Literature DB >> 33924968

Accuracy of Three-Dimensional (3D) Printed Dental Digital Models Generated with Three Types of Resin Polymers by Extra-Oral Optical Scanning.

Eugen S Bud1, Vlad I Bocanet2, Mircea H Muntean2, Alexandru Vlasa1, Sorana M Bucur3, Mariana Păcurar1, Bogdan R Dragomir4, Cristian D Olteanu5, Anamaria Bud1.   

Abstract

Digital impression devices are used alternatively to conventional impression techniques and materials. The aim of this study was to evaluate the precision of extraoral digitalization of three types of photosensitive resin polymers used for 3D printing with the aid of a digital extraoral optical scanner. The alignment of the scans was performed by a standard best-fit alignment. Trueness and precision were used to evaluate the models. The trueness was evaluated by using bias as a measure and the standard deviation was used to evaluate the precision. After assessing the normality of the distributions, an independent Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare the trueness and precision across the material groups. The Mann-Whitney test was used as a post-hoc test for significant differences. The result of the analysis showed significant differences (U = 66, z = -2.337, p = 0.019) in trueness of mesiodistal distances. Upon visual inspection of the models, defects were noticed on two out of nine of the models printed with a photosensitive polymer. The defects were presented as cavities caused by air bubbles and were also reflected in the scans. Mean precision did not vary too much between these three photosensitive polymer resins, therefore, the selection of 3D printing materials should be based on the trueness and the required precision of the clinical purpose of the model.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D printed dental models; extra-oral scanning; polymer resin

Year:  2021        PMID: 33924968     DOI: 10.3390/jcm10091908

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Med        ISSN: 2077-0383            Impact factor:   4.241


  17 in total

1.  Complete 3-D reconstruction of dental cast shape using perceptual grouping.

Authors:  Y Hirogaki; T Sohmura; H Satoh; J Takahashi; K Takada
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 10.048

2.  Analysis of errors in medical rapid prototyping models.

Authors:  J Y Choi; J H Choi; N K Kim; Y Kim; J K Lee; M K Kim; J H Lee; M J Kim
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 2.789

3.  Accuracy and reproducibility of linear measurements of resin, plaster, digital and printed study-models.

Authors:  Waleed K Saleh; Emy Ariffin; Martyn Sherriff; Dirk Bister
Journal:  J Orthod       Date:  2015-07-28

4.  Optical 3D scans for orthodontic diagnostics performed on full-arch impressions. Completeness of surface structure representation.

Authors:  Annike B Vogel; Fatih Kilic; Falko Schmidt; Sebastian Rübel; Bernd G Lapatki
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 1.938

5.  Maxillary incisor palatal erosion: no correlation with dietary variables?

Authors:  R G Chadwick; H L Mitchell; S L Manton; S Ward; S Ogston; R Brown
Journal:  J Clin Pediatr Dent       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 1.065

6.  Quantitative analysis of tooth surface loss associated with gastroesophageal reflux disease: a longitudinal clinical study.

Authors:  Daranee Tantbirojn; Maria R Pintado; Antheunis Versluis; Carol Dunn; Ralph Delong
Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 3.634

7.  Assessing the feasibility and accuracy of digitizing edentulous jaws.

Authors:  Sebastian B M Patzelt; Sebastian Vonau; Susanne Stampf; Wael Att
Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 3.634

8.  Dimensional accuracy of jaw scans performed on alginate impressions or stone models: A practice-oriented study.

Authors:  Annike B Vogel; Fatih Kilic; Falko Schmidt; Sebastian Rübel; Bernd G Lapatki
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.938

9.  Possibility of reconstruction of dental plaster cast from 3D digital study models.

Authors:  Magdalena Kasparova; Lucie Grafova; Petr Dvorak; Tatjana Dostalova; Ales Prochazka; Hana Eliasova; Josef Prusa; Soroush Kakawand
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2013-05-31       Impact factor: 2.819

10.  A comparative evaluation of intraoral and extraoral digital impressions: An in vivo study.

Authors:  Gursharan Kaur Sason; Gaurang Mistry; Rubina Tabassum; Omkar Shetty
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2018 Apr-Jun
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.