention study in South Africa.

Authors:  Ken Resnicow; Nanhua Zhang; Roger D Vaughan; Sasiragha Priscilla Reddy; Shamagonam James; David M Murray
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2010-02-18       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Incorporating cost in power analysis for three-level cluster-randomized designs.

Authors:  Spyros Konstantopoulos
Journal:  Eval Rev       Date:  2009-06-09

4.  Cohort versus cross-sectional design in large field trials: precision, sample size, and a unifying model.

Authors:  H A Feldman; S M McKinlay
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1994-01-15       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Sizing a trial to alter the trajectory of health behaviours: methods, parameter estimates, and their application.

Authors:  David M Murray; Jonathan L Blitstein; Peter J Hannan; William L Baker; Leslie A Lytle
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2007-05-20       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  Planning a longitudinal study. II. Frequency of measurement and study duration.

Authors:  J J Schlesselman
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1973-09

7.  Random-effects models for longitudinal data.

Authors:  N M Laird; J H Ware
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Remission in depressed geriatric primary care patients: a report from the PROSPECT study.

Authors:  George S Alexopoulos; Ira R Katz; Martha L Bruce; Moonseong Heo; Thomas Ten Have; Patrick Raue; Hillary R Bogner; Herbert C Schulberg; Benoit H Mulsant; Charles F Reynolds
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 18.112

9.  Re-engineering systems for the treatment of depression in primary care: cluster randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Allen J Dietrich; Thomas E Oxman; John W Williams; Herbert C Schulberg; Martha L Bruce; Pamela W Lee; Sheila Barry; Patrick J Raue; Jean J Lefever; Moonseong Heo; Kathryn Rost; Kurt Kroenke; Martha Gerrity; Paul A Nutting
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-09-02

10.  Sample size requirements to detect an intervention by time interaction in longitudinal cluster randomized clinical trials.

Authors:  Moonseong Heo; Andrew C Leon
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2009-03-15       Impact factor: 2.373

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Review of Recent Methodological Developments in Group-Randomized Trials: Part 1-Design.

Authors:  Elizabeth L Turner; Fan Li; John A Gallis; Melanie Prague; David M Murray
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2017-04-20       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Generalized SAMPLE SIZE Determination Formulas for Investigating Contextual Effects by a Three-Level Random Intercept Model.

Authors:  Satoshi Usami
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2016-11-01       Impact factor: 2.500

Review 3.  Improving the Youth HIV Prevention and Care Cascades: Innovative Designs in the Adolescent Trials Network for HIV/AIDS Interventions.

Authors:  Sylvie Naar; Michael G Hudgens; Ron Brookmeyer; April Idalski Carcone; Jason Chapman; Shrabanti Chowdhury; Andrea Ciaranello; W Scott Comulada; Samiran Ghosh; Keith J Horvath; LaDrea Ingram; Sara LeGrand; Cathy J Reback; Kit Simpson; Bonita Stanton; Tyrel Starks; Dallas Swendeman
Journal:  AIDS Patient Care STDS       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 5.078

4.  Impact of subject attrition on sample size determinations for longitudinal cluster randomized clinical trials.

Authors:  Moonseong Heo
Journal:  J Biopharm Stat       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 1.051

5.  Sample size requirements to detect a two- or three-way interaction in longitudinal cluster randomized clinical trials with second-level randomization.

Authors:  Moonseong Heo; Xiaonan Xue; Mimi Y Kim
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2014-05-16       Impact factor: 2.486

6.  An online-based intervention to promote healthy eating through self-regulation among children: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Paula Magalhães; Cátia Silva; Beatriz Pereira; Gabriela Figueiredo; Ana Guimarães; Armanda Pereira; Pedro Rosário
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2020-09-14       Impact factor: 2.279

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.