Literature DB >> 23458188

Types of pediatric diabetes mellitus defined by anti-islet autoimmunity and random C-peptide at diagnosis.

Maria J Redondo1, Luisa M Rodriguez, Mirna Escalante, E O'Brian Smith, Ashok Balasubramanyam, Morey W Haymond.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that anti-islet autoantibody expression and random serum C-peptide obtained at diagnosis define phenotypes of pediatric diabetes with distinct clinical features.
SUBJECTS: We analyzed 607 children aged <19 yr consecutively diagnosed with diabetes after exclusion of 13% of cases with secondary diabetes (e.g., cystic fibrosis related, steroid induced) and 7.3% of cases lacking measurement of C-peptide and/or autoantibodies.
METHODS: Autoantibody positivity (A+) was defined as ≥ 1 positive out of GAD65, insulin, and ICA512 antibodies. Preserved beta-cell function (β+) was defined as random serum C-peptide at diagnosis ≥ 0.6 ng/mL. Body mass index (BMI) was measured at median 1.2 months after diagnosis. Characteristics at diagnosis and 2 yr (range 18-30 months) after diagnosis were compared among groups.
RESULTS: Autoantibody expression and C-peptide at diagnosis defined the following groups: A+β- (52.1% of the children), A+β+ (32.8%), A-β+ (12.5%), and A-β- (2.6%). These four groups differed in gender, race/ethnicity, and clinical characteristics at diagnosis [i.e., age, pubertal development, obesity/overweight, diabetic ketoacidosis, glycemia, and hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c)] and at 2 yr (i.e., clinical diagnosis, treatment, and HbA1c) (all p < 0.0001). Among all β+ children, C-peptide >2 ng/mL was associated with lower HbA1c at onset (p = 0.0001) and, in the A+β+ subgroup, with higher frequency of achieving HbA1c < 7% at 2 yr (p = 0.03). All three patients (0.7% of total) with monogenic diabetes (maturity onset diabetes of the young, MODY) were A-β+ with C-peptide between 0.6 and 2 ng/mL.
CONCLUSIONS: Anti-islet autoantibodies status and serum random C-peptide at diagnosis define four distinct phenotypes of pediatric diabetes with prognostic value.
© 2013 John Wiley & Sons A/S.

Entities:  

Keywords:  C-peptide; Classification; autoantibodies; children; diabetes

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23458188     DOI: 10.1111/pedi.12022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Diabetes        ISSN: 1399-543X            Impact factor:   4.866


  14 in total

1.  Utility of diabetes-associated autoantibodies for classification of new onset diabetes in children and adolescents.

Authors:  Julia E von Oettingen; Joseph I Wolfsdorf; Henry A Feldman; Erinn T Rhodes
Journal:  Pediatr Diabetes       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 4.866

2.  Reply to Klitz and Niklasson: Can viral infections explain the cross-sectional Austrian diabetes data?

Authors:  Stefan Thurner; Peter Klimek; Michael Szell; Georg Duftschmid; Gottfried Endel; Alexandra Kautzky-Willer; David C Kasper
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-07-23       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Genetic Risk Scores for Type 1 Diabetes Prediction and Diagnosis.

Authors:  Maria J Redondo; Richard A Oram; Andrea K Steck
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2017-10-28       Impact factor: 4.810

Review 4.  Genetics of type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  Maria J Redondo; Andrea K Steck; Alberto Pugliese
Journal:  Pediatr Diabetes       Date:  2017-11-02       Impact factor: 4.866

5.  Can Biomarkers Help Target Maturity-Onset Diabetes of the Young Genetic Testing in Antibody-Negative Diabetes?

Authors:  Shideh Majidi; Alexandra Fouts; Laura Pyle; Christina Chambers; Taylor Armstrong; Zhenyuan Wang; Sat Dev Batish; Georgeanna Klingensmith; Andrea K Steck
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 6.118

Review 6.  Prediction and prevention of type 1 diabetes: update on success of prediction and struggles at prevention.

Authors:  Aaron Michels; Li Zhang; Anmar Khadra; Jake A Kushner; Maria J Redondo; Massimo Pietropaolo
Journal:  Pediatr Diabetes       Date:  2015-07-23       Impact factor: 4.866

7.  DPD epitope-specific glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD)65 autoantibodies in children with Type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  N Bansal; C S Hampe; L Rodriguez; E O'Brian Smith; J Kushner; A Balasubramanyam; M J Redondo
Journal:  Diabet Med       Date:  2016-02-12       Impact factor: 4.359

8.  Systematic Population Screening, Using Biomarkers and Genetic Testing, Identifies 2.5% of the U.K. Pediatric Diabetes Population With Monogenic Diabetes.

Authors:  Maggie Shepherd; Beverley Shields; Suzanne Hammersley; Michelle Hudson; Timothy J McDonald; Kevin Colclough; Richard A Oram; Bridget Knight; Christopher Hyde; Julian Cox; Katherine Mallam; Christopher Moudiotis; Rebecca Smith; Barbara Fraser; Simon Robertson; Stephen Greene; Sian Ellard; Ewan R Pearson; Andrew T Hattersley
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2016-06-06       Impact factor: 19.112

Review 9.  Toward an Improved Classification of Type 2 Diabetes: Lessons From Research into the Heterogeneity of a Complex Disease.

Authors:  Maria J Redondo; Ashok Balasubramanyam
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2021-11-19       Impact factor: 6.134

10.  Demographic and diagnostic markers in new onset pediatric type 1 and type 2 diabetes: differences and overlaps.

Authors:  Teresa Nieto; Beatriz Castillo; Jacobo Nieto; Maria J Redondo
Journal:  Ann Pediatr Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2021-10-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.