Literature DB >> 25698367

Reference values of MRI measurements of the common bile duct and pancreatic duct in children.

Kriti Gwal1, Maria A Bedoya, Neal Patel, Siri J Rambhatla, Kassa Darge, Ram R Sreedharan, Sudha A Anupindi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance imaging/cholangiopancreatography (MRI/MRCP) is now an essential imaging modality for the evaluation of biliary and pancreatic pathology in children, but there are no data depicting the normal diameters of the common bile duct (CBD) and pancreatic duct. Recognition of abnormal duct size is important and the increasing use of MRCP necessitates normal MRI measurements.
OBJECTIVE: To present normal MRI measurements for the common bile duct and pancreatic duct in children.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective study we searched all children ages birth to 10 years in our MR urography (MRU) database from 2006 until 2013. We excluded children with a history of hepatobiliary or pancreatic surgery. We stratified 204 children into five age groups and retrospectively measured the CBD and the pancreatic duct on 2-D axial and 3-D coronal T2-weighted sequences. We performed statistical analysis, using logistic and linear regressions to detect the age association of the visibility and size of the duct measurements. We used non-parametric tests to detect gender and imaging plane differences.
RESULTS: Our study included 204 children, 106 (52%) boys and 98 (48%) girls, with a median age of 33 months (range 0-119 months). The children were distributed into five age groups. The common bile duct was visible in all children in all age groups. The pancreatic duct was significantly less visible in the youngest children, group 1 (54/67, 80.5%; P = 0.003) than in the oldest children, group 5 (22/22, 100%). In group 2 the pancreatic duct was seen in 19/21 (90.4%), in group 3 52/55 (94.5%), and in group 4 39/39 (100%). All duct measurements increased with age (P < 0.001; r-value > 0.423), and the incremental differences between ages were significant. The measurement variations between the axial and coronal planes were statistically significant (P < 0.001); however these differences were fractions of millimeters. For example, in group 1 the mean coronal measurement of the CBD was 2.1 mm and the axial measurement was 2.0 mm; the mean coronal measurement of the pancreatic duct was 0.9 mm and the axial measurement was 0.8 mm.
CONCLUSION: Our study provides normative measurements for the common bile duct and pancreatic duct for children up to age 10 years. The upper limits of the CBD and pancreatic duct increase with age, and the values range 1.1-4.0 mm for the CBD and 0.6-1.9 mm for the pancreatic duct.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25698367     DOI: 10.1007/s00247-015-3296-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Radiol        ISSN: 0301-0449


  20 in total

Review 1.  MR imaging of the abdomen and pelvis in infants, children, and adolescents.

Authors:  Kassa Darge; Sudha A Anupindi; Diego Jaramillo
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  MR imaging of the pancreas: 1.5T versus 3T.

Authors:  Robert R Edelman
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 2.266

3.  Reference ranges for sonographic dimensions of the liver and spleen in preterm infants.

Authors:  Zelal Kahramaner; Aydin Erdemir; Ebru Cicek; Hese Cosar; Ebru Turkoglu; Sumer Sutcuoglu; Esra Arun Ozer
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2013-08-17

4.  MRCP in the evaluation of pancreaticobiliary disease in children.

Authors:  C M Arcement; M P Meza; S Arumanla; R B Towbin
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2001-02

5.  Sonographic evaluation of the pancreatic duct in normal children and children with pancreatitis.

Authors:  H C Chao; S J Lin; M S Kong; C C Luo
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 2.153

Review 6.  Multimodality imaging of pancreatic and biliary congenital anomalies.

Authors:  Koenraad J Mortelé; Tatiana C Rocha; Jonathan L Streeter; Andrew J Taylor
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2006 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.333

Review 7.  Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: techniques and applications.

Authors:  Sudha A Anupindi; Teresa Victoria
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 2.266

8.  The utility of secretin-enhanced MRCP in diagnosing congenital anomalies.

Authors:  Kumaresan Sandrasegaran; Gregory A Cote; Bilal Tahir; Iftikhar Ahmad; Mark Tann; Fatih M Akisik; Chandana G Lall; Stuart Sherman
Journal:  Abdom Imaging       Date:  2014-10

Review 9.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the pediatric pancreaticobiliary system.

Authors:  Nathan D Egbert; David A Bloom; Jonathan R Dillman
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am       Date:  2013-08-09       Impact factor: 2.266

Review 10.  Pancreatitis and the role of US, MRCP and ERCP.

Authors:  Kassa Darge; Sudha Anupindi
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2009-04
View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Magnetic resonance imaging of pancreaticobiliary diseases in children: from technique to practice.

Authors:  Sudha A Anupindi; Nancy A Chauvin; Asef Khwaja; David M Biko
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2016-05-26

Review 2.  Acute pancreatitis in children: a review with clinical perspectives to enhance imaging interpretation.

Authors:  Maddy Artunduaga; Amit S Grover; Michael J Callahan
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2021-06-10

3.  Factors Interfering with Delineation on MRCP of Pancreaticobiliary Maljunction in Paediatric Patients.

Authors:  Shun-Gen Huang; Wan-Liang Guo; Jian Wang; Mao Sheng; Xing-Hao Lan; Lin Fang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-22       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.