Literature DB >> 19755605

MR imaging at 3.0 T in children: technical differences, safety issues, and initial experience.

Govind B Chavhan1, Paul S Babyn, Manoj Singh, Logi Vidarsson, Manohar Shroff.   

Abstract

The high signal-to-noise ratio and contrast-to-noise ratio of 3.0-T magnetic resonance (MR) imaging can be used to obtain high-resolution thin-section images in a short acquisition time. These advantages are associated with an increased specific absorption rate (SAR) and more artifacts owing to B(1) inhomogeneity and increased susceptibility and chemical shift. Potential advantages of 3-T imaging in children include acquisition of good-quality images even with a small field of view (FOV). The shorter overall acquisition time of 3-T imaging is useful in children, who may not be able to cooperate for long. Shorter acquisition times also improve safety by reducing patient monitoring time within the enclosed bore of an MR imaging unit. SAR-related issues and dielectric artifacts are less problematic with a small FOV. Parallel imaging helps reduce SAR, susceptibility artifacts, and blurring of T2-weighted fast spin-echo (FSE) and single-shot FSE images by reducing the echo train length. (c) RSNA, 2009.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19755605     DOI: 10.1148/rg.295095041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiographics        ISSN: 0271-5333            Impact factor:   5.333


  13 in total

Review 1.  Regional and whole-body imaging in pediatric oncology.

Authors:  Hyun Woo Goo
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2011-04-27

2.  Isotropic 3-D T2-weighted spin-echo for abdominal and pelvic MRI in children.

Authors:  Sílvia Costa Dias; Oystein E Ølsen
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2012-08-28

3.  MR cholangiopancreatography at 3.0 T in children: diagnostic quality and ability in assessment of common paediatric pancreatobiliary pathology.

Authors:  A Almehdar; G B Chavhan
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Clinical safety of 3-T brain magnetic resonance imaging in newborns.

Authors:  Monica Fumagalli; Claudia Maria Cinnante; Sonia Francesca Calloni; Gabriele Sorrentino; Ilaria Gorla; Laura Plevani; Nicola Pesenti; Ida Sirgiovanni; Fabio Mosca; Fabio Triulzi
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2018-03-29

5.  Carotid MRI Detection of Intraplaque Hemorrhage at 3T and 1.5T.

Authors:  J Scott McNally; Hyo-Chun Yoon; Seong-Eun Kim; Krishna K Narra; Michael S McLaughlin; Dennis L Parker; Gerald S Treiman
Journal:  J Neuroimaging       Date:  2014-07-15       Impact factor: 2.486

Review 6.  Current status and future perspectives of magnetic resonance high-field imaging: a summary.

Authors:  Vivek Prabhakaran; Veena A Nair; Benjamin P Austin; Christian La; Thomas A Gallagher; Yijing Wu; Donald G McLaren; Guofan Xu; Patrick Turski; Howard Rowley
Journal:  Neuroimaging Clin N Am       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 2.264

7.  Quantitative T2 and T1ρ mapping are sensitive to ischemic injury to the epiphyseal cartilage in an in vivo piglet model of Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease.

Authors:  A R Armstrong; S Bhave; E O Buko; K L Chase; F Tóth; C S Carlson; J M Ellermann; H K W Kim; C P Johnson
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2022-05-26       Impact factor: 7.507

Review 8.  State-of-the-art magnetic resonance imaging sequences for pediatric body imaging.

Authors:  Mareen Sarah Kraus; Ailish C Coblentz; Vibhas S Deshpande; Johannes M Peeters; Pedro M Itriago-Leon; Govind B Chavhan
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2022-10-18

9.  Motion-insensitive carotid intraplaque hemorrhage imaging using 3D inversion recovery preparation stack of stars (IR-prep SOS) technique.

Authors:  Seong-Eun Kim; John A Roberts; Laura B Eisenmenger; Booth W Aldred; Osama Jamil; Bradley D Bolster; Xiaoming Bi; Dennis L Parker; Gerald S Treiman; J Scott McNally
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2016-07-07       Impact factor: 4.813

10.  Diagnostic abilities of 3T MRI for assessing mandibular invasion of squamous cell carcinoma in the oral cavity: comparison with 64-row multidetector CT.

Authors:  Noriko Suzuki; Ami Kuribayashi; Kei Sakamoto; Junichiro Sakamoto; Shin Nakamura; Hiroshi Watanabe; Hiroyuki Harada; Tohru Kurabayashi
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2019-02-26       Impact factor: 2.419

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.