BACKGROUND: Obesity is associated with poor surgical outcomes and disparity in access-to-care. There is a lack of quality data on the effect of body mass index (BMI) on perioperative outcomes. Accordingly, we sought to determine the procedure specific, independent-effect of BMI on 30-day perioperative outcomes in patients undergoing major surgery. METHODS: Participants included individuals undergoing one of 16 major surgery (cardiovascular, orthopedic, oncologic; n = 141,802) recorded in the ACS-NSQIP (2005-2011). Outcomes evaluated included complications, blood transfusion, length-of-stay (LOS), re-intervention, readmission, and perioperative mortality. Multivariable-regression models assessed the independent-effect of BMI on outcomes. RESULTS: Nearly, 74 % of patients had a BMI disturbance; the majority being overweight (35.3 %) or obese (29.8 %). Morbidly obese patients constituted a small but significant proportion of the patients (5.7 %; n = 8067). In adjusted-analyses, morbidly obese patients had significantly increased odds of wound complications in 15 of the examined procedures, of renal complications after 6-procedures, of thromboembolism after 5-procedures, of pulmonary, septic and UTI complications after 2-procedures, and of cardiovascular complications after CABG. Conversely, obese/overweight patients, except for increased odds of wound complications after select procedures, had significantly decreased odds of perioperative mortality, prolonged-LOS and blood transfusion relative to normal BMI patients after 4, 8, and 9 of the examined procedures. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of BMI derangements in surgical patients is high. The effect of BMI on outcomes is procedure specific. Patients with BMI between 18.5 and 40-kg/m(2) at time of surgery fare equally well with regard to complications and mortality. However, morbidly obese patients are at-risk for postsurgical complications and targeted preoperative-optimization may improve outcomes and attenuate disparity in access-to-care.
BACKGROUND: Obesity is associated with poor surgical outcomes and disparity in access-to-care. There is a lack of quality data on the effect of body mass index (BMI) on perioperative outcomes. Accordingly, we sought to determine the procedure specific, independent-effect of BMI on 30-day perioperative outcomes in patients undergoing major surgery. METHODS:Participants included individuals undergoing one of 16 major surgery (cardiovascular, orthopedic, oncologic; n = 141,802) recorded in the ACS-NSQIP (2005-2011). Outcomes evaluated included complications, blood transfusion, length-of-stay (LOS), re-intervention, readmission, and perioperative mortality. Multivariable-regression models assessed the independent-effect of BMI on outcomes. RESULTS: Nearly, 74 % of patients had a BMI disturbance; the majority being overweight (35.3 %) or obese (29.8 %). Morbidly obesepatients constituted a small but significant proportion of the patients (5.7 %; n = 8067). In adjusted-analyses, morbidly obesepatients had significantly increased odds of wound complications in 15 of the examined procedures, of renal complications after 6-procedures, of thromboembolism after 5-procedures, of pulmonary, septic and UTI complications after 2-procedures, and of cardiovascular complications after CABG. Conversely, obese/overweight patients, except for increased odds of wound complications after select procedures, had significantly decreased odds of perioperative mortality, prolonged-LOS and blood transfusion relative to normal BMI patients after 4, 8, and 9 of the examined procedures. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of BMI derangements in surgical patients is high. The effect of BMI on outcomes is procedure specific. Patients with BMI between 18.5 and 40-kg/m(2) at time of surgery fare equally well with regard to complications and mortality. However, morbidly obesepatients are at-risk for postsurgical complications and targeted preoperative-optimization may improve outcomes and attenuate disparity in access-to-care.
Authors: Quoc-Dien Trinh; Anders Bjartell; Stephen J Freedland; Brent K Hollenbeck; Jim C Hu; Shahrokh F Shariat; Maxine Sun; Andrew J Vickers Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2013-04-19 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Giorgio Gandaglia; Khurshid R Ghani; Akshay Sood; Jessica R Meyers; Jesse D Sammon; Marianne Schmid; Briony Varda; Alberto Briganti; Francesco Montorsi; Maxine Sun; Mani Menon; Adam S Kibel; Quoc-Dien Trinh Journal: JAMA Surg Date: 2014-10 Impact factor: 14.766
Authors: Cynthia L Ogden; Margaret D Carroll; Lester R Curtin; Margaret A McDowell; Carolyn J Tabak; Katherine M Flegal Journal: JAMA Date: 2006-04-05 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Cheryl T Lee; Rodney L Dunn; Bert T Chen; Daya P Joshi; Jaqueline Sheffield; James E Montie Journal: J Urol Date: 2004-10 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Daniel L Davenport; Eleftherios S Xenos; Patrick Hosokawa; Jacob Radford; William G Henderson; Eric D Endean Journal: J Vasc Surg Date: 2008-11-22 Impact factor: 4.268
Authors: Frances Chung; Stavros G Memtsoudis; Satya Krishna Ramachandran; Mahesh Nagappa; Mathias Opperer; Crispiana Cozowicz; Sara Patrawala; David Lam; Anjana Kumar; Girish P Joshi; John Fleetham; Najib Ayas; Nancy Collop; Anthony G Doufas; Matthias Eikermann; Marina Englesakis; Bhargavi Gali; Peter Gay; Adrian V Hernandez; Roop Kaw; Eric J Kezirian; Atul Malhotra; Babak Mokhlesi; Sairam Parthasarathy; Tracey Stierer; Frank Wappler; David R Hillman; Dennis Auckley Journal: Anesth Analg Date: 2016-08 Impact factor: 5.108