Literature DB >> 23453659

The impact of hospital volume, residency, and fellowship training on perioperative outcomes after radical prostatectomy.

Quoc-Dien Trinh1, Maxine Sun2, Simon P Kim3, Jesse Sammon4, Keith J Kowalczyk5, Ariella A Friedman4, Shyam Sukumar4, Praful Ravi4, Fred Muhletaler4, Piyush K Agarwal6, Shahrokh F Shariat7, Jim C Hu8, Mani Menon4, Pierre I Karakiewicz2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Although high-volume hospitals have been associated with improved outcomes for radical prostatectomy (RP), the association of residency or fellowship teaching institutions or both and this volume-outcome relationship remains poorly described. We examine the effect of teaching status and hospital volume on perioperative RP outcomes. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Within the Nationwide Inpatient Sample, we focused on RPs performed between 2003 and 2007. We tested the rates of prolonged length of stay beyond the median of 3 days, in-hospital mortality, and intraoperative and postoperative complications, stratified according to teaching status. Multivariable logistic regression analyses further adjusted for confounding factors.
RESULTS: Overall, 47,100 eligible RPs were identified. Of these, 19,193 cases were performed at non-teaching institutions, 24,006 at residency teaching institutions, and 3,901 at fellowship teaching institutions. Relative to patients treated at non-teaching institutions, patients treated at fellowship teaching institutions were healthier and more likely to hold private insurance. In multivariable analyses, patients treated at residency (OR = 0.92, P = 0.015) and fellowship (OR = 0.82, P = 0.011) teaching institutions were less likely to experience a postoperative complication than patients treated at non-teaching institutions. Patients treated at residency (OR = 0.73, P<0.001) and fellowship (OR = 0.91, P = 0.045) teaching institutions were less likely to experience a prolonged length of stay.
CONCLUSIONS: More favorable postoperative complication profile and shorter length of stay should be expected at residency and fellowship teaching institutions following RP. Moreover, postoperative complication rates were lower at fellowship teaching than at residency teaching institutions, despite adjustment for potential confounders.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Complication; Fellowship; Prostatectomy; Prostatic neoplasms; Residency; Teaching

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23453659      PMCID: PMC4201949          DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2012.10.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urol Oncol        ISSN: 1078-1439            Impact factor:   3.498


  24 in total

1.  SAGES guideline for clinical application of laparoscopic bariatric surgery.

Authors: 
Journal:  Surg Obes Relat Dis       Date:  2009-02-23       Impact factor: 4.734

2.  Quality of care for two common illnesses in teaching and nonteaching hospitals.

Authors:  J Z Ayanian; J S Weissman; S Chasan-Taber; A M Epstein
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  1998 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 6.301

3.  The impact of provider volume on outcomes from urological cancer therapy.

Authors:  Fadi N Joudi; Badrinath R Konety
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Volume-based referral for cancer surgery: informing the debate.

Authors:  Brent K Hollenbeck; Rodney L Dunn; David C Miller; Stephanie Daignault; David A Taub; John T Wei
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-01-01       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Analysis of complications following partial and total nephrectomy for renal cancer in a population based sample.

Authors:  Fadi N Joudi; Veerasathpurush Allareddy; Christopher J Kane; Badrinath R Konety
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  High case volumes and surgical fellowships are associated with improved outcomes for bariatric surgery patients: a justification of current credentialing initiatives for practice and training.

Authors:  Geoffrey P Kohn; Joseph A Galanko; D Wayne Overby; Timothy M Farrell
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 6.113

7.  Annual surgical caseload and open radical prostatectomy outcomes: improving temporal trends.

Authors:  Lars Budäus; Firas Abdollah; Maxine Sun; Monica Morgan; Rupinder Johal; Rodolphe Thuret; Kevin C Zorn; Hendrik Isbarn; Shahrokh F Shariat; Francesco Montorsi; Paul Perrotte; Markus Graefen; Pierre I Karakiewicz
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2010-10-16       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Time trends and local variation in primary treatment of localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Matthew R Cooperberg; Jeanette M Broering; Peter R Carroll
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-02-01       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 9.  Impact of surgeon and hospital volume on outcomes of radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Daniel A Barocas; Robert Mitchell; Sam S Chang; Michael S Cookson
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2009-04-22       Impact factor: 3.498

10.  Utilization and outcomes of minimally invasive radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Jim C Hu; Qin Wang; Chris L Pashos; Stuart R Lipsitz; Nancy L Keating
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-05-10       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  8 in total

1.  Robotic-assisted outcomes are not tied to surgeon volume and experience.

Authors:  Maria S Altieri; Jie Yang; Dana A Telem; Hao Chen; Mark Talamini; Aurora Pryor
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Regional differences in total hospital charges between open and robotically assisted radical prostatectomy in the United States.

Authors:  Felix Preisser; Sebastiano Nazzani; Elio Mazzone; Sophie Knipper; Marco Bandini; Zhe Tian; Alexander Haese; Fred Saad; Kevin C Zorn; Francesco Montorsi; Shahrokh F Shariat; Markus Graefen; Derya Tilki; Pierre I Karakiewicz
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-10-12       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Specialization and utilization after hepatectomy in academic medical centers.

Authors:  Joshua J Shaw; Heena P Santry; Shimul A Shah
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2013-05-21       Impact factor: 2.192

4.  The Effect of Body Mass Index on Perioperative Outcomes After Major Surgery: Results from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) 2005-2011.

Authors:  Akshay Sood; Firas Abdollah; Jesse D Sammon; Kaustav Majumder; Marianne Schmid; James O Peabody; Mark A Preston; Adam S Kibel; Mani Menon; Quoc-Dien Trinh
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Risk factors of perioperative complications in patients undergoing radical retropubic prostatectomy: A ten-year experience.

Authors:  Xiao-Jun Liu; Liang Liu; Kun Chang; Ding-Wei Ye; Yong-Fa Zheng; Xu-Dong Yao
Journal:  J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci       Date:  2017-06-06

6.  An evaluation of the timing of surgical complications following nephrectomy: data from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP).

Authors:  Akshay Sood; Firas Abdollah; Jesse D Sammon; Victor Kapoor; Craig G Rogers; Wooju Jeong; Dane E Klett; Julian Hanske; Christian P Meyer; James O Peabody; Mani Menon; Quoc-Dien Trinh
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-04-25       Impact factor: 4.226

7.  Effect of radical prostatectomy surgeon volume on complication rates from a large population-based cohort.

Authors:  Ashraf Almatar; Christopher J D Wallis; Sender Herschorn; Refik Saskin; Girish S Kulkarni; Ronald T Kodama; Robert K Nam
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.862

8.  Perioperative outcomes after radical cystectomy at NCI-designated centres: Are they any better?

Authors:  Florian Roghmann; Praful Ravi; Julian Hanske; Christian P Meyer; Mark A Preston; Joachim Noldus; Quoc-Dien Trinh
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2015 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.862

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.