OBJECTIVE: Clinical interventions that lengthen life after HIV infection and significantly reduce transmission could have greater impact if more HIV-diagnosed people received HIV care. We tested a surveillance-based approach to investigating reasons for delayed entry to care. METHODS: Health department staff in three states and two cities contacted eligible adults diagnosed with HIV four to 24 months previously who had no reported CD4+ lymphocyte (CD4) or viral load (VL) tests. The staff conducted interviews, performed CD4 and VL testing, and provided referrals to HIV medical care. Reported CD4 and VL tests were prospectively monitored to determine if respondents had entered care after the interview. RESULTS: Surveillance-based follow-up uncovered problems with reporting CD4 and VL tests, resulting in surveillance improvements. However, reporting problems led to misspent effort locating people who were already in care. Follow-up proved difficult because contact information in surveillance case records was often outdated or incorrect. Of those reached, 37% were in care and 29% refused participation. Information from 132 people interviewed generated ideas for service improvements, such as emphasizing the benefits of early initiation of HIV care, providing coverage eligibility information soon after diagnosis, and leveraging other medical appointments to provide assistance with linkage to HIV care. CONCLUSIONS: Surveillance-based follow-up of HIV-diagnosed individuals not linked to care provided information to improve both surveillance and linkage services, but was inefficient because of difficulties identifying, locating, and recruiting eligible people. Inefficiencies attributable to missing, incomplete, or inaccurate surveillance records are likely to diminish as data quality is improved through ongoing use.
OBJECTIVE: Clinical interventions that lengthen life after HIV infection and significantly reduce transmission could have greater impact if more HIV-diagnosed people received HIV care. We tested a surveillance-based approach to investigating reasons for delayed entry to care. METHODS: Health department staff in three states and two cities contacted eligible adults diagnosed with HIV four to 24 months previously who had no reported CD4+ lymphocyte (CD4) or viral load (VL) tests. The staff conducted interviews, performed CD4 and VL testing, and provided referrals to HIV medical care. Reported CD4 and VL tests were prospectively monitored to determine if respondents had entered care after the interview. RESULTS: Surveillance-based follow-up uncovered problems with reporting CD4 and VL tests, resulting in surveillance improvements. However, reporting problems led to misspent effort locating people who were already in care. Follow-up proved difficult because contact information in surveillance case records was often outdated or incorrect. Of those reached, 37% were in care and 29% refused participation. Information from 132 people interviewed generated ideas for service improvements, such as emphasizing the benefits of early initiation of HIV care, providing coverage eligibility information soon after diagnosis, and leveraging other medical appointments to provide assistance with linkage to HIV care. CONCLUSIONS: Surveillance-based follow-up of HIV-diagnosed individuals not linked to care provided information to improve both surveillance and linkage services, but was inefficient because of difficulties identifying, locating, and recruiting eligible people. Inefficiencies attributable to missing, incomplete, or inaccurate surveillance records are likely to diminish as data quality is improved through ongoing use.
Authors: P L Vernazza; L Troiani; M J Flepp; R W Cone; J Schock; F Roth; K Boggian; M S Cohen; S A Fiscus; J J Eron Journal: AIDS Date: 2000-01-28 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: L M Mofenson; J S Lambert; E R Stiehm; J Bethel; W A Meyer; J Whitehouse; J Moye; P Reichelderfer; D R Harris; M G Fowler; B J Mathieson; G J Nemo Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1999-08-05 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: P M Garcia; L A Kalish; J Pitt; H Minkoff; T C Quinn; S K Burchett; J Kornegay; B Jackson; J Moye; C Hanson; C Zorrilla; J F Lew Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1999-08-05 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Nicola M Zetola; Kyle Bernstein; Katherine Ahrens; Julia L Marcus; Susan Philip; Giuliano Nieri; Diane Jones; C Bradley Hare; Ling Hsu; Susan Scheer; Jeffrey D Klausner Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2009-01-14 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Jeanne Bertolli; R Luke Shouse; Linda Beer; Eduardo Valverde; Jennifer Fagan; Samuel M Jenness; Afework Wogayehu; Christopher Johnson; Alan Neaigus; Daniel Hillman; Maria Courogen; Kathleen A Brady; Barbara Bolden Journal: Open AIDS J Date: 2012-09-07
Authors: Patricia Sweeney; Lytt I Gardner; Kate Buchacz; Pamela Morse Garland; Michael J Mugavero; Jeffrey T Bosshart; R Luke Shouse; Jeanne Bertolli Journal: Milbank Q Date: 2013-07-08 Impact factor: 4.911
Authors: Chinazo O Cunningham; Johanna Buck; Fiona M Shaw; Laurence S Spiegel; Moonseong Heo; Bruce D Agins Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2014-08-01 Impact factor: 3.731
Authors: Mary Jo Trepka; Diana M Sheehan; Kristopher P Fennie; Daniel E Mauck; Spencer Lieb; Lorene M Maddox; Theophile Niyonsenga Journal: J Health Care Poor Underserved Date: 2018
Authors: Mabel Padilla; Christine L Mattson; Susan Scheer; Chi-Chi N Udeagu; Susan E Buskin; Alison J Hughes; Thomas Jaenicke; Amy Rock Wohl; Joseph Prejean; Stanley C Wei Journal: Public Health Rep Date: 2018-02-27 Impact factor: 2.792
Authors: James M Tesoriero; Britney L Johnson; Rachel Hart-Malloy; Jennifer L Cukrovany; Brenda L Moncur; Kathleen M Bogucki; Bridget J Anderson; Megan C Johnson Journal: J Public Health Manag Pract Date: 2017 May/Jun