Literature DB >> 23449946

Comparative evaluation of dimension and surface detail accuracy of models produced by three different rapid prototype techniques.

K Murugesan1, Ponsekar Abraham Anandapandian, Sumeet Kumar Sharma, M Vasantha Kumar.   

Abstract

Rapid prototyping (RP) is a technology that produces physical models by selectively solidifying ultra violet (UV) sensitive liquid resin using a laser beam. These models can be formed using various techniques. A study was undertaken to compare the dimensional accuracy and surface details of three prototype models with a 3D STL (standard template library) image. In this study the STL file was used to produce three different rapid prototype models namely; model 1-fused deposition model (FDM) using ABS (acrylonitrile butadiene styrene), model 2-Polyjet using a clear resin and model 3-a 3 dimensional printing using a composite material. Measurements were made at various anatomical points. For surface detail reproductions the models were subjected to scanning electron microscopy analysis. The dimensions of the model created by Polyjet were closest to the 3D STL virtual image followed by the 3DP model and FDM. SEM analysis showed uniform smooth surface on Polyjet model with adequate surface details.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fused deposition modeling; Polyjet resin; Rapid prototyping; Standard template library; Three dimensional printing

Year:  2011        PMID: 23449946      PMCID: PMC3332309          DOI: 10.1007/s13191-011-0103-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc        ISSN: 0972-4052


  3 in total

1.  Analysis of errors in medical rapid prototyping models.

Authors:  J Y Choi; J H Choi; N K Kim; Y Kim; J K Lee; M K Kim; J H Lee; M J Kim
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 2.789

2.  Rapid prototyping as a tool for diagnosis and treatment planning for maxillary canine impaction.

Authors:  Jorge Faber; Patrícia Medeiros Berto; Marcelo Quaresma
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.650

3.  Dimensional error in selective laser sintering and 3D-printing of models for craniomaxillary anatomy reconstruction.

Authors:  Daniela Nascimento Silva; Marília Gerhardt de Oliveira; Eduardo Meurer; Maria Inês Meurer; Jorge Vicente Lopes da Silva; Ailton Santa-Bárbara
Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg       Date:  2008-06-25       Impact factor: 2.078

  3 in total
  14 in total

Review 1.  Revolutionizing restorative dentistry: an overview.

Authors:  D R Prithviraj; Harleen Kaur Bhalla; Richa Vashisht; K Sounderraj; Shruthi Prithvi
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2014-02-05

2.  3D Printing of CT Dataset: Validation of an Open Source and Consumer-Available Workflow.

Authors:  Chandra Bortolotto; Esmeralda Eshja; Caterina Peroni; Matteo A Orlandi; Nicola Bizzotto; Paolo Poggi
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  Influence of the three-dimensional printing technique and printing layer thickness on model accuracy.

Authors:  Zhe-Chen Zhang; Pei-Lun Li; Feng-Ting Chu; Gang Shen
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2019-06-06       Impact factor: 1.938

4.  [A method to evaluate the trueness of reconstructed dental models made with photo-curing 3D printing technologies].

Authors:  N Xiao; Y C Sun; Y J Zhao; Y Wang
Journal:  Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban       Date:  2019-02-18

5.  Accuracy of stereolithographically printed digital models compared to plaster models.

Authors:  Leonardo Tavares Camardella; Oswaldo V Vilella; Marleen M van Hezel; Karel H Breuning
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2017-03-30       Impact factor: 1.938

6.  A synergistic approach to the design, fabrication and evaluation of 3D printed micro and nano featured scaffolds for vascularized bone tissue repair.

Authors:  Benjamin Holmes; Kartik Bulusu; Michael Plesniak; Lijie Grace Zhang
Journal:  Nanotechnology       Date:  2016-01-13       Impact factor: 3.874

7.  Assessment of different types of intra oral scanners and 3D printers on the accuracy of printed models: An in vitro study.

Authors:  Fernando Igai; Washington-Steagall Junior; Carolina-Mayumi Iegami; Pedro-Tortamano Neto
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2021-12-01

8.  Accuracy of Three-Dimensional (3D) Printed Dental Digital Models Generated with Three Types of Resin Polymers by Extra-Oral Optical Scanning.

Authors:  Eugen S Bud; Vlad I Bocanet; Mircea H Muntean; Alexandru Vlasa; Sorana M Bucur; Mariana Păcurar; Bogdan R Dragomir; Cristian D Olteanu; Anamaria Bud
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-04-28       Impact factor: 4.241

9.  Comparison of Adaptation between the Major Connectors Fabricated from Intraoral Digital Impressions and Extraoral Digital Impressions.

Authors:  Ning Gan; Yaye Ruan; Jian Sun; Yaoyang Xiong; Ting Jiao
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-01-11       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Accuracy of three-dimensional printing for manufacturing replica teeth.

Authors:  Keun-Young Lee; Jin-Woo Cho; Na-Young Chang; Jong-Moon Chae; Kyung-Hwa Kang; Sang-Cheol Kim; Jin-Hyoung Cho
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2015-09-23       Impact factor: 1.372

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.