| Literature DB >> 23456655 |
Satoshi Nakamizo1, Takashi Sasayama, Masakazu Shinohara, Yasuhiro Irino, Shin Nishiumi, Masamitsu Nishihara, Hirotomo Tanaka, Kazuhiro Tanaka, Katsu Mizukawa, Tomoo Itoh, Masaaki Taniguchi, Kohkichi Hosoda, Masaru Yoshida, Eiji Kohmura.
Abstract
Metabolomics has recently undergone rapid development; however, metabolomic analysis in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) is not a common practice. We analyzed the metabolite profiles of preoperative CSF samples from 32 patients with histologically confirmed glioma using gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS). We assessed how alterations in the metabolite levels were related to the World Health Organization (WHO) tumor grades, tumor location, gadolinium enhancement on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and the isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutation status. Sixty-one metabolites were identified in the CSF from glioma patients using targeted, quantitative and non-targeted, semi-quantitative analysis. The citric and isocitric acid levels were significantly higher in the glioblastoma (GBM) samples than in the grades I-II and grade III glioma samples. In addition, the lactic and 2-aminopimelic acid levels were relatively higher in the GBM samples than in the grades I-II glioma samples. The CSF levels of the citric, isocitric, and lactic acids were significantly higher in grade I-III gliomas with mutant IDH than in those with wild-type IDH. The tumor location and enhancement obtained using MRI did not significantly affect the metabolite profiles. Higher CSF levels of lactic acid were statistically associated with a poorer prognosis in grades III-IV malignant gliomas. Our study suggests that the metabolomic analysis of CSF from glioma patients may be useful for predicting the glioma grade, metabolic state, and prognosis of gliomas.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23456655 PMCID: PMC3637650 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-013-1090-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Neurooncol ISSN: 0167-594X Impact factor: 4.130
Patient characteristics
| No | Sex | Age | Pathology | WHO grade | Tumor location | Tumor size (cm3) | Proximal to ventricle | Gd-enhance | IDH1 mutation | IDH2 mutation | Prot (mg/dl) | Glu (mg/dl) | LDH (IU/l) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | F | 37 | PA | Grade I | Cerebellum | 6.0 | + | + | − | − | 27 | 84 | 18 |
| 2 | M | 43 | PA | Grade I | Medulla | 3.0 | − | + | + | − | − | − | − |
| 3 | M | 28 | DA | Grade II | Basal ganglia | 12.8 | − | − | − | − | 37 | 64 | 16 |
| 4 | M | 66 | DA | Grade II | Fronto-temporal | 64.0 | + | − | − | − | 34 | 63 | 34 |
| 5 | F | 75 | DA | Grade II | Temporal | 46.0 | + | − | − | + | − | − | − |
| 6 | M | 35 | OG | Grade II | Frontal | 13.9 | − | + | + | − | 31 | 63 | 16 |
| 7 | F | 60 | OG | Grade II | Frontal | 52.6 | − | − | + | − | 26 | 71 | 25 |
| 8 | M | 64 | OG | Grade II | Frontal | 48.2 | − | − | + | − | 40 | 63 | 26 |
| 9 | F | 16 | EP | Grade II | Third ventricle | 7.0 | + | + | − | − | − | − | − |
| 10 | M | 25 | EP | Grade II | Lateral ventricle | 3.7 | + | + | − | − | 24 | 71 | − |
| 11 | F | 18 | AA | Grade III | Thalamus | 28.6 | + | + | − | − | 29 | 63 | − |
| 12 | F | 31 | AA | Grade III | Temporal | 35.8 | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| 13 | M | 36 | AA | Grade III | Thalamus | 23.9 | − | + | − | − | 6 | 81 | <10 |
| 14 | M | 45 | AA | Grade III | Temporo-parietal | 7.7 | + | + | − | − | 56 | 60 | 29 |
| 15 | F | 66 | AA | Grade III | Frontal | 6.7 | − | − | − | − | 46 | 67 | 29 |
| 16 | M | 35 | AOG | Grade III | Frontal | 104.3 | + | + | + | − | 25 | 55 | 12 |
| 17 | F | 59 | AOG | Grade III | Temporal | 22.0 | − | − | − | − | 48 | 69 | 21 |
| 18 | F | 24 | AEP | Grade III | Parietal | 67.7 | − | + | − | − | 53 | 53 | 11 |
| 19 | F | 39 | GBM | Grade IV | Callosum | 88.8 | + | + | − | − | 56 | 70 | 14 |
| 20 | M | 41 | GBM | Grade IV | Temporal | 61.2 | + | + | − | − | 25 | 64 | 17 |
| 21 | F | 54 | GBM | Grade IV | Callosum | 45.4 | + | + | − | − | 46 | 71 | − |
| 22 | F | 56 | GBM | Grade IV | Temporal | 25.6 | − | + | − | − | 71 | 69 | 18 |
| 23 | F | 57 | GBM | Grade IV | Callosum | 20.8 | + | + | − | − | 186 | 51 | 27 |
| 24 | M | 60 | GBM | Grade IV | Frontal | 15.0 | + | + | − | − | 41 | 116 | − |
| 25 | M | 60 | GBM | Grade IV | Parietal | 74.5 | + | + | − | − | 145 | 75 | 93 |
| 26 | M | 64 | GBM | Grade IV | Frontal | 20.8 | − | + | − | − | 102 | 78 | 15 |
| 27 | F | 65 | GBM | Grade IV | Cerebellum | 19.3 | + | + | − | − | 169 | 49 | 36 |
| 28 | M | 68 | GBM | Grade IV | Optic nerve | 2.1 | − | + | − | − | 76 | 120 | 19 |
| 29 | M | 68 | GBM | Grade IV | Fronto-temporal | 21.9 | − | + | − | − | 87 | 68 | 20 |
| 30 | M | 74 | GBM | Grade IV | Frontal | 26.5 | + | + | − | − | 67 | 67 | 35 |
| 31 | M | 79 | GBM | Grade IV | Temporal | 6.9 | − | + | − | − | 64 | 62 | 46 |
| 32 | F | 79 | GBM | Grade IV | Temporal | 81.4 | + | + | − | − | 125 | 82 | 47 |
PA pilocytic astrocytoma, DA diffuse astrocytoma, OG oligodendroglioma, AA anaplastic astrocytoma, AOG anaplastic oligodendroglioma, AEP anaplastic ependymoma, GBM glioblastoma. Prot protein, Glu glucose, LDH lactate dehydrogenase
Metabolite concentrations in 32 CSF samples as measured by a GCMS-QP2010 Plus
| Compound name | Grade I–II ( | Grade III ( | GBM ( |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean ± SD (μM) | Mean ± SD (μM) | Mean ± SD (μM) | ||
| Succinic acid | 2.26 ± 1.20 | 3.50 ± 3.69 | 1.96 ± 1.03 | |
| Fumaric acid | 1.01 ± 0.859 | 1.67 ± 1.76 | 0.757 ± 0.311 | |
| Malic acid | 2.08 ± 4.14 | 6.12 ± 10.8 | 0.400 ± 0.195 | |
| Aconitic acid | 8.43 ± 3.91 | 7.61 ± 3.84 | 13.8 ± 7.45 | |
| Isocitric acid | 68.8 ± 20.0 | 67.1 ± 24.2 | 121 ± 50.4 |
|
| Citric acid | 70.3 ± 20.8 | 67.8 ± 24.3 | 123 ± 50.1 |
|
| Alanine | 41.5 ± 27.8 | 34.2 ± 5.89 | 43.8 ± 11.0 | |
| Valine | 19.0 ± 10.8 | 14.3 ± 2.97 | 20.2 ± 8.95 | |
| Leucine | 14.2 ± 4.63 | 11.7 ± 3.09 | 15.0 ± 5.28 | |
| Isoleucine | 7.64 ± 2.62 | 5.97 ± 1.80 | 7.56 ± 2.83 | |
| Proline | 7.25 ± 9.45 | 3.78 ± 1.28 | 4.32 ± 1.62 | |
| Serine | 26.4 ± 14.3 | 26.7 ± 9.76 | 22.2 ± 5.71 | |
| Threonine | 27.3 ± 10.0 | 23.6 ± 4.89 | 27.5 ± 6.84 | |
| Methionine | 7.30 ± 1.54 | 6.78 ± 1.29 | 7.64 ± 1.46 | |
| Phenylalanine | 11.1 ± 1.32 | 11.1 ± 1.25 | 13.2 ± 2.69 | |
| Tyrosine | 11.7 ± 2.51 | 11.8 ± 1.72 | 12.3 ± 2.02 |
SD standard deviation
Fig. 1a, b Quantitative level (a) and Semi-quantitative level (b) of metabolites that exhibit significant differences among the grades I–II gliomas, grade III gliomas, and GBMs. The columns are the average of each group; bars, SD. p values were calculated using the Steel–Dwass test (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01). c Quantitative and semi-quantitative metabolite levels that exhibit significant differences between the mutant IDH group versus the wild-type IDH group in grade I–III gliomas except for GBMs. The columns are the average of each group; bars, SD. p values were calculated using the Mann–Whitney nonparametric U test (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01)
A comparison of the metabolite levels involved in the TCA cycle and glycolysis between the glioma with a mutated IDH and the wild-type IDH in all of the gliomas except GBMs
| Compound name | Fold induction: mutated IDH/wild-type IDH |
|
|---|---|---|
| Pyruvate + Oxaloacetic acid |
| 0.049* |
| Citric acid |
| 0.011* |
| Aconitic acid | 1.37 | 0.222 |
| Isocitric acid |
| 0.013* |
| Succinic acid | 0.60 | 1.00 |
| Fumaric acid | 0.40 | 0.190 |
| Malic acid | 0.064 | 0.542 |
| Lactic acid |
| 0.031* |
Pyruvate + oxaloacetic acid and lactic acid were measured by a GCMS-QP2010 Ultra. The other metabolites were measured using a GCMS-QP2010 Plus. The values are the fold induction of the peak intensity value of the group with a mutated IDH and the wild-type IDH. p values were calculated using the Mann–Whitney nonparametric U-test. (* p < 0.05)
Fig. 2a, b In survival analysis using the Kaplan–Meier method for all glioma patients, trends were observed for higher CSF levels of lactic acid or citric acid and having shorter OS (log-rank: lactic acid; p = 0.12, citric acid; p = 0.064). c In malignant gliomas (grade III + IV) alone, higher CSF levels of lactic acid were significantly associated with having a shorter OS (log-rank: p = 0.032)