Literature DB >> 23457194

MR cholangiopancreatography at 3.0 T in children: diagnostic quality and ability in assessment of common paediatric pancreatobiliary pathology.

A Almehdar1, G B Chavhan.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the diagnostic quality of MR cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) at 3.0 T in children and to assess its diagnostic ability in answering the clinical query. Also, to determine the frequency of artefacts and anatomic variations in ductal anatomy.
METHODS: Consecutive MRCPs performed in children using a 3-T scanner were retrospectively reviewed to note indications, findings, imaging diagnosis, normal variants, quality and artefacts. Analysis was performed based on the final diagnosis assigned by pathology or the combination of clinical, laboratory, imaging features and follow-up to determine whether it was possible to answer the clinical query by MRCP findings.
RESULTS: There were 82 MRCPs performed at 3.0 T on 77 children. 42/82 (51%) MRCPs were of good quality, 35/82 (43%) MRCPs were suboptimal but diagnostic and the remaining 5/82 (6%) MRCPs were non-diagnostic. MRCP answered the clinical query in 61/82 (74%) cases; however, it did not answer the clinical query in 11/82 (14%) cases and was equivocal in 10/82 (12%) cases. There was significant association between the quality of MRCP and the ability of MRCP to answer the clinical query (p<0.0001). 64/82 (78%) MRCP examinations had at least 1 artefact. Variation in the bile duct anatomy was seen in 27/77 (35%) children.
CONCLUSION: MRCP performed at 3.0 T is of diagnostic quality in most cases and is able to provide an answer to the clinical query in the majority of cases. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: 3-T MRCP is feasible and useful in the assessment of pancreatobiliary abnormalities in children.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23457194      PMCID: PMC3635804          DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20130036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  17 in total

1.  High spatial resolution 3D MR cholangiography with high sampling efficiency technique (SPACE): comparison of 3T vs. 1.5T.

Authors:  Shigeki Arizono; Hiroyoshi Isoda; Yoji S Maetani; Yuusuke Hirokawa; Kotaro Shimada; Yuji Nakamoto; Toshiya Shibata; Kaori Togashi
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2008-10-01       Impact factor: 3.528

2.  Usefulness of nonbreath-hold 1-shot magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for the evaluation of choledochal cyst in children.

Authors:  Mitsuyoshi Suzuki; Toshiaki Shimizu; Takahiro Kudo; Ryuyo Suzuki; Yoshikazu Ohtsuka; Yuichiro Yamashiro; Akihiko Shimotakahara; Atsuyuki Yamataka
Journal:  J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 2.839

Review 3.  Multimodality imaging of pancreatic and biliary congenital anomalies.

Authors:  Koenraad J Mortelé; Tatiana C Rocha; Jonathan L Streeter; Andrew J Taylor
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2006 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.333

4.  MR cholangiopancreatography in children: feasibility, safety, and initial experience.

Authors:  Lisa Delaney; Kimberly E Applegate; Boaz Karmazyn; M Fatih Akisik; S Gregory Jennings
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2007-11-13

5.  A retrospective assessment of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in children.

Authors:  Neelesh A Tipnis; Kulwinder S Dua; Steven L Werlin
Journal:  J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 2.839

6.  MR cholangiopancreatography at 3.0 T: intraindividual comparative study with MR cholangiopancreatography at 1.5 T for clinical patients.

Authors:  Hiromitsu Onishi; Tonsok Kim; Masatoshi Hori; Takamichi Murakami; Mitsuaki Tatsumi; Yasuhiro Nakaya; Atsushi Nakamoto; Keigo Osuga; Kaname Tomoda; Hironobu Nakamura
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 6.016

Review 7.  MR imaging at 3.0 T in children: technical differences, safety issues, and initial experience.

Authors:  Govind B Chavhan; Paul S Babyn; Manoj Singh; Logi Vidarsson; Manohar Shroff
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2009 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.333

Review 8.  Pediatric MR cholangiopancreatography: principles, technique, and clinical applications.

Authors:  Govind B Chavhan; Paul S Babyn; David Manson; Logi Vidarsson
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2008 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.333

9.  Imaging findings in 75 pediatric patients with pancreaticobiliary maljunction: a retrospective case study.

Authors:  Wan-liang Guo; Shun-gen Huang; Jian Wang; Mao Sheng; Lin Fang
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2012-08-15       Impact factor: 1.827

Review 10.  The use of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in children.

Authors:  Neelesh A Tipnis; Steven L Werlin
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2007-06
View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Magnetic resonance imaging of pancreaticobiliary diseases in children: from technique to practice.

Authors:  Sudha A Anupindi; Nancy A Chauvin; Asef Khwaja; David M Biko
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2016-05-26

2.  Three-dimensional MR Cholangiopancreatography in a Breath Hold with Sparsity-based Reconstruction of Highly Undersampled Data.

Authors:  Hersh Chandarana; Ankur M Doshi; Alampady Shanbhogue; James S Babb; Mary T Bruno; Tiejun Zhao; Esther Raithel; Michael O Zenge; Guobin Li; Ricardo Otazo
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Reference values of MRI measurements of the common bile duct and pancreatic duct in children.

Authors:  Kriti Gwal; Maria A Bedoya; Neal Patel; Siri J Rambhatla; Kassa Darge; Ram R Sreedharan; Sudha A Anupindi
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2015-02-20
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.