Literature DB >> 23453871

Long term quality-of-life in patients with bradycardia pacemaker implantation.

Erik O Udo1, Norbert M van Hemel, Nicolaas P A Zuithoff, Heidi Nijboer, William Taks, Pieter A Doevendans, Karel G M Moons.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) values shortly after pacemaker (PM) implantation for bradycardia have been established, however little is known about long-term HRQoL.
METHODS: Using the generic SF-36 and the PM specific Aquarel questionnaire, HRQoL was repeatedly measured during a 7.5 year follow-up period in 881 bradycardia PM recipients included in the large scale nationwide Dutch FOLLOWPACE study. HRQoL over time, corrected for age, gender, diabetes, hypertension, heart failure, cardiovascular disease and AV-synchrony, was assessed with a linear mixed model.
RESULTS: Increased scores both on overall SF-36 and on all SF-36 subscales were observed shortly after implantation. Although scores on SF-36 gradually declined over time, scores remained improved over the measured pre-implantation values. Also, scores for almost all subscales remained increased throughout the 7.5 year observation period, except for physical functioning which showed a gradual decline several years after the initial rise. Additionally, higher scores on all Aquarel scales were observed after implantation. Scores on the arrhythmias and chest discomfort subscales improved and remained stable throughout follow-up (FU), whereas the dyspnea at exertion subscale showed a gradual decline during FU to reach pre-implantation values at 5 years.
CONCLUSIONS: Increased HRQoL is observed not only shortly after PM implantation, but also after long-term FU. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00135174; http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00135174.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Follow-up; GH; Health-related quality of life; MCS; MH; Mental Component Scale; PCS; PF; PM; Pacemaker; Physical Component Scale; RE; RP; SF; VT; general health perceptions; general mental health; pacemaker; physical functioning; role limitations due to emotional problems; role limitations due to physical health problems; social functioning; vitality

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23453871     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2013.01.253

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiol        ISSN: 0167-5273            Impact factor:   4.164


  16 in total

1.  "Why Would I Choose Death?": A Qualitative Study of Patient Understanding of the Role and Limitations of Cardiac Devices.

Authors:  Rachel A Hadler; Nathan E Goldstein; David B Bekelman; Barbara Riegel; Larry A Allen; Robert M Arnold; Matthew E Harinstein; Dio Kavalieratos
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Nurs       Date:  2019 May/Jun       Impact factor: 2.083

Review 2.  New Approaches to Biological Pacemakers: Links to Sinoatrial Node Development.

Authors:  Vasanth Vedantham
Journal:  Trends Mol Med       Date:  2015-11-20       Impact factor: 11.951

3.  Electrophysiology and heart rhythm disorders in older adults.

Authors:  Parag Goyal; Michael W Rich
Journal:  J Geriatr Cardiol       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 3.327

4.  Effects of permanent cardiac pacemaker implantation on vascular endothelial function, blood coagulation and cardiac function in patients with bradycardia.

Authors:  Xinling Zhang; Yan Li; Nan Wang; Chunxiang Zhang; Debing Zhang; Qiang Li
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2018-09-28       Impact factor: 2.447

5.  Assessment of fatigue in patients with a permanent cardiac pacemaker: prevalence and associated factors.

Authors:  Maria Polikandrioti; Konstantinos Tzirogiannis; Sofia Zyga; Georgia Gerogianni; Spyridoula Stefanidou; Athanasia Tsami; Georgios Panoutsopoulos
Journal:  Arch Med Sci Atheroscler Dis       Date:  2018-12-20

6.  Effectiveness and Safety in Remote Monitoring of Patients with Pacemakers Five Years after an Implant: The Poniente Study.

Authors:  Remedios López-Liria; Antonio López-Villegas; César Leal-Costa; Salvador Peiró; Emilio Robles-Musso; Rafael Bautista-Mesa; Patricia Rocamora-Pérez; Knut Tore Lappegård; Daniel Catalán-Matamoros
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-02-23       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  Living with a pacemaker: patient-reported outcome of a pacemaker system.

Authors:  Peter Magnusson; Per Liv
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2018-06-04       Impact factor: 2.298

8.  Pacemaker implantation in patients with major depression, should it be of concern? A case report and literature review.

Authors:  Xiaoru Che; Youssef S Abdelwahed; Xiaoyu Wang; Yuanjian Fang; Lihong Wang
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2020-06-09       Impact factor: 2.298

9.  Long-term cost-utility analysis of remote monitoring of older patients with pacemakers: the PONIENTE study.

Authors:  Rafael Jesus Bautista-Mesa; Antonio Lopez-Villegas; Salvador Peiro; Daniel Catalan-Matamoros; Emilio Robles-Musso; Remedios Lopez-Liria; Cesar Leal-Costa
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2020-11-16       Impact factor: 3.921

10.  Cost-Effectiveness of an Antibacterial Envelope for Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Infection Prevention in the US Healthcare System From the WRAP-IT Trial.

Authors:  Bruce L Wilkoff; Giuseppe Boriani; Suneet Mittal; Jeanne E Poole; Charles Kennergren; G Ralph Corey; Andrew D Krahn; Edward J Schloss; Jose L Gallastegui; Robert A Pickett; Rudolph F Evonich; Steven F Roark; Denise M Sorrentino; Darius P Sholevar; Edmond M Cronin; Brett J Berman; David W Riggio; Hafiza H Khan; Marc T Silver; Jack Collier; Zayd Eldadah; Reece Holbrook; Jeff D Lande; Daniel R Lexcen; Swathi Seshadri; Khaldoun G Tarakji
Journal:  Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol       Date:  2020-09-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.