Literature DB >> 23455580

Nasal douches for diseases of the nose and the paranasal sinuses--a comparative in vitro investigation.

Janna Campos1, Werner Heppt, Rainer Weber.   

Abstract

Nasal douches are applied in great number of diseases of the nose and the paranasal sinuses. For this purpose, many different kinds of nasal douching systems have been introduced into the market. The aim of this study was to examine the irrigation characteristics of the current nasal douching systems. In this context, 26 nasal douching systems were compared regarding irrigation volume, irrigation duration, flow rate and pressure and course of the irrigation stream. The following procedure was applied: First, the spontaneous flow through the nasal douche was measured, then the flow under compression. Finally, these procedures were repeated using a nose model. Furthermore, we asked the manufacturers for information concerning possible cleaning and disinfection techniques. Douching period and flow rate highly depend on physical parameters: distance between liquid column and outlet (hydrostatic pressure) and form and size of the outlet (energy loss because of friction/turbulence). A weak irrigation stream was found in spontaneous release of the douching system when both douching pressure and flow rate offered low values. The douching of the nose model showed that the incompressible nasal douches only reached the lower nasal passage. Only the compressible nasal douching systems led to a diffuse moisturization as well as to a perfusion of the entire nasal cavity. Systematic evaluation of the different recommended cleaning and disinfection methods of the nasal douching systems is still missing. Nasal douches are often recommended in many diseases of the nose and the paranasal sinuses. In this comparative in vitro study, physical parameters and material properties of the nasal douching systems were examined for the first time. For irrigation of the whole nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses, compressible douching systems are recommended which have a minimum output pressure of 120 mbar, a good connection of the outlet to the nostril with a possible insertion into the nasal vestibule and an irrigation stream which is directed upwards (45°). The material should be transparent, easy to clean and disinfect and should not contain harmful elements.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23455580     DOI: 10.1007/s00405-013-2398-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  20 in total

1.  [Nasal irrigation in case of rhinosinusitis].

Authors:  O Michel
Journal:  Laryngorhinootologie       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 1.057

Review 2.  Rhinitis sicca, dry nose and atrophic rhinitis: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Tanja Hildenbrand; Rainer K Weber; Detlef Brehmer
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2010-09-29       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 3.  Local drug delivery.

Authors:  Richard J Harvey; Rodney J Schlosser
Journal:  Otolaryngol Clin North Am       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.346

Review 4.  Canadian clinical practice guidelines for acute and chronic rhinosinusitis.

Authors:  Martin Desrosiers; Gerald A Evans; Paul K Keith; Erin D Wright; Alan Kaplan; Jacques Bouchard; Anthony Ciavarella; Patrick W Doyle; Amin R Javer; Eric S Leith; Atreyi Mukherji; R Robert Schellenberg; Peter Small; Ian J Witterick
Journal:  J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2011-05

Review 5.  Nasal irrigation as an adjunctive treatment in allergic rhinitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kristina E Hermelingmeier; Rainer K Weber; Martin Hellmich; Christine P Heubach; Ralph Mösges
Journal:  Am J Rhinol Allergy       Date:  2012 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.467

6.  Physiologic and hypertonic saline solutions impair ciliary activity in vitro.

Authors:  W M Boek; N Keleş; K Graamans; E H Huizing
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 3.325

7.  Clinical practice guideline: adult sinusitis.

Authors:  Richard M Rosenfeld; David Andes; Neil Bhattacharyya; Dickson Cheung; Steven Eisenberg; Theodore G Ganiats; Andrea Gelzer; Daniel Hamilos; Richard C Haydon; Patricia A Hudgins; Stacie Jones; Helene J Krouse; Lawrence H Lee; Martin C Mahoney; Bradley F Marple; Col John P Mitchell; Robert Nathan; Richard N Shiffman; Timothy L Smith; David L Witsell
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 3.497

8.  Effects of endoscopic sinus surgery and delivery device on cadaver sinus irrigation.

Authors:  Richard J Harvey; John C Goddard; Sarah K Wise; Rodney J Schlosser
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 3.497

9.  Comparison of topical medication delivery systems after sinus surgery.

Authors:  Timothy R Miller; Harlan R Muntz; M Erik Gilbert; Richard R Orlandi
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 3.325

Review 10.  Nasal saline irrigations for the symptoms of chronic rhinosinusitis.

Authors:  R Harvey; S A Hannan; L Badia; G Scadding
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2007-07-18
View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Comprehensive review on endonasal endoscopic sinus surgery.

Authors:  Rainer K Weber; Werner Hosemann
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2015-12-22

2.  Effectiveness of nasal irrigation devices: a Thai multicentre survey.

Authors:  Patorn Piromchai; Charoiboon Puvatanond; Virat Kirtsreesakul; Saisawat Chaiyasate; Sanguansak Thanaviratananich
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2019-05-27       Impact factor: 2.984

Review 3.  [Complications and side effects of conservative treatment of rhinological diseases].

Authors:  I Küster; C Rudack; A Beule
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 4.  Nasal Irrigation: An Imprecisely Defined Medical Procedure.

Authors:  Nicola Principi; Susanna Esposito
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2017-05-11       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Prospective, randomized, controlled, open-label study to compare efficacy of a mineral-rich solution vs normal saline after complete ethmoidectomy.

Authors:  Ludovic de Gabory; Virginie Escabasse; Philippe Boudard; Guillaume de Bonnecaze; Cécile Rumeau; Roger Jankowski; Christian Debry; Sylvain Morinière; Bertrand Merino; Geoffrey Mortuaire; Olivier Malard; Laurence Bordenave
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2018-12-08       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  Nasal lavage containing Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme-2 agonist can prevent and reduce viral load in COVID-19.

Authors:  Gaelle Vofo; Ronit Brodie; Menachem Gross
Journal:  Med Hypotheses       Date:  2020-08-24       Impact factor: 1.538

Review 7.  Current Perspective on Nasal Delivery Systems for Chronic Rhinosinusitis.

Authors:  Junhu Tai; Kijeong Lee; Tae Hoon Kim
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 6.321

8.  A multicenter survey on the effectiveness of nasal irrigation devices in rhinosinusitis patients.

Authors:  Patorn Piromchai; Charoiboon Puvatanond; Virat Kirtsreesakul; Saisawat Chaiyasate; Triphoom Suwanwech
Journal:  Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol       Date:  2020-11-16

9.  A novel irrigation device with superior nasal irrigation efficiency to the classic rinse bottle.

Authors:  Dawei Wu; Feifan Chang; Junsheng Hong; Baihan Su; Yongxiang Wei
Journal:  J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2022-05-03
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.