Literature DB >> 16882557

Reaching patterns across working space: the effects of handedness, task demands, and comfort levels.

Carla M Mamolo1, Eric A Roy, Linda E Rohr, Pamela J Bryden.   

Abstract

Two experiments are reported which examine skill demands, location, and perceived comfort levels for a preferential reaching test with left- and right-handed participants. In Experiment 1, the effect of task demands was examined by having participants perform tasks of varying difficulty with tools (Lift, Pantomime, and Use) that were placed in an array in working space. Preferred hand reaches predominated at the midline and ipsilateral positions, and decreased significantly for contralateral positions, where the frequency of preferred hand reaches increased with task difficulty. In Experiment 2 we developed a new measure (the Comfort Rating Scale) to rate the subjective feeling of comfort for reaching movements. Using the same array of tools and tasks, participants were instructed which hand to use to perform reaching movements, and then rated how the movement felt. The preferred hand was always rated as being comfortable, whereas the non-preferred hand was sensitive to the effects of task demands and tool position. The ratings showed that it was the level of comfort with the non-preferred hand, rather than with the preferred hand, that contributed to the patterns seen on the first study. The Comfort Rating Scale provides new insight into the distribution of reaching movements within working space.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16882557     DOI: 10.1080/13576500600775692

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Laterality        ISSN: 1357-650X


  18 in total

1.  Action properties of object images facilitate visual search.

Authors:  Michael A Gomez; Jacqueline C Snow
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2017-03-06       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Left handedness does not extend to visually guided precision grasping.

Authors:  Claudia L R Gonzalez; R L Whitwell; B Morrissey; T Ganel; M A Goodale
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-08-24       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Effort, success, and nonuse determine arm choice.

Authors:  Nicolas Schweighofer; Yupeng Xiao; Sujin Kim; Toshinori Yoshioka; James Gordon; Rieko Osu
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-05-06       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Decisions in motion: passive body acceleration modulates hand choice.

Authors:  Romy S Bakker; Roel H A Weijer; Robert J van Beers; Luc P J Selen; W Pieter Medendorp
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Hemispheric differences in the control of limb dynamics: a link between arm performance asymmetries and arm selection patterns.

Authors:  Chase J Coelho; Andrzej Przybyla; Vivek Yadav; Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-11-14       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  The probability of choosing both hands depends on an interaction between motor capacity and limb-specific control in chronic stroke.

Authors:  Rini Varghese; Jason J Kutch; Nicolas Schweighofer; Carolee J Winstein
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2020-09-03       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Anisotropy of lateral peripersonal space is linked to handedness.

Authors:  Lise Hobeika; Isabelle Viaud-Delmon; Marine Taffou
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-12-18       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Hand use for grasping in a bimanual task: evidence for different roles?

Authors:  Kayla D Stone; Devon C Bryant; Claudia L R Gonzalez
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-11-18       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Is handedness just response bias?

Authors:  Chase J Coelho; David A Rosenbaum
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-10

10.  Grasping with the eyes of your hands: hapsis and vision modulate hand preference.

Authors:  Kayla D Stone; Claudia L R Gonzalez
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-10-27       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.