BACKGROUND: Indicators for determining one's status on the HIV care continuum are often measured using clinical and surveillance data but do not typically assess patient perspectives. We assessed patient-reported care status along the care continuum and whether it differed from medical records and surveillance data. METHODS: Between June 2013 and October 2014, a convenience sample of clinic-attending HIV-infected persons was surveyed regarding care-seeking behaviors and self-perceived status along the care continuum. Participant responses were matched to DC Department of Health surveillance data and clinic records. Participants' care patterns were classified using Health Resources Services Administration-defined care status: in care (IC), sporadic care (SC), or out of care (OOC). Semistructured qualitative interviews were analyzed using an open coding process to elucidate relevant themes regarding participants' perceptions of engagement in care. RESULTS: Of 169 participants, most were male participants (64%) and black (72%), with a mean age of 50.7 years. Using self-reported visit patterns, 115 participants (68%) were consistent with being IC, 33 (20%) SC, and 21 (12%) OOC. Among OOC participants, 52% perceived themselves to be fully engaged in HIV care. In the previous year, among OOC participants, 71% reported having a non-HIV-related medical visit and 90% reported current antiretroviral use. Qualitatively, most SC and OOC persons did not see their HIV providers regularly because they felt healthy. CONCLUSIONS: Participants' perceptions of HIV care engagement differed from actual care receipt as measured by surveillance and clinical records. Measures of care engagement may need to be reconsidered as persons not receiving regular HIV care maybe accessing other health care and HIV medications elsewhere.
BACKGROUND: Indicators for determining one's status on the HIV care continuum are often measured using clinical and surveillance data but do not typically assess patient perspectives. We assessed patient-reported care status along the care continuum and whether it differed from medical records and surveillance data. METHODS: Between June 2013 and October 2014, a convenience sample of clinic-attending HIV-infectedpersons was surveyed regarding care-seeking behaviors and self-perceived status along the care continuum. Participant responses were matched to DC Department of Health surveillance data and clinic records. Participants' care patterns were classified using Health Resources Services Administration-defined care status: in care (IC), sporadic care (SC), or out of care (OOC). Semistructured qualitative interviews were analyzed using an open coding process to elucidate relevant themes regarding participants' perceptions of engagement in care. RESULTS: Of 169 participants, most were male participants (64%) and black (72%), with a mean age of 50.7 years. Using self-reported visit patterns, 115 participants (68%) were consistent with being IC, 33 (20%) SC, and 21 (12%) OOC. Among OOC participants, 52% perceived themselves to be fully engaged in HIV care. In the previous year, among OOC participants, 71% reported having a non-HIV-related medical visit and 90% reported current antiretroviral use. Qualitatively, most SC and OOC persons did not see their HIV providers regularly because they felt healthy. CONCLUSIONS:Participants' perceptions of HIV care engagement differed from actual care receipt as measured by surveillance and clinical records. Measures of care engagement may need to be reconsidered as persons not receiving regular HIV care maybe accessing other health care and HIV medications elsewhere.
Authors: Kathryn Whetten; Jane Leserman; Rachel Whetten; Jan Ostermann; Nathan Thielman; Marvin Swartz; Dalene Stangl Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2006-02-28 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Thomas P Giordano; Fehmida Visnegarwala; A Clinton White; Catherine L Troisi; Ralph F Frankowski; Christine M Hartman; Richard M Grimes Journal: AIDS Care Date: 2005-08
Authors: Thomas P Giordano; Allen L Gifford; A Clinton White; Maria E Suarez-Almazor; Linda Rabeneck; Christine Hartman; Lisa I Backus; Larry A Mole; Robert O Morgan Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2007-04-23 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Serena Rajabiun; R Kevin Mallinson; Kate McCoy; Sharon Coleman; Mari-Lynn Drainoni; Casey Rebholz; Tim Holbert Journal: AIDS Patient Care STDS Date: 2007 Impact factor: 5.078
Authors: Alan E Greenberg; David W Purcell; Christopher M Gordon; Rebecca J Barasky; Carlos del Rio Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2015-05-01 Impact factor: 3.731
Authors: Robert M Bossarte; Ronald C Kessler; Andrew A Nierenberg; Ambarish Chattopadhyay; Pim Cuijpers; Angel Enrique; Phyllis M Foxworth; Sarah M Gildea; Bea Herbeck Belnap; Marc W Haut; Kari B Law; William D Lewis; Howard Liu; Alexander R Luedtke; Wilfred R Pigeon; Larry A Rhodes; Derek Richards; Bruce L Rollman; Nancy A Sampson; Cara M Stokes; John Torous; Tyler D Webb; Jose R Zubizarreta Journal: Trials Date: 2022-06-20 Impact factor: 2.728
Authors: Irene Kuo; Tao Liu; Rudy Patrick; Claudia Trezza; Lauri Bazerman; Breana J Uhrig Castonguay; James Peterson; Ann Kurth; Curt G Beckwith Journal: AIDS Behav Date: 2019-04
Authors: Katerina A Christopoulos; Torsten B Neilands; Kimberly A Koester; John A Sauceda; Samantha E Dilworth; Michael J Mugavero; Heidi M Crane; Rob J Fredericksen; Edward R Cachay; Kenneth H Mayer; Richard D Moore; Sonia Napravnik; Mallory O Johnson Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2021-10-05 Impact factor: 20.999
Authors: Martin Hoenigl; Antoine Chaillon; David J Moore; Sheldon R Morris; Sanjay R Mehta; Sara Gianella; K Rivet Amico; Susan J Little Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2016-09-06 Impact factor: 4.379