Literature DB >> 29349614

Treatment and outcomes of 28 patients with spinal metastasis from gynecological cancer.

Xin Gao1, Chenglong Zhao2, Shaohui He2, Tianqi Fan2, Wei Xu2, Cheng Yang2, Tielong Liu3, Jianru Xiao4.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to provide some useful information concerning clinical characteristics, surgical treatment, potential contributing factor and prognostic factors for patients with gynecological cancer (GC) spinal metastasis. We reviewed 28 patients with GC spinal metastasis in our spine tumor center between July 2008 and July 2015. Surgeries were performed on 22 of them. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to identify potential prognostic factors affecting spinal metastasis-free survival (SMFS) and overall survival. The operative patients responded favorably according to decrease of VAS score and increase of Frankel grade after surgery. The 1- and 2-year survival rates in all patients were 60.7 and 41.0%, respectively. Univariate analysis suggested that age at diagnosis with GC was the potential contributing factor for spinal metastasis, while Frankel grade, ECOG-PS, visceral metastasis and chemotherapy were the potential prognostic factors affecting survival. Multivariate analysis indicated that the independent prognostic factors came from visceral metastasis and chemotherapy. Surgery played an important role in improving patients' quality of life. Patients over 50 years old had a shorter SMFS after diagnosed with GC. Visceral metastasis was an adverse prognostic factor for patients with GC spinal metastasis, while chemotherapy was a favorable one.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gynecological cancer; Overall survival (OS); Prognostic factors; Spinal metastasis; Spinal metastasis-free survival (SMFS); Surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29349614     DOI: 10.1007/s11060-017-2728-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurooncol        ISSN: 0167-594X            Impact factor:   4.130


  34 in total

1.  Effect of timing of surgery on neurological outcome and survival in metastatic spinal cord compression.

Authors:  N A Quraishi; T S Rajagopal; S R Manoharan; S Elsayed; K L Edwards; B M Boszczyk
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-12-30       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Clinical indications for hysteroscopic removal of uterine masses: Time, age at diagnosis, and mass size.

Authors:  Hyun-Woong Cho; Yu-Jin Koo; Jin-Hwa Hong; Jae-Kwan Lee
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Res       Date:  2017-08-17       Impact factor: 1.730

3.  Predictors of survival after surgical treatment of spinal metastasis.

Authors:  Robert T Arrigo; Paul Kalanithi; Ivan Cheng; Todd Alamin; Eugene J Carragee; Stefan A Mindea; Jongsoo Park; Maxwell Boakye
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 4.654

4.  Bone metastasis in cervical cancer patients over a 10-year period.

Authors:  Duangmani Thanapprapasr; Adisak Nartthanarung; Puchong Likittanasombut; Nathpong Israngura Na Ayudhya; Chuenkamon Charakorn; Umaporn Udomsubpayakul; Thanya Subhadarbandhu; Sarikapan Wilailak
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.437

Review 5.  Surgical management of metastatic spinal tumors.

Authors:  I Laufer; D M Sciubba; M Madera; A Bydon; T J Witham; Z L Gokaslan; J-P Wolinsky
Journal:  Cancer Control       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 3.302

6.  Cancer Statistics, 2017.

Authors:  Rebecca L Siegel; Kimberly D Miller; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2017-01-05       Impact factor: 508.702

7.  Radiotherapy is effective for metastatic spinal cord compression in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer.

Authors:  D Rades; S E Schild; J Dunst
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2007 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.437

8.  Surgery and prognostic factors of patients with epidural spinal cord compression caused by hepatocellular carcinoma metastases: retrospective study of 36 patients in a single center.

Authors:  Dan Zhang; Wei Xu; Tielong Liu; Huabin Yin; Xinghai Yang; Zhipeng Wu; Jianru Xiao
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2013-08-01       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Prognostic factor analysis in patients with metastatic spine disease depending on surgery and conservative treatment: review of 577 cases.

Authors:  Byung Ho Lee; Tae-Hwan Kim; Hyun-Soo Chong; Eun-Soo Moon; Jin-Oh Park; Hak-Sun Kim; Seung-Hyun Kim; Hwan-Mo Lee; Yong-jin Cho; Keung Nyun Kim; Seong-Hwan Moon
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2012-09-07       Impact factor: 5.344

10.  Factors associated with improved survival following surgical treatment for metastatic prostate cancer in the spine: retrospective analysis of 29 patients in a single center.

Authors:  Tong Meng; Rui Chen; Nanzhe Zhong; Tianqi Fan; Bo Li; Huabin Yin; Zhenxi Li; Wang Zhou; Dianwen Song; Jianru Xiao
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-07-29       Impact factor: 2.754

View more
  2 in total

1.  A comparison of two different surgical procedures in the treatment of isolated spinal metastasis patients with metastatic spinal cord compression: a case-control study.

Authors:  Shuang Cao; Xin Gao; Yue Zhang; Yifan Wang; Jing Wang; Tao Wang; Ying Liu; Shuming Hou; Jiahao Zhang; Yejin Zhou; Tielong Liu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2021-10-19       Impact factor: 2.721

2.  Clinical Characteristics and Prognostic Analysis of Gynecologic Cancer with Spinal Metastases: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Shuzhong Liu; Xi Zhou; Yong Liu; Ling-Ya Pan; An Song; Zhen Huo; Siyuan Yao; Yipeng Wang
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2020-08-20       Impact factor: 3.989

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.